Suppr超能文献

一项针对接受大型腹部手术患者的术前微血管保护的随机、多中心、开放性、盲终点、2 期、可行性、疗效和安全性试验。

A Randomized, Multicenter, Open-Label, Blinded End Point, Phase 2, Feasibility, Efficacy, and Safety Trial of Preoperative Microvascular Protection in Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Surgery.

机构信息

From the Department of Intensive Care, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.

Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre (ANZIC-RC), School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Anesth Analg. 2021 Oct 1;133(4):1036-1047. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005667.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The endothelial glycocalyx, a carbohydrate-rich layer coating all endothelial surfaces, plays a fundamental role in the function of microcirculation. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of using dexamethasone and albumin to protect the endothelial glycocalyx in patients undergoing abdominal surgery. Secondary and exploratory outcomes included efficacy and safety.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter, open-label, blinded end point, phase 2, randomized trial. Patients undergoing colorectal, pancreas, or liver surgery were recruited and randomized to receive either intravenous dexamethasone (16 mg) and 20% albumin (100 mL) at induction of anesthesia, then 200 mL of 20% albumin with each subsequent 1000 mL of crystalloid administered (dexamethasone and albumin [Dex-Alb] group), or crystalloid fluid only with no dexamethasone (control group). Feasibility end points included patient recruitment and retention, consent rate, and successful study drug administration. The primary efficacy end point was the measurement of plasma syndecan-1 level on postoperative day (POD) 1, and secondary end points were heparan sulfate levels and inflammatory markers measured at 4 perioperative timepoints. Safety end points included errors in administration of the intervention, hyperglycemia, occurrence of postoperative complications, and patient retention.

RESULTS

Seventy-two patients were randomized. All feasibility end points were achievable. There were no statistically significant differences observed in median (interquartile range) syndecan-1 levels on POD 1 (39 ng·mL-1 [20-97] in the Dex-Alb group versus 41 ng·mL-1 [19-84] in the control group; difference in medians -2.1, 95% confidence interval [CI], -13 to 8.6; P = .69). The Dex-Alb group had lower POD 1 heparan sulfate levels (319 ng·mL-1 [161-717] in the Dex-Alb group versus 1422 [670-2430] ng·mL-1 in the control group; difference in medians -1085, 95% CI, -1779 to -391) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels on POD 1 (48 [29-77] mg·L-1 in the Dex-Alb group versus 85 mg·L-1 [49-133] in the control group; difference in medians -48, 95% CI, -75 to -21). Fewer patients had one or more postoperative complication in the Dex-Alb group than in the control group (6 [17%] vs 18 patients [50%]; odds ratio = 0.2, 95% CI, 0.06-0.6).

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous dexamethasone and albumin administration was feasible but did not reduce syndecan-1 on POD 1 in patients undergoing abdominal surgery. Given the clinically important CIs observed between the groups for heparan sulfate, CRP, and postoperative complications, a larger trial assessing the associations between dexamethasone and albumin administration and these outcomes is warranted.

摘要

背景

内皮糖萼是覆盖所有内皮表面的富含碳水化合物的层,在微循环功能中起着至关重要的作用。本研究的主要目的是评估在接受腹部手术的患者中使用地塞米松和白蛋白来保护内皮糖萼的可行性。次要和探索性结果包括疗效和安全性。

方法

我们进行了一项多中心、开放标签、盲终点、2 期、随机试验。招募接受结直肠、胰腺或肝脏手术的患者,并将其随机分配至麻醉诱导时接受静脉内地塞米松(16mg)和 20%白蛋白(100mL),然后每输注 1000mL 晶体液时输注 20%白蛋白 200mL(地塞米松和白蛋白[Dex-Alb]组),或仅输注晶体液而不使用地塞米松(对照组)。可行性终点包括患者招募和保留、同意率以及成功给予研究药物。主要疗效终点是术后第 1 天(POD)1 时测量血浆 syndecan-1 水平,次要终点是在 4 个围手术期时间点测量硫酸乙酰肝素水平和炎症标志物。安全性终点包括干预措施给药错误、高血糖、术后并发症发生和患者保留。

结果

72 名患者被随机分配。所有可行性终点均可达。Dex-Alb 组 POD1 的中位(四分位距)syndecan-1 水平(39ng·mL-1[20-97])与对照组(41ng·mL-1[19-84])相比无统计学显著差异(中位数差值-2.1,95%置信区间[-13 至 8.6];P=0.69)。Dex-Alb 组 POD1 的硫酸乙酰肝素水平(319ng·mL-1[161-717])和 C 反应蛋白(CRP)水平(48[29-77]mg·L-1)均低于对照组(1422[670-2430]ng·mL-1和 85mg·L-1[49-133];中位数差值-1085,95%置信区间[-1779 至-391])。与对照组相比,Dex-Alb 组发生 1 个或多个术后并发症的患者更少(6[17%]vs18 例患者[50%];比值比=0.2,95%置信区间[0.06-0.6])。

结论

静脉内给予地塞米松和白蛋白是可行的,但并未降低腹部手术患者 POD1 的 syndecan-1 水平。鉴于两组之间观察到的肝素硫酸、CRP 和术后并发症的临床重要置信区间,有必要进行更大规模的试验以评估地塞米松和白蛋白给药与这些结局之间的关联。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验