Bebiş Hatice, Moorhead Sue, Gençbaş Dercan, Özdemir Serpil, Seven Memnun
Department of Public Health Nursing, Near East University, Nicosia, Cyprus.
The University of Iowa College of Nursing, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Florence Nightingale Hemsire Derg. 2019 Oct 1;27(3):284-303. doi: 10.26650/FNJN386150. eCollection 2019 Oct.
The aim of this study was to review interventional studies conducted by nurses about elderly people with urinary incontinence in nursing homes and to match the results to standardized nursing terminology using the Nursing Interventions Classification and the Nursing Outcomes Classification Linkages to the NANDA-I diagnoses guidelines.
A systematic review of quantitative intervention studies was conducted using the PRISMA statement as a guide. The interventional research in English was scanned using the MEDLINE and CINAHL databases from January 2005 to May 2015. Fourteen studies that had at least one nurse researcher were conducted in nursing homes, excluding surgical and pharmacological interventions. The Nursing Outcome Classification and Nursing Intervention Classification Linkages to NANDA-I diagnoses and the Clinical Conditions Part II-U List were used as a guide to select North American Nursing Diagnosis Association International nursing diagnoses, Nursing Outcome Classification Scales, and Nursing Interventions from the data.
We found the frequency of use of various NANDA-I diagnoses, Nursing Interventions, and Nursing Outcomes based on the Nursing Outcomes Classification and Nursing Interventions Classification Linkages to NANDA-I diagnoses and the Clinical Conditions List for incontinence.
Using the Nursing Outcomes Classification and Nursing Interventions Classification Linkages to NANDA-I diagnoses guide may provide new nursing perspectives on non-standardized research. In future studies, this may allow a comparison of data worldwide, enabling nurses to use the results in evidence-based practices.
本研究旨在回顾护士针对养老院中尿失禁老年人开展的干预性研究,并根据《护理干预分类法》和《护理结局分类法与北美护理诊断协会国际诊断指南的联系》将结果与标准化护理术语进行匹配。
以PRISMA声明为指导,对定量干预性研究进行系统回顾。利用MEDLINE和CINAHL数据库检索2005年1月至2015年5月期间的英文干预性研究。排除手术和药物干预,选取了14项至少有一名护士研究人员参与的、在养老院开展的研究。以《护理结局分类法与北美护理诊断协会国际诊断的联系》以及《临床状况第二部分-U清单》为指导,从数据中选取北美护理诊断协会国际护理诊断、护理结局分类量表和护理干预措施。
基于《护理结局分类法》以及《护理干预分类法与北美护理诊断协会国际诊断的联系》和失禁临床状况清单,我们发现了各种北美护理诊断协会国际诊断、护理干预和护理结局的使用频率。
使用《护理结局分类法与北美护理诊断协会国际诊断的联系》指南可能会为非标准化研究提供新的护理视角。在未来的研究中,这可能有助于全球范围内的数据比较,使护士能够将研究结果应用于循证实践。