• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
NANDA International nursing diagnoses in the coping/stress tolerance domain and their linkages to Nursing Outcomes Classification outcomes and Nursing Interventions Classification interventions in the pre-hospital emergency care.在院前急救中,NANDA International 护理诊断中的应对/应激耐受领域及其与护理结局分类结局和护理干预分类干预的联系。
J Adv Nurs. 2022 Oct;78(10):3273-3289. doi: 10.1111/jan.15280. Epub 2022 May 4.
2
Prevalence and clustering of NANDA-I nursing diagnoses in the pre-hospital emergency care setting: A retrospective records review study.在院前急救环境中 NANDA-I 护理诊断的流行率和聚类:一项回顾性记录审查研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2024 Aug;33(8):3128-3144. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16996. Epub 2024 Jan 18.
3
NANDA-I, NOC, and NIC Linkages to SARS-Cov-2 (Covid-19): Part 1. Community Response.NANDA-I、NOC 和 NIC 与 SARS-CoV-2(新冠病毒)的关联:第 1 部分。社区应对。
Int J Nurs Knowl. 2021 Jan;32(1):59-67. doi: 10.1111/2047-3095.12291. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
4
NANDA-I, NOC, and NIC linkages to SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19): Part 2. Individual response.NANDA-I、NOC 和 NIC 与 SARS-CoV-2(COVID-19)的关联:第 2 部分。个体反应。
Int J Nurs Knowl. 2021 Jan;32(1):68-83. doi: 10.1111/2047-3095.12307. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
5
Advanced Nursing Process quality: Comparing the International Classification for Nursing Practice (ICNP) with the NANDA-International (NANDA-I) and Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC).高级护理程序质量:比较国际护理实践分类法(ICNP)与国际护士会护理诊断分类(NANDA - I)及护理干预分类法(NIC)。
J Clin Nurs. 2017 Feb;26(3-4):379-387. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13387. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
6
NANDA-I, NOC, and NIC linkages to SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19): Part 3. Family response.NANDA-I、NOC 和 NIC 与 SARS-CoV-2(COVID-19)的关联:第 3 部分。家庭反应。
Int J Nurs Knowl. 2022 Jan;33(1):5-17. doi: 10.1111/2047-3095.12323. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
7
Identification of North American Nursing Diagnosis Association-Nursing Interventions Classification-Nursing Outcomes Classification of nursing home residents using on-time data by android smartphone application by registered nurses.利用注册护士的安卓智能手机应用程序,通过按时数据识别养老院居民的北美护理诊断协会-护理干预分类-护理结局分类。
Int J Nurs Knowl. 2024 Jan;35(1):46-68. doi: 10.1111/2047-3095.12419. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
8
NOC/NIC Linkages to NANDA-I for Continence Care of Elderly People with Urinary Incontinence in Nursing Homes: A Systematic Review.养老院中尿失禁老年人失禁护理的NOC/NIC与NANDA-I的联系:一项系统评价
Florence Nightingale Hemsire Derg. 2019 Oct 1;27(3):284-303. doi: 10.26650/FNJN386150. eCollection 2019 Oct.
9
Application of NANDA-I nursing diagnoses, nursing interventions classification, and nursing outcomes classification in research and practice of cardiac rehabilitation nursing: A scoping review.NANDA-I 护理诊断、护理干预分类和护理结局分类在心脏康复护理研究和实践中的应用:范围综述。
Int J Nurs Knowl. 2024 Jul;35(3):256-271. doi: 10.1111/2047-3095.12441. Epub 2023 Aug 21.
10
Relationships among NANDA-I diagnoses, nursing outcomes classification, and nursing interventions classification by nursing students for patients in medical-surgical units in Korea.韩国护理专业学生对内科-外科病房患者的NANDA-I护理诊断、护理结局分类和护理干预分类之间的关系。
Int J Nurs Knowl. 2015 Jan;26(1):43-51. doi: 10.1111/2047-3095.12044. Epub 2014 Sep 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Clinical Care Classification system.临床护理分类系统的翻译与文化调适。
Int J Med Inform. 2021 Sep;153:104534. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104534. Epub 2021 Jul 16.
2
Effectiveness of Standardized Nursing Terminologies for Nursing Practice and Healthcare Outcomes: A Systematic Review.标准化护理术语在护理实践和医疗保健结果中的有效性:一项系统评价。
Int J Nurs Knowl. 2021 Oct;32(4):220-228. doi: 10.1111/2047-3095.12315. Epub 2021 Feb 12.
3
NANDA-I, NOC, and NIC linkages to SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19): Part 2. Individual response.NANDA-I、NOC 和 NIC 与 SARS-CoV-2(COVID-19)的关联:第 2 部分。个体反应。
Int J Nurs Knowl. 2021 Jan;32(1):68-83. doi: 10.1111/2047-3095.12307. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
4
Present and future of pre-hospital emergency medical system.院前急救医疗系统的现状与未来。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2020 Dec;27(6):402-403. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000737.
5
Feeling safe or unsafe in prehospital emergency care: A qualitative study of the experiences of patients, carers and healthcare professionals.在院前急救护理中感到安全或不安全:对患者、护理人员和医护专业人员的经验的定性研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2020 Dec;29(23-24):4720-4732. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15513. Epub 2020 Oct 11.
6
NANDA-I, NOC, and NIC Linkages to SARS-Cov-2 (Covid-19): Part 1. Community Response.NANDA-I、NOC 和 NIC 与 SARS-CoV-2(新冠病毒)的关联:第 1 部分。社区应对。
Int J Nurs Knowl. 2021 Jan;32(1):59-67. doi: 10.1111/2047-3095.12291. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
7
Prevalence of out-of-hospital nursing diagnosis for patients with chronic conditions: improving our understanding of complexity.慢性病患者院外护理诊断的患病率:加深我们对复杂性的理解。
Emergencias. 2020 Jun;32(3):211-212.
8
NANDA-I, NOC, and NIC Linkages for Nutritional Problems.NANDA-I、NOC 和 NIC 与营养问题的关联。
Int J Nurs Knowl. 2020 Oct;31(4):246-252. doi: 10.1111/2047-3095.12279. Epub 2020 Mar 17.
9
Validation of an uncertainty of illness scale adapted to use with Spanish emergency department patients and their accompanying relatives or friends.验证一种经改编后适用于西班牙急诊科患者及其陪同的亲属或朋友的疾病不确定感量表。
Emergencias. 2018;30(2):105-114.
10
[Factors related to lack of autonomous mobility during out-of-hospital emergency care].[院外急救期间自主移动能力缺失的相关因素]
Emergencias. 2016 Oct;28(5):340-344.

在院前急救中,NANDA International 护理诊断中的应对/应激耐受领域及其与护理结局分类结局和护理干预分类干预的联系。

NANDA International nursing diagnoses in the coping/stress tolerance domain and their linkages to Nursing Outcomes Classification outcomes and Nursing Interventions Classification interventions in the pre-hospital emergency care.

机构信息

Empresa Pública de Emergencias Sanitarias (EPES), Servicio Provincial de Cádiz, Cádiz, Spain.

Research Group under the Andalusian Research, Development and Innovation Scheme CTS-1019 MELES "Nursing methods and Standardized Languages", Universidad de Cádiz, Cádiz, Spain.

出版信息

J Adv Nurs. 2022 Oct;78(10):3273-3289. doi: 10.1111/jan.15280. Epub 2022 May 4.

DOI:10.1111/jan.15280
PMID:35506570
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9545537/
Abstract

AIM

To determine the prevalence of NANDA International nursing diagnoses in the coping/stress tolerance domain and their linkages to Nursing Outcomes Classification outcomes and Nursing Interventions Classification interventions in the pre-hospital emergency care setting.

DESIGN

Retrospective descriptive study of electronic record review.

METHODS

Eight thousand three hundred three episodes recorded during the year 2019 were recovered from the electronic health records of a public emergency care agency. The prevalence of NANDA International nursing diagnosis, Nursing Outcomes Classification outcomes and Nursing Interventions Classification interventions was determined. A cross-tabulation analysis was performed to determine the linkages. Data were accessed in November 2020.

RESULTS

NANDA International nursing diagnoses Anxiety (00146) and Fear (00148) represented more than 90% of the diagnoses recorded in the domain. Anxiety level (1211) and emotional support (5270) were the most recorded Nursing Outcomes Classification outcomes and Nursing Interventions Classification interventions, with almost 20% and 5% of total records, respectively. The linkage between nursing diagnosis Anxiety (00146), outcome Anxiety level (1211) and intervention Anxiety reduction (5820) was the most recorded with slightly more than 3% of the total.

CONCLUSION

Eight different NANDA International nursing diagnoses in the coping/stress tolerance domain were recorded. Nursing Outcomes Classification outcomes were selected aimed mainly at psychological well-being and Nursing Interventions Classification interventions to support coping. In general, linkages were aimed to provide emotional support, physical well-being, information, education and safety.

IMPACT

This study showed that pre-hospital emergency care nurses diagnose and treat human responses in the coping/stress tolerance domain. Expert consensus-based linkages may be complemented by the results of this study, increasing the levels of evidence of both individualized and standardized care plans for critical patients assisted by pre-hospital emergency care nurses.

摘要

目的

确定 NANDA 国际护理诊断在应对/应激耐受领域的流行情况,以及它们与护理结局分类结局和护理干预分类干预在院前急救环境中的联系。

设计

电子病历回顾的回顾性描述性研究。

方法

从一家公立急救机构的电子健康记录中恢复了 2019 年记录的 8303 个病例。确定了 NANDA 国际护理诊断、护理结局分类结局和护理干预分类干预的流行情况。进行了交叉表分析以确定联系。数据于 2020 年 11 月获取。

结果

NANDA 国际护理诊断焦虑症(00146)和恐惧症(00148)占该领域记录的诊断的 90%以上。焦虑程度(1211)和情感支持(5270)是记录最多的护理结局分类结局和护理干预分类干预,分别占总记录的近 20%和 5%。护理诊断焦虑症(00146)、结局焦虑程度(1211)和干预焦虑减轻(5820)之间的联系记录最多,略多于总记录的 3%。

结论

在应对/应激耐受领域记录了 8 种不同的 NANDA 国际护理诊断。选择护理结局分类结局主要是为了心理健康,护理干预分类干预是为了支持应对。一般来说,联系旨在提供情感支持、身体舒适、信息、教育和安全。

影响

本研究表明,院前急救护士在应对/应激耐受领域诊断和治疗人类反应。基于专家共识的联系可以补充本研究的结果,增加院前急救护士协助的危重症患者个体化和标准化护理计划的证据水平。