Scheelbeek Pauline F D, Dangour Alan D, Jarmul Stephanie, Turner Grace, Sietsma Anne J, Minx Jan C, Callaghan Max, Ajibade Idowu, Austin Stephanie E, Biesbroek Robbert, Bowen Kathryn J, Chen Tara, Davis Katy, Ensor Tim, Ford James D, Galappaththi Eranga K, Joe Elphin T, Musah-Surugu Issah J, Alverio Gabriela Nagle, Schwerdtle Patricia Nayna, Pokharel Pratik, Salubi Eunice A, Scarpa Giulia, Segnon Alcade C, Siña Mariella, Templeman Sienna, Xu Jiren, Zavaleta-Cortijo Carol, Berrang-Ford Lea
Centre on Climate Change and Planetary Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Department of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Environ Res Lett. 2021 Jul;16(7):073001. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/ac092c. Epub 2021 Jul 13.
Climate change adaptation responses are being developed and delivered in many parts of the world in the absence of detailed knowledge of their effects on public health. Here we present the results of a systematic review of peer-reviewed literature reporting the effects on health of climate change adaptation responses in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The review used the 'Global Adaptation Mapping Initiative' database (comprising 1682 publications related to climate change adaptation responses) that was constructed through systematic literature searches in Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar (2013-2020). For this study, further screening was performed to identify studies from LMICs reporting the effects on human health of climate change adaptation responses. Studies were categorised by study design and data were extracted on geographic region, population under investigation, type of adaptation response and reported health effects. The review identified 99 studies (1117 reported outcomes), reporting evidence from 66 LMICs. Only two studies were formal evaluations of climate change adaptation responses. Papers reported adaptation responses related to flooding, rainfall, drought and extreme heat, predominantly through behaviour change, and infrastructural and technological improvements. Reported (direct and intermediate) health outcomes included reduction in infectious disease incidence, improved access to water/sanitation and improved food security. All-cause mortality was rarely reported, and no papers were identified reporting on maternal and child health. Reported maladaptations were predominantly related to widening of inequalities and unforeseen co-harms. Reporting and publication-bias seems likely with only 3.5% of all 1117 health outcomes reported to be negative. Our review identified some evidence that climate change adaptation responses may have benefits for human health but the overall paucity of evidence is concerning and represents a major missed opportunity for learning. There is an urgent need for greater focus on the funding, design, evaluation and standardised reporting of the effects on health of climate change adaptation responses to enable evidence-based policy action.
在对气候变化适应措施对公众健康的影响缺乏详细了解的情况下,世界许多地区正在制定并实施气候变化适应措施。在此,我们展示了一项对同行评议文献的系统综述结果,这些文献报告了低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)中气候变化适应措施对健康的影响。该综述使用了“全球适应映射倡议”数据库(包含1682篇与气候变化适应措施相关的出版物),该数据库是通过在Scopus、科学网和谷歌学术上进行系统的文献检索(2013 - 2020年)构建而成。对于本研究,我们进行了进一步筛选,以确定来自低收入和中等收入国家的、报告气候变化适应措施对人类健康影响的研究。研究根据研究设计进行分类,并提取了有关地理区域、受调查人群、适应措施类型以及报告的健康影响的数据。该综述确定了99项研究(1117个报告结果),报告了来自66个低收入和中等收入国家的证据。只有两项研究是对气候变化适应措施的正式评估。论文报告的适应措施主要与洪水、降雨、干旱和极端高温有关,主要通过行为改变以及基础设施和技术改进来实现。报告的(直接和中间)健康结果包括传染病发病率降低、获得水/卫生设施的机会改善以及粮食安全改善。全因死亡率很少被报告,未发现有论文报告母婴健康情况。报告的适应不良主要与不平等加剧和意外的共同危害有关。报告和发表偏倚似乎很可能存在,因为在所有1117个健康结果中,只有3.5%被报告为负面。我们的综述发现了一些证据,表明气候变化适应措施可能对人类健康有益,但总体证据匮乏令人担忧,这是一个重大的学习机会错失。迫切需要更加关注气候变化适应措施对健康影响的资金投入、设计评估和标准化报告,以便采取基于证据的政策行动。