Department of Clinical Research, National Cen, ter for Global Health and Medicine, 1-21-1 Toyama, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 162-8655, Japan.
Department of Nutritional and Health Sciences, Faculty of Food and Nutritional Sciences, Toyo University, 1-1-1 Izumino, Itakura-machi, Ora-gun, Gunma, 374-0193, Japan.
Nutr J. 2021 Jul 15;20(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12937-021-00724-2.
The collection of weighed food records (WFR) is a gold standard for dietary assessment. We propose using the 24-h recall method combined with a portable camera and a food atlas (24hR-camera). This combination overcomes the disadvantages of the 24-h dietary recall method. Our study examined the validity of the 24hR-camera method against WFR by comparing the results.
Study subjects were 30 Japanese males, aged 31-58 years, who rarely cook and reside in the Tokyo metropolitan area. For validation, we compared the estimated food intake (24hR-camera method) and weighed food intake (WFR method). The 24hR-camera method uses digital photographs of all food consumed during a day, taken by the subjects, and a 24-h recall questionnaire conducted by a registered dietitian, who estimates food intake by comparing the participant's photographs with food atlas photographs. The WFR method involves a registered dietitian weighing each food item prepared for the subject to consume and any leftovers. Food intake was calculated for each food group and nutrient using the 24hR-camera vs. weighed methods.
Correlation coefficients between the estimated vs. weighed food intake were 0.7 or higher in most food groups but were low in food groups, such as oils, fats, condiments, and spices. The estimated intake of vegetables was significantly lower for the 24hR-camera method compared to the WFR method. For other food groups, the percentages of the mean difference between estimated vs. weighed food intake were -22.1% to 5.5%, with no significant differences between the methods (except for algae, which had a very low estimated intake). The correlation coefficients between the two methods were 0.774 for energy, and 0.855, 0.769, and 0.763 for the macronutrients, proteins, lipids, and carbohydrates, respectively, demonstrating high correlation coefficients: greater than 0.75. The correlation coefficients between the estimated vs. weighed for salt equivalents and potassium intake were 0.583 and 0.560, respectively, but no significant differences in intake were observed.
The 24hR-camera method satisfactorily estimated the intake of energy and macronutrients (except salt equivalents and potassium) in Japanese males and was confirmed as a useful method for dietary assessment.
称重食物记录(WFR)的收集是饮食评估的金标准。我们建议使用 24 小时回忆法结合便携式相机和食物图谱(24hR-camera)。这种组合克服了 24 小时膳食回忆法的缺点。我们的研究通过比较结果来检验 24hR-camera 法与 WFR 的有效性。
研究对象为 30 名年龄在 31-58 岁之间的日本男性,他们很少做饭,居住在东京大都市区。为了验证,我们比较了估计的食物摄入量(24hR-camera 法)和称重食物摄入量(WFR 法)。24hR-camera 法使用参与者拍摄的当天所有食用食物的数字照片和由注册营养师进行的 24 小时回忆问卷,注册营养师通过将参与者的照片与食物图谱照片进行比较来估计食物摄入量。WFR 方法涉及由注册营养师称重为参与者准备的每种食物和任何剩余食物。使用 24hR-camera 与称重方法计算每个食物组和营养素的食物摄入量。
在大多数食物组中,估计与称重食物摄入量之间的相关系数为 0.7 或更高,但在油、脂肪、调味料和香料等食物组中较低。与 WFR 方法相比,24hR-camera 法估计的蔬菜摄入量明显较低。对于其他食物组,估计与称重食物摄入量之间的平均差异百分比为-22.1%至 5.5%,两种方法之间没有显著差异(藻类除外,其估计摄入量非常低)。两种方法之间的相关系数分别为能量的 0.774,以及蛋白质、脂质和碳水化合物的 0.855、0.769 和 0.763,表明相关性很高:大于 0.75。盐当量和钾摄入量的估计与称重摄入量之间的相关系数分别为 0.583 和 0.560,但摄入量没有显著差异。
24hR-camera 法满意地估计了日本男性的能量和宏量营养素(盐当量和钾除外)的摄入量,并被证实是一种有用的膳食评估方法。