Noh Hyun Kyung, Lee Eunjoo
Department of Nursing, Gyeongsan University, Daegu, Korea.
Int J Nurs Knowl. 2015 Jan;26(1):43-51. doi: 10.1111/2047-3095.12044. Epub 2014 Sep 8.
The purpose of this study was to identify NANDA-I, Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC), and Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC; NNN) linkages used by Korean nursing students during their clinical practice in medical-surgical units.
A comparative descriptive research design was used to measure the effects of nursing interventions from 153 nursing students in South Korea. Nursing students selected NNN using a Web-based nursing process documentation system. Data were analyzed by paired t-test.
Eighty-two NANDA-I diagnoses, 116 NOC outcomes, and 163 NIC interventions were identified. Statistically significant differences in patients' preintervention and postintervention outcome scores were observed.
By determining patient outcomes linked to interventions and how the degree of outcomes change after interventions, the effectiveness of the interventions can be evaluated.
本研究旨在确定韩国护理专业学生在内科-外科病房临床实习期间所使用的北美护理诊断协会（NANDA-I）、护理结局分类（NOC）和护理干预分类（NIC；NNN）之间的联系。
采用比较描述性研究设计，对韩国153名护理专业学生的护理干预效果进行测量。护理专业学生使用基于网络的护理流程记录系统选择NNN。数据采用配对t检验进行分析。
确定了82项NANDA-I诊断、116项NOC结局和163项NIC干预措施。观察到患者干预前和干预后结局得分存在统计学显著差异。
通过确定与干预措施相关的患者结局以及干预后结局变化的程度，可以评估干预措施的有效性。
