Department of Critical Care Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Ground Floor, McCaig Tower, 3134 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 5A1, Canada.
Department of Community Health Science and O'Brien Institute for Public Health, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 28;10(1):260. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01812-4.
Citizen engagement in research is an emerging practice that involves members of the general public in research processes such as priority setting, planning, decision-making, research conduct, implementation, evaluation, and dissemination. Engaging citizens in research, particularly health research, increases the relevance of study findings, minimizes waste by facilitating stewardship over resources, and builds public trust in the research. While several existing frameworks guide the application of citizen engagement principles to health research, it is unclear how citizen engagement can be utilized to maximize benefits and minimize risks and challenges in health research. To address the gaps in knowledge around citizen engagement in health research, we propose a scoping review to synthesize the state of knowledge on methods to incorporate and evaluate citizen engagement in research. A protocol is presented in this manuscript.
The methodology for our scoping review is guided by Arksey and O' Malley's framework for scoping reviews, and additional recommendations by Levac and colleagues. We will include peer-reviewed and gray literature that report on citizen engagement in health research (including biomedical, clinical, health systems and services, and social, cultural, environmental and population health) and report method(s) to conduct, measure, or evaluate citizen engagement. We will systematically search electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, JSTOR, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Science Direct) from inception onwards and search relevant organizations' websites for additional studies, frameworks, and reports on citizen engagement. Title and abstract and full-text citations will be screened independently and in duplicate. Data will be extracted independently and in duplicate, including document characteristics, citizen engagement definitions and goals, and outcomes of citizen engagement (e.g., barriers, facilitators).
This review will synthesize the definitions, goals, methods, outcomes, and significance of citizen engagement in health research, as well as any potential barriers, facilitators, and challenges outlined in existing literature. The findings will provide an evidence-based foundation for developing new or improved guidance for citizen engagement in health research. Overall, we anticipate that our scoping review will be a preliminary step to meaningful engagement of citizens in research and strengthen the relationship between the scientific community and the public through transparency and collaboration.
Open Science Framework https://osf.io/hzcbr .
公民参与研究是一种新兴的实践,它让普通民众参与到研究过程中,例如优先事项的设定、规划、决策、研究的进行、实施、评估和传播。让公民参与研究,特别是健康研究,可以提高研究结果的相关性,通过资源管理促进节约,以及建立公众对研究的信任。虽然现有的几个框架指导了公民参与健康研究的原则的应用,但公民参与如何能够被用来最大限度地提高健康研究的利益,同时最小化风险和挑战还不清楚。为了解决公民参与健康研究知识方面的差距,我们提出了一个范围综述,以综合关于将公民参与纳入研究并对其进行评估的方法的知识状况。本文介绍了该综述的方案。
我们的范围综述方法是由 Arksey 和 O' Malley 的范围综述框架指导的,并参考了 Levac 等人的额外建议。我们将包括同行评审和灰色文献,这些文献报告了公民参与健康研究(包括生物医学、临床、卫生系统和服务以及社会、文化、环境和人口健康)的情况,并报告了进行、衡量或评估公民参与的方法。我们将系统地从最初开始搜索电子数据库(MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL、JSTOR、PsycINFO、Scopus 和 Science Direct),并搜索相关组织的网站,以获取更多关于公民参与的研究、框架和报告。标题和摘要以及全文引文将由独立的两人小组进行筛选。数据将由独立的两人小组提取,包括文件特征、公民参与的定义和目标,以及公民参与的结果(例如,障碍、促进因素)。
本综述将综合健康研究中公民参与的定义、目标、方法、结果以及现有文献中概述的任何潜在障碍、促进因素和挑战。研究结果将为制定新的或改进的健康研究公民参与指南提供循证基础。总的来说,我们预计我们的范围综述将是公民实质性参与研究的初步步骤,并通过透明度和合作加强科学界和公众之间的关系。
Open Science Framework https://osf.io/hzcbr 。