University of Utah, College of Pharmacy, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 Sep;84(9):ajpe7940. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7940.
To assess the impact of a Doctor of Pharmacy (PharmD) capstone project on students' ability to conduct research and quality improvement, and to assess the feasibility of requiring projects in the core curriculum. Project proposals were solicited from faculty members and local colleagues, and students matched with an individual project and mentor. After developing a written research proposal in their third professional year, students completed the project with mentor oversight in their third and fourth professional years, culminating with a poster session and completion of a manuscript prior to graduation. Students' knowledge of biostatistics, research confidence, and attitudes regarding research were evaluated using a validated survey instrument. Students and mentors were surveyed for feedback, and students' publications and presentations were tracked. Sixty-one students (97%) completed their projects on time. Students' confidence in their ability to understand and participate in research increased, but improvement in statistical knowledge and interest in conducting future research projects was minimal. Fifty-eight percent of students presented posters at national conferences. Thirteen (21%) published manuscripts in peer-reviewed journals. Students and mentors responded positively overall about the program and the associated time requirements. Requiring PharmD students to complete a capstone project prior to graduation was feasible and increased student confidence in their ability to participate in research and the number of student and faculty poster presentations and peer-reviewed publications. These findings support the consideration of the Academy that analysis, synthesis, and creation of new knowledge can be successfully implemented into the core PharmD curricula.
为了评估药学博士(PharmD)顶点项目对学生进行研究和质量改进的能力的影响,并评估在核心课程中要求项目的可行性。从教师和当地同事那里征集了项目提案,并为学生匹配了个人项目和导师。在第三专业年完成书面研究提案后,学生在第三和第四专业年在导师监督下完成项目,最终在毕业前完成海报展示和完成手稿。使用经过验证的调查工具评估学生的生物统计学知识、研究信心和对研究的态度。征求了学生和导师的反馈意见,并跟踪了学生的出版物和演讲。61 名学生(97%)按时完成了他们的项目。学生对自己理解和参与研究的能力的信心增强,但统计知识的提高和对未来研究项目的兴趣很小。58%的学生在全国会议上展示了海报。13 篇(21%)在同行评议期刊上发表了论文。学生和导师对该项目及其相关时间要求的总体反应积极。要求药学博士学生在毕业前完成顶点项目是可行的,这增加了学生对参与研究的能力的信心,以及学生和教师海报展示和同行评议出版物的数量。这些发现支持学院的考虑,即分析、综合和新知识的创造可以成功地纳入核心药学博士课程。