• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对胜任阅读和阅读障碍的个体认知分析。

Individual cognitive analysis of competent and impaired reading.

作者信息

Seymour P H

机构信息

Department of Psychology, The University, Dundee, Scotland, UK.

出版信息

Br J Psychol. 1987 Nov;78 ( Pt 4):483-506. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1987.tb02264.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1987.tb02264.x
PMID:3427311
Abstract

A cognitive model of basic reading functions is described together with experimental procedures that may be used to investigate the efficiency and operation of its components in individual subjects. Illustrative results obtained from competent and impaired readers aged about 11 years are presented. Competent reading, defined in terms of efficiency within a morphemic route to phonology, may be achieved despite quite marked inefficiencies in adjacent systems, including a grapheme-phoneme translation process. Both these functions are typically impaired in poor readers, although the balance of relative impairment may vary. The index of relative impairment may be used to define subtypes of disability, referred to as phonological dyslexia and morphemic dyslexia. However, this procedure did not identify groups of subjects who shared a common set of processing characteristics. Some theoretical and diagnostic implications are discussed.

摘要

本文描述了一个基本阅读功能的认知模型以及可用于研究个体受试者中其组成部分的效率和运作的实验程序。呈现了从大约11岁的阅读能力正常和有阅读障碍的读者那里获得的说明性结果。尽管相邻系统存在相当明显的低效情况,包括字母音素转换过程,但在词素到音系的路径内,根据效率定义的正常阅读仍可实现。这两种功能在阅读能力差的读者中通常都会受损,尽管相对受损的程度可能有所不同。相对受损指数可用于定义残疾亚型,即语音性阅读障碍和词素性阅读障碍。然而,该程序并未识别出具有共同处理特征集的受试者群体。文中还讨论了一些理论和诊断方面的意义。

相似文献

1
Individual cognitive analysis of competent and impaired reading.对胜任阅读和阅读障碍的个体认知分析。
Br J Psychol. 1987 Nov;78 ( Pt 4):483-506. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1987.tb02264.x.
2
Developmental surface dyslexias.发育性表层失读症
Cortex. 2008 Oct;44(9):1146-60. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2007.09.005. Epub 2008 Mar 4.
3
Grapheme-phoneme correspondence in dyslexic and matched control readers.阅读障碍者与匹配对照组读者的字素-音素对应关系。
Br J Psychol. 1994 Feb;85 ( Pt 1):41-53. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1994.tb02507.x.
4
Comparison of phonological and whole-word treatments for two contrasting cases of developmental dyslexia.发育性阅读障碍两种不同病例的语音治疗与整词治疗比较
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2007 Dec;24(8):817-42. doi: 10.1080/02643290701764207.
5
Getting to grips with the heterogeneity of developmental dyslexia.掌握发展性阅读障碍的异质性。
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2013;30(1):1-24. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2013.784192.
6
Phonological working memory in German children with poor reading and spelling abilities.阅读和拼写能力较差的德国儿童的语音工作记忆
Dyslexia. 2008 Nov;14(4):271-90. doi: 10.1002/dys.357.
7
Phonological coding in good and poor readers.阅读能力强与弱的读者的语音编码
J Exp Child Psychol. 1982 Aug;34(1):93-112. doi: 10.1016/0022-0965(82)90033-9.
8
Semantic and phonological coding in poor and normal readers.阅读能力较差者与正常阅读者的语义和语音编码
J Exp Child Psychol. 1995 Feb;59(1):76-123. doi: 10.1006/jecp.1995.1004.
9
Is a "Phoenician" reading style superior to a "Chinese" reading style? Evidence from fourth graders.“腓尼基式”阅读风格比“中国式”阅读风格更优越吗?来自四年级学生的证据。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2008 Jul;100(3):186-214. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2007.10.005. Epub 2007 Dec 3.
10
Abstract letter identities and developmental dyslexia.抽象字母识别与发展性阅读障碍。
Br J Psychol. 1990 May;81 ( Pt 2):227-63. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1990.tb02358.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical and Electrophysiological Differences between Subjects with Dysphonetic Dyslexia and Non-Specific Reading Delay.语音性诵读困难患者与非特异性阅读延迟患者的临床及电生理差异
Brain Sci. 2018 Sep 10;8(9):172. doi: 10.3390/brainsci8090172.
2
What's the story? The tale of reading fluency told at speed.有何故事?以速度讲述流畅阅读的故事。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2012 Nov;33(11):2572-85. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21384. Epub 2011 Sep 23.