• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者参与临床前实验室研究:范围综述。

Patient engagement in preclinical laboratory research: A scoping review.

机构信息

Clinical Epidemiology Program, Blueprint Translational Research Group, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 501 Smyth Road, PO Box 201B, Ottawa, Ontario K1H 8L6, Canada.

Clinical Epidemiology Program, Blueprint Translational Research Group, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 501 Smyth Road, PO Box 201B, Ottawa, Ontario K1H 8L6, Canada; School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Canada.

出版信息

EBioMedicine. 2021 Aug;70:103484. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103484. Epub 2021 Jul 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103484
PMID:34280783
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8318845/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

'Patient engagement' involves meaningful collaboration between researchers and 'patient partners' to co-create research. It helps ensure that research being conducted is relevant to its ultimate end-users. Although patient engagement within clinical research has been well documented, the prevalence and effects of patient engagement in translational preclinical laboratory research remain unclear. The aim of this scoping review is to present current patient engagement activities reported in preclinical laboratory research.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, and grey literature were systematically searched from inception to April 2021. Studies that described or investigated patient engagement in preclinical laboratory research were included. Patient engagement activities where patients (i.e. patients, family members, caregivers or community members) provided input, or consultation on at least one element of the research process were eligible for inclusion. Study characteristics and outcomes were extracted and organized thematically.

FINDINGS

32 reports were included (30 primary studies, 1 narrative review, and 1 researcher guide). Most studies engaged patients at the education or priority setting stages (n=26). The most frequently reported benefit of patient engagement was 'providing a mutual learning opportunity'. Reported barriers to patient engagement reflected concerns around 'differences in knowledge and research experience' and how this may challenge communication and limit meaningful collaboration.

INTERPRETATION

Patient engagement is feasible and beneficial for preclinical laboratory research. Future work should focus on assessing the impacts of patient engagement in this area of research.

FUNDING

None.

摘要

背景

“患者参与”涉及研究人员与“患者伙伴”之间的有意义合作,共同开展研究。它有助于确保正在进行的研究与其最终的终端用户相关。尽管临床研究中的患者参与已经得到了充分的记录,但患者参与转化性临床前实验室研究的普遍性和影响仍不清楚。本综述的目的是介绍目前在临床前实验室研究中报告的患者参与活动。

方法

从创建到 2021 年 4 月,系统地在 MEDLINE、Embase 和灰色文献中进行了搜索。纳入描述或调查临床前实验室研究中患者参与的研究。符合纳入标准的患者参与活动是指患者(即患者、家庭成员、照顾者或社区成员)至少对研究过程的一个要素提供投入或咨询。提取研究特征和结果,并进行主题组织。

结果

共纳入 32 份报告(30 项原始研究、1 项叙述性综述和 1 项研究人员指南)。大多数研究在教育或优先设定阶段让患者参与(n=26)。患者参与的最常报告的益处是“提供共同学习的机会”。报告的患者参与障碍反映了对“知识和研究经验差异”的担忧,以及这如何挑战沟通并限制有意义的合作。

解释

患者参与对于临床前实验室研究是可行且有益的。未来的工作应集中评估患者参与这一研究领域的影响。

资金

无。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ee6/8318845/e341b1780178/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ee6/8318845/e341b1780178/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ee6/8318845/e341b1780178/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Patient engagement in preclinical laboratory research: A scoping review.患者参与临床前实验室研究:范围综述。
EBioMedicine. 2021 Aug;70:103484. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103484. Epub 2021 Jul 17.
2
Patient engagement in a national research network: barriers, facilitators, and impacts.患者参与国家研究网络:障碍、促进因素及影响
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Mar 8;9(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00418-5.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Patient, caregiver and other knowledge user engagement in consensus-building healthcare initiatives: a scoping review protocol.患者、照护者和其他知识使用者参与制定共识的医疗保健举措:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 May 8;14(5):e080822. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080822.
5
Protocol for co-producing a framework and integrated resource platform for engaging patients in laboratory-based research.共同制定让患者参与实验室研究的框架和综合资源平台的方案。
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Feb 12;10(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00545-7.
6
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.暑期项目对处境不利或“有风险”的年轻人的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun.
7
Patient engagement in research related to dementia: A scoping review.患者参与痴呆症相关研究:一项范围综述。
Dementia (London). 2018 Nov;17(8):944-975. doi: 10.1177/1471301218789292.
8
Patient Engagement Partnerships in Clinical Trials: Development of Patient Partner and Investigator Decision Aids.临床试验中的患者参与伙伴关系:患者伙伴和研究者决策辅助工具的开发。
Patient. 2020 Dec;13(6):745-756. doi: 10.1007/s40271-020-00460-5. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
9
Incorporating and evaluating citizen engagement in health research: a scoping review protocol.将公民参与纳入并评估卫生研究:范围综述方案。
Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 28;10(1):260. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01812-4.
10
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

1
How are patient partners involved in health service research? A scoping review of reviews.患者合作伙伴如何参与卫生服务研究?一项综述的范围界定综述。
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Jul 8;11(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00755-7.
2
Podcasts as a platform for sharing and disseminating experiences and expertise between young adults with cancer and radiotherapy researchers.播客作为癌症青年患者与放射治疗研究人员之间分享和传播经验及专业知识的平台。
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Jun 17;11(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00718-y.
3
Patient and public involvement in basic and clinical psychiatric research: a scoping review of reviews.
患者及公众参与基础和临床精神病学研究:综述的范围综述
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Mar 25;25(1):283. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-06608-7.
4
Enhancing patients' role in scientific writing: insights from a global participatory approach with people with multiple sclerosis.增强患者在科学写作中的作用:来自与多发性硬化症患者的全球参与式方法的见解。
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Feb 24;11(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00687-2.
5
How to build a framework to establish a patient research partner network in rheumatology research: a report of a 2-year implementation project.如何构建一个框架以在风湿病研究中建立患者研究伙伴网络:一项为期两年实施项目的报告
RMD Open. 2025 Feb 10;11(1):e005263. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2024-005263.
6
Inclusion in neurological research: empowering people living with neurological diseases.纳入神经学研究:增强神经疾病患者的权能。
Nat Rev Neurol. 2025 Mar;21(3):159-170. doi: 10.1038/s41582-024-01047-6. Epub 2025 Jan 7.
7
Conducting Patient-Oriented Research in Pediatric Populations: A Narrative Review.在儿科人群中开展以患者为导向的研究:一项叙述性综述
Children (Basel). 2024 Oct 19;11(10):1266. doi: 10.3390/children11101266.
8
Evaluation of research co-design in health: a systematic overview of reviews and development of a framework.健康领域研究共同设计的评价:系统综述概述与框架的制定。
Implement Sci. 2024 Sep 11;19(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s13012-024-01394-4.
9
Patient and public involvement in preclinical and medical research: Evaluation of an established programme in a Discovery-Based Medical Research Institute.患者和公众参与临床前和医学研究:在以发现为基础的医学研究所中评估既定计划。
Health Expect. 2024 Feb;27(1):e13968. doi: 10.1111/hex.13968.
10
Perspectives of researchers and clinicians on patient and public involvement (PPI) in preclinical spinal cord research: An interview study.研究者和临床医生对参与临床前脊髓研究的患者和公众的看法(PPI):一项访谈研究。
Health Expect. 2024 Feb;27(1):e13967. doi: 10.1111/hex.13967.