Treves Adrian, Santiago-Ávila Francisco J, Putrevu Karann
Nelson Institute for Environmental Studies, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, United States.
PeerJ. 2021 Jul 5;9:e11666. doi: 10.7717/peerj.11666. eCollection 2021.
Predators and their protection are controversial worldwide. Gray wolves, , lost U.S. federal protection (delisting) and the State of Wisconsin began lethal management first among all states and tribes that regained authority over wolves. Here we evaluated the initial success of reaching the state's explicit objective, "…to allow for a sustainable harvest that neither increases nor decreases the state's wolf population…" We used official state figures for hunter-killed wolves, population estimates from April 2017-2020, and the latest peer-reviewed model of individual wolf survival to estimate additional deaths resulting from federal delisting. More than half of the additional deaths were predicted to be cryptic poaching under the assumption that this period resembled past periods of liberalized wolf-killing in Wisconsin. We used a precautionary approach to construct three conservative scenarios to predict the current status of this wolf population and a minimum estimate of population decline since April 2020. From our scenarios that vary in growth rates and additional mortality estimates, we expect a maximum of 695-751 wolves to be alive in Wisconsin by 15 April 2021, a minimum 27-33% decline in the preceding 12 months. This contradicts the state expectation of no change in the population size. We draw a conclusion about the adequacy of regulatory mechanisms under state control of wolves and discuss the particular governance conditions met in Wisconsin. We recommend greater rigor and independent review of the science used by agencies to plan wolf hunting quotas and methods. We recommend clearer division of duties between state wildlife agencies, legislatures, and courts. We recommend federal governments reconsider the practice of sudden deregulation of wolf management and instead recommend they consider protecting predators as non-game or transition more slowly to subnational authority, to avoid the need for emergency relisting.
食肉动物及其保护问题在全球范围内都存在争议。灰狼在美国失去了联邦保护(不再受保护),威斯康星州率先在所有重新获得对狼管理权力的州和部落中开始了致命管理。在此,我们评估了该州实现其明确目标的初步成效,即“……实现可持续的狩猎量,使该州狼的数量既不增加也不减少……”。我们使用该州官方公布的猎人捕杀狼的数字、2017年4月至2020年的种群估计数,以及最新的经过同行评审的个体狼生存模型,来估计联邦解除保护后导致的额外死亡数量。假设这段时期类似于威斯康星州过去狼捕杀自由化时期,预计超过一半的额外死亡将是隐蔽偷猎造成的。我们采用预防措施构建了三种保守情景,以预测该狼种群的当前状况以及自2020年4月以来种群减少的最低估计数。从我们在增长率和额外死亡率估计方面各不相同的情景来看,预计到2021年4月15日,威斯康星州存活的狼最多为695 - 751只,在前12个月里最少减少27% - 33%。这与该州期望的种群数量不变相矛盾。我们就该州对狼的管理控制下监管机制的充分性得出结论,并讨论了威斯康星州所面临的特殊治理情况。我们建议对各机构用于规划狼狩猎配额和方法的科学依据进行更严格和独立的审查。我们建议在州野生动物机构、立法机构和法院之间更明确地划分职责。我们建议联邦政府重新考虑突然放松对狼管理的做法,相反,建议他们将食肉动物视为非狩猎动物加以保护,或者更缓慢地向地方政府权力过渡,以避免紧急重新列入保护名单的必要性。