• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

坦桑尼亚农村地区医院分娩服务利用的不平等:2015-2016 年坦桑尼亚人口与健康调查分析。

Inequity in uptake of hospital-based childbirth care in rural Tanzania: analysis of the 2015-16 Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey.

机构信息

Athena Institute, VU Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Sexual and Reproductive Health Group, Department of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nationalestraat 155, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium.

出版信息

Health Policy Plan. 2021 Oct 12;36(9):1428-1440. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czab079.

DOI:10.1093/heapol/czab079
PMID:34279643
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8505858/
Abstract

Proportions of facility births are increasing throughout sub-Saharan Africa, but obstetric services vary within the health system. In Tanzania, advanced management of childbirth complications (comprehensive emergency obstetric care) is offered in hospitals, while in frontline, primary health care (PHC) facilities (health centres and dispensaries) mostly only routine childbirth care is available. With over half (54%) of rural births in facilities, we hypothesized the presence of socio-economic inequity in hospital-based childbirth uptake in rural Tanzania and explored whether this relationship was modified by parity. This inequity may compound the burden of greater mortality among the poorest women and their babies. Records for 4456 rural women from the 2015-16 Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey with a live birth in the preceding 5 years were examined. Proportions of births at each location (home/PHC/hospital) were calculated by demographic and obstetric characteristics. Multinomial logistic regression was used to obtain crude and adjusted odds ratios of home/PHC and hospital/PHC births based on household wealth, including interaction between wealth and parity. Post-estimation margins analysis was applied to estimate childbirth location by wealth and parity. Hospital-based childbirth uptake was inequitable. The gap between poorest and richest was less pronounced at first birth. Hospital-based care utilization was lowest (around 10%) among the poorest multiparous women, with no increase at high parity (≥5) despite higher risk. PHC-based childbirth care was used by a consistent proportion of women after the first birth (range 30-51%). The poorest women utilized it at intermediate parity, but at parity ≥5 mostly gave birth at home. In an effort to provide effective childbirth care to all women, context-specific strategies are required to improve hospital-based care use, and poor, rural, high parity women are a particularly vulnerable group that requires specific attention. Improving childbirth care in PHC and strengthening referral linkages would benefit a considerable proportion of women.

摘要

撒哈拉以南非洲地区的医疗机构分娩比例正在上升,但各医疗机构的产科服务水平存在差异。在坦桑尼亚,高级别的分娩并发症处理(全面的紧急产科护理)仅在医院提供,而在基层、初级卫生保健设施(卫生中心和诊所)中,主要只提供常规分娩护理。由于有超过一半(54%)的农村分娩在医疗机构中进行,我们假设在坦桑尼亚农村,基于医院的分娩率存在社会经济不平等,并探讨了这种关系是否因产次而有所改变。这种不平等可能会使最贫困妇女及其婴儿的死亡率更高。我们对 2015-16 年坦桑尼亚人口与健康调查中 4456 名过去 5 年内活产的农村妇女的记录进行了检查。根据人口统计学和产科特征,计算了每个地点(家中/初级卫生保健/医院)的分娩比例。利用多分类逻辑回归,根据家庭财富获得了家庭/初级卫生保健和医院/初级卫生保健分娩的粗比值比和调整比值比,包括财富和产次之间的交互作用。在估计后,采用边际分析估计按财富和产次划分的分娩地点。基于医院的分娩利用率存在不平等。在初产妇中,最贫穷和最富裕家庭之间的差距不那么明显。最贫穷的多产妇中,利用医院分娩的比例最低(约 10%),尽管风险较高,但在高产次(≥5)时并未增加。在初产妇之后,一直有相当比例的妇女利用初级卫生保健的分娩护理(范围为 30-51%)。最贫穷的妇女在中等产次时利用它,但在产次≥5 时,大多数在家分娩。为了向所有妇女提供有效的分娩护理,需要制定特定于背景的策略来提高基于医院的护理利用率,而贫困、农村、高产次的妇女是一个特别脆弱的群体,需要特别关注。改善初级卫生保健中的分娩护理并加强转诊联系将使相当一部分妇女受益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59ab/8505858/7ac645350f6a/czab079f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59ab/8505858/ab10c91c92ff/czab079f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59ab/8505858/7ac645350f6a/czab079f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59ab/8505858/ab10c91c92ff/czab079f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59ab/8505858/7ac645350f6a/czab079f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Inequity in uptake of hospital-based childbirth care in rural Tanzania: analysis of the 2015-16 Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey.坦桑尼亚农村地区医院分娩服务利用的不平等:2015-2016 年坦桑尼亚人口与健康调查分析。
Health Policy Plan. 2021 Oct 12;36(9):1428-1440. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czab079.
2
No increase in use of hospitals for childbirth in Tanzania over 25 years: Accumulation of inequity among poor, rural, high parity women.坦桑尼亚25年来医院分娩使用率未增:贫困、农村、多胎次妇女之间的不平等加剧。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Aug 15;2(8):e0000345. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000345. eCollection 2022.
3
Where do the rural poor deliver when high coverage of health facility delivery is achieved? Findings from a community and hospital survey in Tanzania.在实现了较高的医疗机构分娩覆盖率的情况下,农村贫困人口在哪里分娩?坦桑尼亚一项社区与医院调查的结果。
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 2;9(12):e113995. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113995. eCollection 2014.
4
A new use for an old tool: maternity waiting homes to improve equity in rural childbirth care. Results from a cross-sectional hospital and community survey in Tanzania.旧工具的新用途:产妇等候之家改善农村分娩护理公平性。来自坦桑尼亚的一项横断面医院和社区调查结果。
Health Policy Plan. 2017 Dec 1;32(10):1354-1360. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czx100.
5
Determinants for choice of home birth over health facility birth among women of reproductive age in Tanzania: an analysis of data from the 2015-16 Tanzania demographic and health survey and malaria indicator survey.坦桑尼亚育龄妇女选择在家分娩而非在医疗机构分娩的决定因素:对2015 - 16年坦桑尼亚人口与健康调查及疟疾指标调查数据的分析
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Sep 24;20(1):561. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03266-3.
6
Who is left behind on the road to universal facility delivery? A cross-sectional multilevel analysis in rural Tanzania.在普及设施分娩的道路上,谁被落下了?坦桑尼亚农村地区的一项横断面多层次分析。
Trop Med Int Health. 2015 Aug;20(8):1057-66. doi: 10.1111/tmi.12518. Epub 2015 Apr 30.
7
Too poor or too far? Partitioning the variability of hospital-based childbirth by poverty and travel time in Kenya, Malawi, Nigeria and Tanzania.太贫穷还是路途太远?肯尼亚、马拉维、尼日利亚和坦桑尼亚基于贫困和旅行时间的医院分娩差异分析。
Int J Equity Health. 2020 Jan 28;19(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-1123-y.
8
Health system support for childbirth care in Southern Tanzania: results from a health facility census.坦桑尼亚南部卫生系统对分娩护理的支持:医疗机构普查结果
BMC Res Notes. 2013 Oct 30;6:435. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-6-435.
9
Predictors of Health Care Seeking Behavior During Pregnancy, Delivery, and the Postnatal Period in Rural Tanzania.坦桑尼亚农村地区孕期、分娩期及产后医疗保健寻求行为的预测因素
Matern Child Health J. 2016 Aug;20(8):1726-34. doi: 10.1007/s10995-016-1976-2.
10
Inequalities in use of hospitals for childbirth among rural women in sub-Saharan Africa: a comparative analysis of 18 countries using Demographic and Health Survey data.撒哈拉以南非洲农村妇女在分娩时使用医院方面的不平等:利用人口与健康调查数据对 18 个国家的比较分析。
BMJ Glob Health. 2024 Jan 22;9(1):e013029. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013029.

引用本文的文献

1
Mixed vulnerabilities: the biological risk of high parity is aggravated by emergency referral in Benin, Malawi, Tanzania and Uganda.多重脆弱性:在贝宁、马拉维、坦桑尼亚和乌干达,紧急转诊加剧了高生育次数带来的生物学风险。
Int J Equity Health. 2025 Jan 20;24(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02379-5.
2
Inequalities in use of hospitals for childbirth among rural women in sub-Saharan Africa: a comparative analysis of 18 countries using Demographic and Health Survey data.撒哈拉以南非洲农村妇女在分娩时使用医院方面的不平等:利用人口与健康调查数据对 18 个国家的比较分析。
BMJ Glob Health. 2024 Jan 22;9(1):e013029. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013029.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Health system redesign for maternal and newborn survival: rethinking care models to close the global equity gap.为母婴生存而重新设计卫生系统:重新思考护理模式以弥合全球公平差距。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Oct;5(10). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002539.
2
Effective coverage measurement in maternal, newborn, child, and adolescent health and nutrition: progress, future prospects, and implications for quality health systems.有效测量孕产妇、新生儿、儿童和青少年健康与营养状况:进展、未来前景及其对优质卫生系统的影响。
Lancet Glob Health. 2020 May;8(5):e730-e736. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30104-2.
3
Too poor or too far? Partitioning the variability of hospital-based childbirth by poverty and travel time in Kenya, Malawi, Nigeria and Tanzania.
Quality of reporting and trends of emergency obstetric and neonatal care indicators: an analysis from Tanzania district health information system data between 2016 and 2020.
报告质量和紧急产科及新生儿护理指标的趋势:2016 年至 2020 年期间坦桑尼亚地区卫生信息系统数据的分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Oct 7;23(1):716. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-06028-z.
4
No increase in use of hospitals for childbirth in Tanzania over 25 years: Accumulation of inequity among poor, rural, high parity women.坦桑尼亚25年来医院分娩使用率未增:贫困、农村、多胎次妇女之间的不平等加剧。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Aug 15;2(8):e0000345. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000345. eCollection 2022.
5
Determinants of facility-based childbirth among adolescents and young women in Guinea: A secondary analysis of the 2018 Demographic and Health Survey.几内亚青少年和年轻女性基于医疗机构分娩的决定因素:2018年人口与健康调查的二次分析
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Nov 2;2(11):e0000435. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000435. eCollection 2022.
太贫穷还是路途太远?肯尼亚、马拉维、尼日利亚和坦桑尼亚基于贫困和旅行时间的医院分娩差异分析。
Int J Equity Health. 2020 Jan 28;19(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-1123-y.
4
Current realities versus theoretical optima: quantifying efficiency and sociospatial equity of travel time to hospitals in low-income and middle-income countries.当前现实与理论最优情况:量化低收入和中等收入国家前往医院的出行时间的效率和社会空间公平性。
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Aug 21;4(4):e001552. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001552. eCollection 2019.
5
Commentary: Primary health care in Tanzania - Leading the way through innovation.评论:坦桑尼亚的初级卫生保健——通过创新引领前行。
EClinicalMedicine. 2019 Jul 27;13:12-13. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2019.07.010. eCollection 2019 Aug.
6
Time trends in facility-based and private-sector childbirth care: analysis of Demographic and Health Surveys from 25 sub-Saharan African countries from 2000 to 2016.机构和私营部门的儿童分娩护理的时间趋势:2000 年至 2016 年来自 25 个撒哈拉以南非洲国家的人口与健康调查分析。
J Glob Health. 2019 Dec;9(2):020406. doi: 10.7189/jogh.09.020406.
7
Does facility birth reduce maternal and perinatal mortality in Brong Ahafo, Ghana? A secondary analysis using data on 119 244 pregnancies from two cluster-randomised controlled trials.在加纳布隆阿哈福地区,医院分娩是否能降低产妇和围产儿死亡率?两项整群随机对照试验中 119244 例妊娠的二次分析结果
Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Aug;7(8):e1074-e1087. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30165-2.
8
Comparing socioeconomic inequalities between early neonatal mortality and facility delivery: Cross-sectional data from 72 low- and middle-income countries.比较早期新生儿死亡率和医疗机构分娩之间的社会经济不平等:来自 72 个低收入和中等收入国家的横断面数据。
Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 5;9(1):9786. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-45148-5.
9
Redesigning maternal health services: is centralisation the answer in low-resource settings?重新设计孕产妇保健服务:在资源匮乏地区,集中化是解决之道吗?
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 May 22;4(3):e001488. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001488. eCollection 2019.
10
Initiation and continuity of maternal healthcare: examining the role of vouchers and user-fee removal on maternal health service use in Kenya.孕产妇医疗保健的启动和持续:考察代金券和取消自费在肯尼亚孕产妇保健服务利用方面的作用。
Health Policy Plan. 2019 Mar 1;34(2):120-131. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czz004.