Suppr超能文献

健康友好型活动指数的编制与验证:一种综合评估企业或组织健康友好型活动的工具。

Development and validation of the Health-Friendly Activity Index: an assessment tool to comprehensively measure health-friendly activities of corporations or organisations.

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea

Department of Family Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Jongno-gu, South Korea.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 19;11(7):e048768. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048768.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We developed the Health-Friendly Activity Index (HFAI) to comprehensively measure the health-friendly activities of corporations or organisations. We validated the developed tool and reported on its use as an assessment tool to improve consumers' health-related outcomes.

DESIGN

This was a cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Development of the HFAI questionnaire followed a three-phase process: item generation, item construction and validation with field testing. Using relevance and feasibility criteria, we developed a 105-item questionnaire with six domains (Governance and Infrastructure, Needs Assessment, Planning, Implementation, Monitoring and Feedback, and Outcomes).

PARTICIPANTS

To assess the sensitivity and validity of the questionnaire, the HFAI and Contribution Assessment Tool for Consumer's Health (CATCH) were administered to 302 participants (151 employers and 151 employees) from 151 Korean companies.

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES

The CATCH measured the contribution of each company to the physical, mental, social and spiritual health of its consumers. To estimate the reliability and validity of all six HFAI domains and their respective scales, Cronbach's α coefficients and correlation coefficients were used.

RESULTS

Each domain and scale of the HFAI exhibited a Cronbach's α coefficient between 0.80 and 0.98 for the employers and employees. The overall HFAI and its six domains correlated significantly and positively with all health outcomes such as physical, mental, social and spiritual status scores evaluated using the CATCH (Spearman's correlation range: 0.37-0.68).

CONCLUSION

The HFAI, a unique assessment tool with acceptable psychometric properties, can help corporate managers assess their health-friendly activities.

摘要

目的

我们开发了健康友好型活动指数(HFAI),以全面衡量企业或组织的健康友好型活动。我们验证了开发的工具,并报告了将其作为评估工具用于改善消费者健康相关结果的情况。

设计

这是一项横断面研究。

设置

HFAI 问卷的开发遵循三个阶段的过程:项目生成、项目构建和现场测试验证。我们使用相关性和可行性标准,开发了一个包含六个领域(治理和基础设施、需求评估、规划、实施、监测和反馈以及结果)的 105 项问卷。

参与者

为了评估问卷的敏感性和有效性,HFAI 和消费者健康评估工具(CATCH)在 151 家韩国公司的 302 名参与者(151 名雇主和 151 名员工)中进行了评估。

主要观察指标

CATCH 衡量了每家公司对其消费者的身体、心理、社会和精神健康的贡献。为了估计所有六个 HFAI 领域及其各自量表的可靠性和有效性,使用了 Cronbach's α 系数和相关系数。

结果

雇主和员工的 HFAI 每个领域和量表的 Cronbach's α 系数在 0.80 到 0.98 之间。HFAI 的整体及其六个领域与使用 CATCH 评估的所有健康结果(如身体、心理、社会和精神状态评分)显著正相关(Spearman 相关范围:0.37-0.68)。

结论

HFAI 是一种具有可接受的心理测量特性的独特评估工具,可帮助企业经理评估其健康友好型活动。

相似文献

3
Crosscultural Adaptation and Validation of the Korean Version of the New Knee Society Knee Scoring System.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Jun;475(6):1629-1639. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5307-8. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
5
Reliability and validity of the adapted Dutch version of the revised Scoliosis Research Society 22-item questionnaire.
Spine J. 2014 Aug 1;14(8):1663-72. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.09.046. Epub 2013 Oct 25.
9
The Spiritual Needs Assessment for Patients (SNAP): development and validation of a comprehensive instrument to assess unmet spiritual needs.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2012 Jul;44(1):44-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.07.008. Epub 2012 Jun 1.
10
Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of caregiver self-assessment questionnaire.
Disabil Rehabil. 2020 Nov;42(22):3250-3255. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1587525. Epub 2019 Apr 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Perception of Advertisements for Healthy Food on Social Media: Effect of Attitude on Consumers' Response.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 4;17(18):6463. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186463.
3
4
What are the key factors influencing consumers' preference and willingness to pay for meat products in Eastern DRC?
Food Sci Nutr. 2018 Oct 4;6(8):2321-2336. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.813. eCollection 2018 Nov.
8
Best practices in evaluating worksite health promotion programs.
Am J Health Promot. 2010 Jan-Feb;24(3):TAHP1-9, iii. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.24.3.tahp.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验