Morbitzer Kathryn A, McLaughlin Jacqueline E, Ozawa Sachiko, Beechinor Ryan, Dumond Julie, Pomykal Christina, Bush Antonio, Zhang Qisheng, Carpenter Delesha, Lee Craig R
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
Am J Pharm Educ. 2021 Jan;85(1):8079. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8079. Epub 2020 Oct 2.
To design, implement, and assess the initial impact of a pharmacy student research and scholarship training pathway. The Research and Scholarship in Pharmacy (RASP) pathway was designed to create a longitudinal, elective pathway within a Doctor of Pharmacy (PharmD) curriculum at a single institution. The pathway consisted of three elective courses built around a faculty-mentored scholarly project where students framed an answerable question, generated and interpreted relevant data, and communicated their findings in oral and written form. Following implementation, a retrospective, multi-method analysis was conducted to evaluate the impact of the program on the initial two student cohorts that completed it and assess their perceptions of the value of the pathway. Fifty students (25 in each of two cohorts) completed the three-course sequence. Students were supported by 33 distinct faculty mentors. Thirty-eight (76%) students presented an abstract derived from their project at a national meeting. The first cohort exit survey (96% response rate) revealed positive student perceptions regarding the value of and satisfaction with the research pathway. Twenty-three (96%) students were satisfied with their research experience, 21 (88%) were satisfied with their faculty mentor, and 24 (100%) were satisfied with their development of project management skills. In the first cohort, 10 (40%) students published an original research manuscript within one year of graduation. The Research and Scholarship in Pharmacy pathway feasibly and effectively provided a mechanism for students to engage in a faculty-mentored longitudinal research experience within a PharmD curriculum that promoted skill development and opportunities for scholarship. Initial implementation demonstrated high rates of student satisfaction, low rates of student attrition, and high rates of scholarly output.
设计、实施并评估药学专业学生科研与学术培训路径的初步影响。药学研究与学术(RASP)路径旨在在单一机构的药学博士(PharmD)课程中创建一条纵向的选修路径。该路径由围绕教师指导的学术项目构建的三门选修课程组成,学生们在此过程中提出可回答的问题、生成并解读相关数据,并以口头和书面形式交流他们的研究结果。实施后,进行了一项回顾性的多方法分析,以评估该项目对完成该路径的最初两个学生群体的影响,并评估他们对该路径价值的看法。五十名学生(两个群体各25名)完成了这三门课程的学习。学生们得到了33位不同教师导师的支持。三十八名(76%)学生在全国会议上展示了源自其项目的摘要。第一批学生的结业调查(回复率为96%)显示,学生们对研究路径的价值和满意度持积极看法。二十三名(96%)学生对他们的研究经历感到满意,二十一名(88%)对他们的教师导师感到满意,二十四名(100%)对他们项目管理技能的提升感到满意。在第一批学生中,十名(40%)学生在毕业一年内发表了一篇原创研究手稿。药学研究与学术路径切实有效地为学生提供了一种机制,使他们能够在PharmD课程中参与教师指导的纵向研究经历,促进技能发展并获得学术机会。初步实施显示出学生满意度高、学生流失率低和学术产出率高的特点。