Cortes Julian A, Thomas Anice, Hendrick Steve, Janzen Eugene, Pajor Ed A, Orsel Karin
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Production Animal Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Coaldale Veterinary Clinic, Coaldale, Canada.
Transl Anim Sci. 2021 May 13;5(3):txab075. doi: 10.1093/tas/txab075. eCollection 2021 Jul.
Digital dermatitis () has been reported in North American feedlots, although risk factors are not well characterized. Our objectives were to analyze: (1) foot and leg conformation and (2) pen hygiene, as potential variables that predispose feedlot cattle to DD. Production parameters in DD-affected cattle were compared with healthy cattle and with those diagnosed with more commonly known infectious lesion foot rot (). In total, 2,854 feedlot cattle in 11 pens in 2 feedlots were assessed (bi-weekly pen walks) throughout the feeding cycle. Pen condition was categorized as: "dry," "mud present but has good bedding," "more mud than bedding," and "excessive mud." Gait scoring was competed and cattle with abnormal gait or evident foot lesions (i.e., DD or FR) were restrained in a cattle chute for a close foot inspection (=280), including scoring of foot angle and claw set and hind and side views of rear feet and legs. Cumulative incidence of DD (present or absent) and FR was 2.5% (71/2,854) and 11.6% (331/2,854), respectively. Foot and leg conformation was not significantly different between left and right sides or between cattle with (=71) and without DD (=209). Lameness was diagnosed in only 22% of cattle with DD. Cattle with DD gained 0.27 kg/d less compared with healthy cattle (mean ± SD: 1.29 ± 0.29 vs. 1.56 ± 0.27, <0.05) and 0.4 kg/d less compared with FR (1.29 ± 0.29 vs. 1.69 ± 0.25). Presence of DD was not significantly different between pens with "dry" and "mud present but has good bedding," but for pens with "more mud than bedding" or "excessive mud," the risk of cattle having DD cases increased significantly [odds ratio ()=8.55, confidence interval (): 4.0-18.4 and OR=14.1, CI: 5.9-33.8, respectively]. In conclusion, it is important to keep good pen conditions to reduce the risk of DD, which can be managed through proper stocking density and strategic bedding, irrespective of foot and leg conformation.
北美饲养场已报告有数字性皮炎(Digital dermatitis,DD)病例,尽管其风险因素尚未完全明确。我们的目标是分析:(1)蹄腿形态,以及(2)栏舍卫生状况,作为饲养场牛群易患DD的潜在变量。将患DD的牛的生产参数与健康牛以及被诊断患有更常见的传染性病变腐蹄病(foot rot,FR)的牛进行比较。在整个饲养周期中,对两个饲养场11个栏舍中的2854头饲养场牛进行了评估(每两周在栏舍巡查一次)。栏舍状况分为:“干燥”、“有泥但垫料良好”、“泥比垫料多”和“泥过多”。进行了步态评分,步态异常或有明显蹄部病变(即DD或FR)的牛被限制在牛通道中进行仔细的蹄部检查(n = 280),包括蹄角和蹄叉评分以及后蹄和后腿的后侧和侧面视图。DD(存在或不存在)和FR的累积发病率分别为2.5%(71/2854)和11.6%(331/2854)。蹄腿形态在左侧和右侧之间,以及患DD的牛(n = 71)和未患DD的牛(n = 209)之间没有显著差异。仅22%的患DD的牛被诊断为跛行。与健康牛相比,患DD的牛日增重少0.27 kg(平均值±标准差:1.29±0.29 vs. 1.56±0.27,P<0.05),与患FR的牛相比日增重少0.4 kg(1.29±0.29 vs. 1.69±0.25)。在“干燥”和“有泥但垫料良好”的栏舍中,DD的发生率没有显著差异,但对于“泥比垫料多”或“泥过多”的栏舍,牛患DD病例的风险显著增加[优势比(odds ratio,OR)= 8.55,置信区间(confidence interval,CI):4.0 - 18.4;OR = 14.1,CI:5.9 - 33.8]。总之,保持良好的栏舍条件对于降低DD风险很重要,这可以通过适当的饲养密度和合理的垫料管理来实现,而与蹄腿形态无关。