Fusco Gerardo, Gambaro Francesco M, Di Matteo Berardo, Kon Elizaveta
Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Milan, Italy.
IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy.
EFORT Open Rev. 2021 Jun 28;6(6):501-509. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210026. eCollection 2021 Jun.
Knee osteoarthritis is a degenerative condition characterized by progressive cartilage degradation, subchondral damage, and bone remodelling. Among the approaches implemented to achieve symptomatic and functional improvements, injection treatments have gained increasing attention due to the possibility of intra-articular delivery with reduced side effects compared to systemic therapies.In addition to well-established treatment options such as hyaluronic acid (HA), cortico-steroids (CS) and oxygen-ozone therapy, many other promising products have been employed in the last decades such as polydeoxyribonucleotide (PDRN) and biologic agents such as platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). Moreover, ultrasound-guided intra-meniscal injection and X-ray-guided subchondral injection techniques have been introduced into clinical practice.Even when not supported by high evidence consensus, intra-articular CS and HA injections have gained precise indications for symptomatic relief and clinical improvement in OA. Biological products are strongly supported by in vitro evidence but there is still a lack of robust clinical evidence. PRP and MSCs seem to relieve OA symptoms through a regulation of the joint homeostasis, even if their capability to restore articular cartilage is still to be proved in vivo.Due to increasing interest in the subchondral bone pathology, subchondral injections have been developed with promising results in delaying joint replacement. Nevertheless, due to their recent development and the heterogeneity of the injected products (biologic agents or calcium phosphate), this approach still lacks strong enough evidence to be fully endorsed.Combined biological treatments, nano-molecular approaches, monoclonal antibodies and 'personalized' target therapies are currently under development or under investigation with the aim of expanding our armamentarium against knee OA. Cite this article: 2021;6:501-509. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210026.
膝关节骨关节炎是一种退行性疾病,其特征为软骨进行性退化、软骨下损伤和骨重塑。在为实现症状缓解和功能改善而采用的各种方法中,注射治疗因其相较于全身治疗具有关节内给药且副作用较小的可能性而受到越来越多的关注。除了透明质酸(HA)、皮质类固醇(CS)和氧-臭氧疗法等成熟的治疗选择外,在过去几十年中还应用了许多其他有前景的产品,如聚脱氧核糖核苷酸(PDRN)以及生物制剂,如富血小板血浆(PRP)和间充质干细胞(MSC)。此外,超声引导下半月板内注射和X线引导下软骨下注射技术已引入临床实践。即使缺乏高证据共识的支持,关节内注射CS和HA在OA的症状缓解和临床改善方面也已获得明确的适应证。生物制品得到了体外证据的有力支持,但仍缺乏强有力的临床证据。PRP和MSC似乎通过调节关节内环境稳定来缓解OA症状,尽管它们恢复关节软骨的能力仍有待在体内得到证实。由于对软骨下骨病理学的兴趣日益增加,已开发出软骨下注射技术,在延迟关节置换方面取得了有前景的结果。然而,由于其发展时间较短且注射产品(生物制剂或磷酸钙)具有异质性,这种方法仍缺乏足够有力的证据来获得充分认可。联合生物治疗、纳米分子方法、单克隆抗体和“个性化”靶向治疗目前正在研发或研究中,旨在扩充我们对抗膝关节OA的手段。引用本文:2021;6:501 - 509。DOI:10.1302/2058 - 5241.6.210026。