• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国威斯康星州放宽对濒危狼群的捕杀规定后,佩戴项圈的狼个体失踪数量有所增加。

Liberalizing the killing of endangered wolves was associated with more disappearances of collared individuals in Wisconsin, USA.

机构信息

Nelson Institute for Environmental Studies, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, USA.

Department of Biostatistics & Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2020 Aug 17;10(1):13881. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-70837-x.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-020-70837-x
PMID:32807840
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7431570/
Abstract

Although poaching (illegal killing) is an important cause of death for large carnivores globally, the effect of lethal management policies on poaching is unknown for many populations. Two opposing hypotheses have been proposed: liberalizing killing may decrease poaching incidence ('tolerance hunting') or increase it ('facilitated poaching'). For gray wolves in Wisconsin, USA, we evaluated how five causes of death and disappearances of monitored, adult wolves were influenced by policy changes. We found slight decreases in reported wolf poaching hazard and incidence during six liberalized killing periods, but that was outweighed by larger increases in hazard and incidence of disappearance. Although the observed increase in the hazard of disappearance cannot be definitively shown to have been caused by an increase in cryptic poaching, we discuss two additional independent lines of evidence making this the most likely explanation for changing incidence among n = 513 wolves' deaths or disappearances during 12 replicated changes in policy. Support for the facilitated poaching hypothesis suggests the increase (11-34%) in disappearances reflects that poachers killed more wolves and concealed more evidence when the government relaxed protections for endangered wolves. We propose a refinement of the hypothesis of 'facilitated poaching' that narrows the cognitive and behavioral mechanisms underlying wolf-killing.

摘要

虽然偷猎(非法捕杀)是全球大型食肉动物的重要死亡原因,但对于许多种群来说,致死性管理政策对偷猎的影响尚不清楚。有两种相反的假设被提出:放宽捕杀限制可能会减少偷猎事件的发生(“宽容狩猎”),也可能会增加偷猎事件的发生(“促进偷猎”)。在美国威斯康星州的灰狼身上,我们评估了五种导致监测到的成年狼死亡和失踪的原因是如何受到政策变化的影响的。我们发现,在六个放宽限制的捕杀时期,报告的狼偷猎危险和发生率略有下降,但失踪危险和发生率的上升幅度更大。尽管观察到的失踪危险增加不能被明确证明是由于秘密偷猎的增加造成的,但我们讨论了另外两个独立的证据线索,这使得这最有可能解释在政策变化的 12 个重复期间,513 只狼的死亡或失踪事件中发生率的变化。支持“促进偷猎”假说表明,随着政府放松对濒危狼的保护,偷猎者杀害的狼更多,隐藏的证据更多,这导致失踪率(增加 11%至 34%)上升。我们提出了对“促进偷猎”假说的细化,缩小了导致狼被杀的认知和行为机制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2344/7431570/88a27e0fa5c6/41598_2020_70837_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2344/7431570/ddf06a818ac1/41598_2020_70837_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2344/7431570/53bdf769963e/41598_2020_70837_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2344/7431570/88a27e0fa5c6/41598_2020_70837_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2344/7431570/ddf06a818ac1/41598_2020_70837_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2344/7431570/53bdf769963e/41598_2020_70837_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2344/7431570/88a27e0fa5c6/41598_2020_70837_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Liberalizing the killing of endangered wolves was associated with more disappearances of collared individuals in Wisconsin, USA.美国威斯康星州放宽对濒危狼群的捕杀规定后,佩戴项圈的狼个体失踪数量有所增加。
Sci Rep. 2020 Aug 17;10(1):13881. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-70837-x.
2
Poaching of protected wolves fluctuated seasonally and with non-wolf hunting.偷猎受保护的狼会随季节和非猎狼行为而波动。
Sci Rep. 2022 Feb 2;12(1):1738. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-05679-w.
3
Evaluating how management policies affect red wolf mortality and disappearance.评估管理政策如何影响红狼的死亡率和消失情况。
R Soc Open Sci. 2022 May 24;9(5):210400. doi: 10.1098/rsos.210400. eCollection 2022 May.
4
Evaluating how lethal management affects poaching of Mexican wolves.评估致死管理措施如何影响墨西哥狼的偷猎情况。
R Soc Open Sci. 2021 Mar 10;8(3):200330. doi: 10.1098/rsos.200330.
5
Blood does not buy goodwill: allowing culling increases poaching of a large carnivore.金钱买不来善意:允许捕杀会增加对大型食肉动物的偷猎行为。
Proc Biol Sci. 2016 May 11;283(1830). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2015.2939.
6
Gray wolf mortality patterns in Wisconsin from 1979 to 2012.1979年至2012年威斯康星州灰狼的死亡模式。
J Mammal. 2017 Feb 8;98(1):17-32. doi: 10.1093/jmammal/gyw145. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
7
Estimating poaching risk for the critically endangered wild red wolf (Canis rufus).估算极度濒危的野生红狼(Canis rufus)的偷猎风险。
PLoS One. 2021 May 5;16(5):e0244261. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244261. eCollection 2021.
8
Quantifying the effects of delisting wolves after the first state began lethal management.在第一个州开始进行致命管理后,对狼被除名的影响进行量化。
PeerJ. 2021 Jul 5;9:e11666. doi: 10.7717/peerj.11666. eCollection 2021.
9
Shoot, shovel and shut up: cryptic poaching slows restoration of a large carnivore in Europe.射杀、掩埋与闭嘴:隐秘偷猎减缓了欧洲大型食肉动物的恢复进程。
Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Mar 7;279(1730):910-5. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2011.1275. Epub 2011 Aug 17.
10
Changing the Tolerance of the Intolerant: Does Large Carnivore Policy Matter?改变偏执者的容忍度:大型食肉动物政策重要吗?
Animals (Basel). 2024 Aug 15;14(16):2358. doi: 10.3390/ani14162358.

引用本文的文献

1
Uncertainty and precaution in hunting wolves twice in a year: Reanalysis of Treves and Louchouarn: Reply to Stauffer et al.一年两次猎狼中的不确定性与预防措施:对特雷维斯和卢乔恩的重新分析:对施陶弗等人的回应
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 25;20(3):e0319800. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319800. eCollection 2025.
2
Changing the Tolerance of the Intolerant: Does Large Carnivore Policy Matter?改变偏执者的容忍度:大型食肉动物政策重要吗?
Animals (Basel). 2024 Aug 15;14(16):2358. doi: 10.3390/ani14162358.
3
Evaluating how management policies affect red wolf mortality and disappearance.

本文引用的文献

1
Scientists rise up against statistical significance.科学家们奋起反对统计显著性。
Nature. 2019 Mar;567(7748):305-307. doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-00857-9.
2
Mismeasured mortality: correcting estimates of wolf poaching in the United States.误测的死亡率:校正美国狼偷猎情况的估计
J Mammal. 2017 Oct 3;98(5):1256-1264. doi: 10.1093/jmammal/gyx052. Epub 2017 May 19.
3
Gray wolf mortality patterns in Wisconsin from 1979 to 2012.1979年至2012年威斯康星州灰狼的死亡模式。
评估管理政策如何影响红狼的死亡率和消失情况。
R Soc Open Sci. 2022 May 24;9(5):210400. doi: 10.1098/rsos.210400. eCollection 2022 May.
4
Uncertainty and precaution in hunting wolves twice in a year.一年两次猎狼存在不确定性和预防措施。
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 16;17(3):e0259604. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259604. eCollection 2022.
5
Poaching of protected wolves fluctuated seasonally and with non-wolf hunting.偷猎受保护的狼会随季节和非猎狼行为而波动。
Sci Rep. 2022 Feb 2;12(1):1738. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-05679-w.
6
Quantifying the effects of delisting wolves after the first state began lethal management.在第一个州开始进行致命管理后,对狼被除名的影响进行量化。
PeerJ. 2021 Jul 5;9:e11666. doi: 10.7717/peerj.11666. eCollection 2021.
7
Evaluating how lethal management affects poaching of Mexican wolves.评估致死管理措施如何影响墨西哥狼的偷猎情况。
R Soc Open Sci. 2021 Mar 10;8(3):200330. doi: 10.1098/rsos.200330.
8
Estimating poaching risk for the critically endangered wild red wolf (Canis rufus).估算极度濒危的野生红狼(Canis rufus)的偷猎风险。
PLoS One. 2021 May 5;16(5):e0244261. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244261. eCollection 2021.
J Mammal. 2017 Feb 8;98(1):17-32. doi: 10.1093/jmammal/gyw145. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
4
Compensatory mortality in a recovering top carnivore: wolves in Wisconsin, USA (1979-2013).一种正在恢复的顶级食肉动物的补偿性死亡率:美国威斯康星州的狼(1979 - 2013年)
Oecologia. 2018 May;187(1):99-111. doi: 10.1007/s00442-018-4132-4. Epub 2018 Apr 7.
5
Reply to comments by Olson . 2017 and Stien 2017.对奥尔森2017年及施泰因2017年评论的回复。
Proc Biol Sci. 2017 Nov 29;284(1867). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.1743.
6
Flawed analysis and unconvincing interpretation: a comment on Chapron and Treves 2016.有缺陷的分析与难以令人信服的解读:对沙普龙和特雷维斯2016年文章的评论
Proc Biol Sci. 2017 Nov 29;284(1867). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.0273.
7
Correction to 'Blood does not buy goodwill: allowing culling increases poaching of a large carnivore'.对《血液买不来善意:允许捕杀会增加大型食肉动物的偷猎行为》的勘误
Proc Biol Sci. 2016 Dec 28;283(1845). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2016.2577.
8
Let's stay together? Intrinsic and extrinsic factors involved in pair bond dissolution in a recolonizing wolf population.我们在一起好吗?重新定居的狼群中配偶关系解体所涉及的内在和外在因素。
J Anim Ecol. 2017 Jan;86(1):43-54. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12587. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
9
Blood does not buy goodwill: allowing culling increases poaching of a large carnivore.金钱买不来善意:允许捕杀会增加对大型食肉动物的偷猎行为。
Proc Biol Sci. 2016 May 11;283(1830). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2015.2939.
10
Introduction to the Analysis of Survival Data in the Presence of Competing Risks.存在竞争风险时生存数据的分析导论
Circulation. 2016 Feb 9;133(6):601-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.017719.