• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Reply to comments by Olson . 2017 and Stien 2017.对奥尔森2017年及施泰因2017年评论的回复。
Proc Biol Sci. 2017 Nov 29;284(1867). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.1743.
2
Reply to A.C. Olson et al, R.T. Dess et al, D.D. Yang et al, and R.J. Brenneman et al.回复A.C. 奥尔森等人、R.T. 德丝等人、D.D. 杨等人以及R.J. 布伦内曼等人
J Clin Oncol. 2021 Sep 1;39(25):2848-2849. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.00810. Epub 2021 Jun 4.
3
Comment on Tachibana's reply to Buelke-Sam et al., Springer et al., and Gaylor regarding reply to: comments on "Behavioral teratogenic effect of methylmercury and d-amphetamine: meta-analysis and power analysis of data from the Collaborative Behavioral Teratology Study of National Center for Toxicological Research.关于橘田对布尔克 - 萨姆等人、施普林格等人以及盖勒就回复《甲基汞和右旋苯丙胺的行为致畸效应：国家毒理学研究中心协作行为致畸学研究数据的荟萃分析和功效分析》的评论的回复的评论
Teratology. 1991 Mar;43(3):189-90. doi: 10.1002/tera.1420430302.
4
Revisiting the chronology of the Proto-Aurignacian and the Early Aurignacian in Europe: a reply to Higham et al.'s comments on Banks et al. (2013).重新审视欧洲原奥瑞纳文化期和早期奥瑞纳文化期的年表：对海厄姆等人对班克斯等人（2013年）评论的回应
J Hum Evol. 2013 Dec;65(6):810-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2013.08.004. Epub 2013 Oct 3.
5
Comments on the Letter to the Editor of Jie Weng et al. concerning "Relationship between preoperative serum rapid turnover proteins and early-stage surgical wound infection after spine surgery" by D. Kudo et al. (Eur Spine J; 2016: doi:10.1007/s00586-016-4855-z) as well as the Reply of D. Kudo et al. (Eur Spine J; 2018: doi:10.1007/s00586-018-5560-x).对翁杰等人致编辑的信的评论，该信涉及工藤敦等人的“脊柱手术后术前血清快速周转蛋白与早期手术伤口感染之间的关系”（《欧洲脊柱杂志》；2016年：doi:10.1007/s00586-016-4855-z）以及工藤敦等人的回复（《欧洲脊柱杂志》；2018年：doi:10.1007/s00586-018-5560-x）。
Eur Spine J. 2018 May;27(5):985-986. doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5564-6. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
6
Reply to Veerkamp et al.: Comments on Harkness-Armstrong et al. (2021).对维尔坎普等人的回复：对哈克尼斯 - 阿姆斯特朗等人（2021年）的评论。
Exp Physiol. 2022 Dec;107(12):1525-1526. doi: 10.1113/EP090898. Epub 2022 Nov 21.
7
Toward scatter-free phosphors in white phosphor-converted light-emitting diodes: reply to comments.关于白色磷光转换发光二极管中无散射磷光体的回复：对评论的回应
Opt Express. 2013 Feb 25;21(4):5074-6. doi: 10.1364/OE.21.005074.
8
Reply to comments on papers by Lu et al.
Int J Biometeorol. 2016 Jun;60(6):933-4. doi: 10.1007/s00484-015-1098-3. Epub 2015 Nov 6.
9
Reply to comments from Vincent et al.
Int J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jun;22(3):607-608. doi: 10.1007/s10147-017-1093-2. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
10
Reply to comments on the paper by Grasselli et al.对格拉斯利等人论文评论的回复
Theriogenology. 2019 Apr 15;129:179. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2019.02.016.

引用本文的文献

1
Uncertainty and precaution in hunting wolves twice in a year: Reanalysis of Treves and Louchouarn: Reply to Stauffer et al.一年两次猎狼中的不确定性与预防措施：对特雷维斯和卢乔恩的重新分析：对施陶弗等人的回应
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 25;20(3):e0319800. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319800. eCollection 2025.
2
Uncertainty and precaution in hunting wolves twice in a year: Reanalysis of Treves and Louchouarn.一年内两次猎狼的不确定性和预防措施：特雷韦斯和卢肖尔的再分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 12;19(6):e0301487. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301487. eCollection 2024.
3
Uncertainty and precaution in hunting wolves twice in a year.一年两次猎狼存在不确定性和预防措施。
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 16;17(3):e0259604. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259604. eCollection 2022.
4
Quantifying the effects of delisting wolves after the first state began lethal management.在第一个州开始进行致命管理后，对狼被除名的影响进行量化。
PeerJ. 2021 Jul 5;9:e11666. doi: 10.7717/peerj.11666. eCollection 2021.
5
Evaluating how lethal management affects poaching of Mexican wolves.评估致死管理措施如何影响墨西哥狼的偷猎情况。
R Soc Open Sci. 2021 Mar 10;8(3):200330. doi: 10.1098/rsos.200330.
6
Liberalizing the killing of endangered wolves was associated with more disappearances of collared individuals in Wisconsin, USA.美国威斯康星州放宽对濒危狼群的捕杀规定后，佩戴项圈的狼个体失踪数量有所增加。
Sci Rep. 2020 Aug 17;10(1):13881. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-70837-x.
7
Differentiating between regulation and hunting as conservation interventions.区分作为保护干预措施的监管与狩猎。
Conserv Biol. 2019 Apr;33(2):472-475. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13211. Epub 2018 Oct 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Mismeasured mortality: correcting estimates of wolf poaching in the United States.误测的死亡率：校正美国狼偷猎情况的估计
J Mammal. 2017 Oct 3;98(5):1256-1264. doi: 10.1093/jmammal/gyx052. Epub 2017 May 19.
2
Gray wolf mortality patterns in Wisconsin from 1979 to 2012.1979年至2012年威斯康星州灰狼的死亡模式。
J Mammal. 2017 Feb 8;98(1):17-32. doi: 10.1093/jmammal/gyw145. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
3
Flawed analysis and unconvincing interpretation: a comment on Chapron and Treves 2016.有缺陷的分析与难以令人信服的解读：对沙普龙和特雷维斯2016年文章的评论
Proc Biol Sci. 2017 Nov 29;284(1867). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.0273.
4
Blood may buy goodwill: no evidence for a positive relationship between legal culling and poaching in Wisconsin.血液或许能换来善意：威斯康星州合法捕杀与偷猎之间不存在正相关关系的证据。
Proc Biol Sci. 2017 Nov 29;284(1867). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.0267.
5
Reply to comment by Pepin . 2017.对佩平评论的回复。2017年。
Proc Biol Sci. 2017 Mar 29;284(1851). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2016.2571. Epub 2017 Mar 22.
6
Correction to 'Blood does not buy goodwill: allowing culling increases poaching of a large carnivore'.对《血液买不来善意：允许捕杀会增加大型食肉动物的偷猎行为》的勘误
Proc Biol Sci. 2016 Dec 28;283(1845). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2016.2577.
7
Blood does not buy goodwill: allowing culling increases poaching of a large carnivore.金钱买不来善意：允许捕杀会增加对大型食肉动物的偷猎行为。
Proc Biol Sci. 2016 May 11;283(1830). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2015.2939.
8
Implications of Harvest on the Boundaries of Protected Areas for Large Carnivore Viewing Opportunities.大型食肉动物观赏机会对保护区边界的收获影响。
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 28;11(4):e0153808. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153808. eCollection 2016.
9
Demographic and Component Allee Effects in Southern Lake Superior Gray Wolves.苏必利尔湖以南灰狼的种群统计学及组分阿利效应
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 1;11(3):e0150535. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150535. eCollection 2016.
10
CONSERVATION POLICY. Questionable policy for large carnivore hunting.保护政策。大型食肉动物狩猎的可疑政策。
Science. 2015 Dec 18;350(6267):1473-5. doi: 10.1126/science.aac4768.

Reply to comments by Olson . 2017 and Stien 2017.

作者信息

Chapron Guillaume, Treves Adrian

机构信息

Grimsö Wildlife Research Station, Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 73091 Riddarhyttan, Sweden

Nelson Institute for Environmental Studies, University of Wisconsin, 30A Science Hall, 550 North Park Street, Madison, WI 53706, USA

出版信息

Proc Biol Sci. 2017 Nov 29;284(1867). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.1743.

DOI:10.1098/rspb.2017.1743
PMID:29167362
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5719172/
Abstract
摘要