• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

媒体中新冠疫苗的政治化:一项批判性话语分析

Politicizing COVID-19 Vaccines in the Press: A Critical Discourse Analysis.

作者信息

Abbas Ali Haif

机构信息

University of Wasit, Wasit, Iraq.

出版信息

Int J Semiot Law. 2022;35(3):1167-1185. doi: 10.1007/s11196-021-09857-3. Epub 2021 Jul 10.

DOI:10.1007/s11196-021-09857-3
PMID:34276142
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8271332/
Abstract

Undoubtedly and unfortunately, COVID-19 pandemic has been politicized in media see Abbas (Int J Semiot Law, 2020), Rui Zhang (Media Asia 48:89-107, 2021). Although vaccines play a crucial role in eliminating the pandemic, they have been politicized by media. This article aims to show how COVID-19 vaccines are politicized in the press. The article collects some selected reports on vaccines taken from American and Chinese media. The reports are analyzed according to an analytical framework suggested by the researcher. The framework and data collection and description are clearly presented in the method section. Based on data analysis, the article shows that COVID-19 vaccines have been politicized. The study recommends that diseases and vaccines should not be politicized. In other words, we should respect and trust science and our scientists for no other purpose than to reach herd immunity and overcome a dangerous pandemic that has taken and is still taking thousands of innocent lives.

摘要

毫无疑问且令人遗憾的是,新冠疫情已在媒体中被政治化(见阿巴斯,《国际符号法杂志》,2020年;张瑞,《亚洲传媒》第48卷:第89 - 107页,2021年)。尽管疫苗在消除疫情方面发挥着关键作用,但它们也被媒体政治化了。本文旨在展示新冠疫苗在媒体中是如何被政治化的。文章收集了一些从美国和中国媒体选取的关于疫苗的报道。这些报道根据研究者提出的分析框架进行分析。该框架以及数据收集和描述在方法部分有清晰呈现。基于数据分析,文章表明新冠疫苗已被政治化。该研究建议疾病和疫苗不应被政治化。换句话说,我们应该尊重和信任科学以及我们的科学家,目的就是实现群体免疫并战胜这场已经且仍在夺走数千无辜生命的危险疫情。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9a1/8271332/f021f3b26517/11196_2021_9857_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9a1/8271332/f021f3b26517/11196_2021_9857_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9a1/8271332/f021f3b26517/11196_2021_9857_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Politicizing COVID-19 Vaccines in the Press: A Critical Discourse Analysis.媒体中新冠疫苗的政治化:一项批判性话语分析
Int J Semiot Law. 2022;35(3):1167-1185. doi: 10.1007/s11196-021-09857-3. Epub 2021 Jul 10.
2
Politicizing the Pandemic: A Schemata Analysis of COVID-19 News in Two Selected Newspapers.将疫情政治化:对两份选定报纸中新冠疫情新闻的图式分析
Int J Semiot Law. 2022;35(3):883-902. doi: 10.1007/s11196-020-09745-2. Epub 2020 Jul 3.
3
Vaccines, media and politics: A corpus-assisted discourse study of press representations of the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines.疫苗、媒体和政治:基于语料库的新冠疫苗安全性和有效性新闻报道的话语研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 30;17(12):e0279500. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279500. eCollection 2022.
4
Toward Achieving a Vaccine-Derived Herd Immunity Threshold for COVID-19 in the U.S.实现美国 COVID-19 疫苗衍生群体免疫阈值
Front Public Health. 2021 Jul 23;9:709369. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.709369. eCollection 2021.
5
Politicizing COVID-19 Lingua in Western and Arab Newspapers: A Critical Discourse Analysis.西方和阿拉伯报纸中新冠疫情相关语言的政治化:一项批判性话语分析
Int J Semiot Law. 2023;36(2):869-892. doi: 10.1007/s11196-022-09933-2. Epub 2022 Aug 27.
6
COVID-19 Information Sources and Misinformation by Faith Community.宗教团体的 COVID-19 信息来源和错误信息
Inquiry. 2022 Jan-Dec;59:469580221081388. doi: 10.1177/00469580221081388.
7
Social media and vaccine hesitancy.社交媒体与疫苗犹豫
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Oct;5(10). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004206. Epub 2020 Oct 23.
8
An analysis of AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine misinformation and fear mongering on Twitter.分析推特上阿斯利康 COVID-19 疫苗错误信息和恐惧言论。
Public Health. 2021 Nov;200:4-6. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2021.08.019. Epub 2021 Aug 30.
9
Will achieving herd immunity be a road to success to end the COVID-19 pandemic?实现群体免疫是否会成为终结 COVID-19 大流行的成功之路?
J Infect. 2021 Sep;83(3):381-412. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2021.06.007. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
10
The Role of Influential Actors in Fostering the Polarized COVID-19 Vaccine Discourse on Twitter: Mixed Methods of Machine Learning and Inductive Coding.有影响力的行为者在推动推特上两极分化的新冠疫苗话语中的作用:机器学习与归纳编码的混合方法
JMIR Infodemiology. 2022 Jun 30;2(1):e34231. doi: 10.2196/34231. eCollection 2022 Jan-Jun.

引用本文的文献

1
COVID-19 vaccines as a game-changing tool? A corpus-based study of vaccine communication in People's Daily and The New York Times.新冠疫苗是一种改变游戏规则的工具?一项基于语料库的《人民日报》与《纽约时报》疫苗相关报道研究
Heliyon. 2025 Jan 17;11(2):e42082. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42082. eCollection 2025 Jan 30.
2
Assessment of Covid-19 vaccine confidence among healthcare personnel in the safety-net sector in the United States and Puerto Rico.美国和波多黎各安全网部门医疗保健人员对 COVID-19 疫苗信心的评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 May 3;24(1):580. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10996-z.
3
One size doesn't fit all: methodological reflections in conducting community-based behavioural science research to tailor COVID-19 vaccination initiatives for public health priority populations.

本文引用的文献

1
Understanding vaccine hesitancy in COVID-19.理解 COVID-19 疫苗犹豫。
Med. 2021 May 14;2(5):498-501. doi: 10.1016/j.medj.2021.04.002. Epub 2021 Apr 8.
2
Trust in a COVID-19 vaccine in the U.S.: A social-ecological perspective.美国对新冠疫苗的信任:一种社会生态视角。
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Feb;270:113684. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113684. Epub 2021 Jan 8.
3
Politicizing the Mask: Political, Economic and Demographic Factors Affecting Mask Wearing Behavior in the USA.口罩政治化:影响美国口罩佩戴行为的政治、经济和人口因素
一刀切不适用:基于社区的行为科学研究方法的反思,以针对公共卫生重点人群调整 COVID-19 疫苗接种计划。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Mar 13;24(1):784. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18270-x.
4
Direct Support Professionals and COVID-19 Vaccination: A Comparison of Vaccinated Early Adopters and In-Betweeners.直接支持专业人员和 COVID-19 疫苗接种:早期接种者和中间接种者的比较。
Intellect Dev Disabil. 2023 Dec 1;61(6):492-505. doi: 10.1352/1934-9556-61.6.492.
5
Media Reporting Relating to COVID-19 Vaccination as a Driver of Vaccine Hesitancy Prior to the Second Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic in India: A Content Analysis of Newspaper and Digital Media Reports.在印度第二波新冠疫情大流行之前,媒体对新冠疫苗接种的报道成为疫苗犹豫的一个驱动因素:报纸和数字媒体报道的内容分析
Cureus. 2023 Mar 27;15(3):e36750. doi: 10.7759/cureus.36750. eCollection 2023 Mar.
6
Understanding underlying moral values and language use of COVID-19 vaccine attitudes on twitter.了解推特上关于新冠疫苗态度的潜在道德价值观和语言使用情况。
PNAS Nexus. 2023 Mar 7;2(3):pgad013. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad013. eCollection 2023 Mar.
7
Redeeming by Unlearning: A Critical Discourse Analysis of COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy on Facebook.通过摒弃旧知实现救赎:对脸书上新冠疫苗犹豫情绪的批判性话语分析
Proc Assoc Inf Sci Technol. 2022;59(1):747-749. doi: 10.1002/pra2.713. Epub 2022 Oct 14.
8
A mixed methods study exploring requests for unproven COVID therapies such as ivermectin and healthcare distrust in the rural South.一项混合方法研究,探讨在南方农村地区对伊维菌素等未经证实的新冠治疗方法的需求以及对医疗保健的不信任。
Prev Med Rep. 2023 Feb;31:102104. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.102104. Epub 2022 Dec 31.
9
Overcoming the effect of pandemic fatigue on vaccine hesitancy-Will belief in science triumph?克服大流行疲劳对疫苗犹豫的影响——对科学的信念会胜利吗?
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2023 Jan;55(1):262-271. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12778. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
10
Stereotyping of the Russian Orthodox Church in Fake News in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Semiotic and Legal Analysis.新冠疫情背景下假新闻中对俄罗斯东正教的刻板印象:符号学与法律分析
Int J Semiot Law. 2022;35(3):1187-1213. doi: 10.1007/s11196-022-09888-4. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
East Econ J. 2021;47(2):163-183. doi: 10.1057/s41302-020-00186-0. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
4
Confidence and Receptivity for COVID-19 Vaccines: A Rapid Systematic Review.对新冠疫苗的信心和接受度:一项快速系统评价
Vaccines (Basel). 2020 Dec 30;9(1):16. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9010016.
5
Politicizing the Pandemic: A Schemata Analysis of COVID-19 News in Two Selected Newspapers.将疫情政治化:对两份选定报纸中新冠疫情新闻的图式分析
Int J Semiot Law. 2022;35(3):883-902. doi: 10.1007/s11196-020-09745-2. Epub 2020 Jul 3.
6
A future vaccination campaign against COVID-19 at risk of vaccine hesitancy and politicisation.未来针对新冠病毒的疫苗接种运动面临疫苗犹豫和政治化的风险。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Jul;20(7):769-770. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30426-6. Epub 2020 May 20.
7
Anti-vaccinationists past and present.过去和现在的反疫苗接种者。
BMJ. 2002 Aug 24;325(7361):430-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7361.430.