Bali Krittika, Wagg Adrian, Murphy Ruth, Gruneir Andrea
Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton.
TREC Research Program, Faculty of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton.
Can Geriatr J. 2024 Sep 5;27(3):317-323. doi: 10.5770/cgj.27.709. eCollection 2024 Sep.
The quality of medical care provided to older residents in nursing homes may depend upon available staffing models; this study examined the relationship between physician and nurse practitioner (NP) presence, care involvement, and resident outcomes. The secondary analysis of data collected in the Translating Research in Elder Care (TREC) study during 2019-20 included items on daily presence of physicians and NPs on units, physician involvement in care planning, and ability to contact physician or NP when necessary linked to routinely collected Resident Assessment Instrument-Minimum Data Set version 2.0 data. Eight logistic regression models tested the association between measures of staffing involvement and each outcome (antipsychotic use without indication (APM), physical restraint use, hospital transfers, and polypharmacy). The sample consisted of 10,888 residents across 320 care units in 90 facilities. Of the units, 277 (86%) reported a physician or NP visited daily, 160 (72.1%) reported that the physician was involved in care planning, and 318 (99%) units reported that the physician or NP could be reached when needed. Following adjustment for multiple confounding variables, there were no statistically significant associations between presence/involvement of medical professionals and resident outcomes (for example, physician or NP presence on the unit and hospitalization transfers [AOR=1.17, 95% CI: 0.46-3.10] or polypharmacy [AOR=1.37, 95% CI: 0.64-2.93]). We found non-significant associations between medical staff presence and involvement and selected resident outcomes, suggesting either the presence of many unaccounted for confounding inter-related resident-care provider variables or underlying insensitivity of the available data.
养老院为老年居民提供的医疗服务质量可能取决于可用的人员配置模式;本研究调查了医生和执业护士的在场情况、护理参与度与居民结局之间的关系。对2019 - 20年老年护理转化研究(TREC)中收集的数据进行的二次分析包括有关医生和执业护士在各科室的日常在场情况、医生参与护理计划以及必要时联系医生或执业护士的能力的项目,这些项目与常规收集的居民评估工具 - 最低数据集第2.0版数据相关联。八个逻辑回归模型测试了人员配置参与度指标与每个结局(无指征使用抗精神病药物(APM)、使用身体约束、转院和多重用药)之间的关联。样本包括90个机构中320个护理单元的10,888名居民。在这些单元中,277个(86%)报告有医生或执业护士每天来访,160个(72.1%)报告医生参与护理计划,318个(99%)单元报告在需要时可以联系到医生或执业护士。在对多个混杂变量进行调整后,医疗专业人员的在场/参与度与居民结局之间没有统计学上的显著关联(例如,科室中有医生或执业护士在场与转院[AOR = 1.17,95% CI:0.46 - 3.10]或多重用药[AOR = 1.37,95% CI:0.64 - 2.93])。我们发现医务人员的在场和参与度与选定的居民结局之间存在不显著的关联,这表明要么存在许多未考虑到的相互关联的混杂居民 - 护理提供者变量,要么现有数据存在潜在的不敏感性。