• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Obstetric hemorrhage risk assessment tool predicts composite maternal morbidity.产科出血风险评估工具预测复合产妇发病率。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 19;11(1):14709. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-93413-3.
2
Hemorrhage Risk Assessment on Admission: Utility for Prediction of Maternal Morbidity.入院时的出血风险评估:对预测产妇发病率的效用。
Am J Perinatol. 2021 Sep;38(11):1126-1133. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1710501. Epub 2020 May 23.
3
Maternal and Neonatal Morbidity After Attempted Operative Vaginal Delivery According to Fetal Head Station.根据胎儿头部位置进行阴道助产术后的孕产妇和新生儿发病率
Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Sep;126(3):521-529. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001000.
4
Revisit of risk factors for major obstetric hemorrhage: insights from a large medical center.重大产科出血风险因素的再探讨:来自大型医疗中心的见解
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015 Oct;292(4):819-28. doi: 10.1007/s00404-015-3725-y. Epub 2015 Apr 24.
5
Association of adverse outcomes with three-tiered risk assessment tool for obstetrical hemorrhage.不良结局与产科出血三级风险评估工具的关联
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023 Oct;5(10):101106. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.101106. Epub 2023 Jul 29.
6
Association of Intended Route of Delivery and Maternal Morbidity in Twin Pregnancy.双胎妊娠分娩方式与产妇并发症的相关性研究。
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Feb;129(2):305-310. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001844.
7
Ability of an obstetric hemorrhage risk assessment tool to predict quantitative peripartum blood loss.产科出血风险评估工具预测围产期定量失血的能力。
J Perinat Med. 2024 Aug 2;52(8):837-842. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2024-0187. Print 2024 Oct 28.
8
Comparative Analysis of Obstetric Hemorrhage Risk Prediction Tools.比较分析产科出血风险预测工具。
Am J Perinatol. 2023 Nov;40(15):1687-1694. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1740013. Epub 2021 Dec 16.
9
Antecedents of red cell transfusion in a large contemporary obstetric cohort.一个大型当代产科队列中红细胞输血的前因。
J Perinat Med. 2019 Feb 25;47(2):195-199. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2018-0227.
10
Intrapartum Risk Factors and Prediction of Obstetric Hemorrhage-Related Morbidity.分娩期风险因素与产科出血相关发病率的预测。
Am J Perinatol. 2024 May;41(S 01):e988-e994. doi: 10.1055/a-1975-4688. Epub 2022 Nov 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Hemorrhage risk score and peripartum quantified blood loss.出血风险评分与围产期定量失血
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2024 Nov 5;38(1):7-14. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2024.2419193. eCollection 2025.
2
Association between psychopharmacotherapy and postpartum hemorrhage.心理药物治疗与产后出血之间的关联。
AJOG Glob Rep. 2024 Oct 9;4(4):100402. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2024.100402. eCollection 2024 Nov.
3
Assessment and Prediction of Cardiovascular Contributions to Severe Maternal Morbidity.心血管因素对严重孕产妇发病影响的评估与预测
JACC Adv. 2023 Mar;2(2). doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2023.100275. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
4
Perioperative Considerations in Management of the Severely Bleeding Coagulopathic Patient.严重出血性凝血功能障碍患者的围手术期处理注意事项。
Anesthesiology. 2023 May 1;138(5):535-560. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000004520.
5
Development and Validation of a Predictive Tool for Postpartum Hemorrhage after Vaginal Delivery: A Prospective Cohort Study.阴道分娩后产后出血预测工具的开发与验证:一项前瞻性队列研究
Biology (Basel). 2022 Dec 29;12(1):54. doi: 10.3390/biology12010054.

本文引用的文献

1
Hemorrhage Risk Assessment on Admission: Utility for Prediction of Maternal Morbidity.入院时的出血风险评估:对预测产妇发病率的效用。
Am J Perinatol. 2021 Sep;38(11):1126-1133. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1710501. Epub 2020 May 23.
2
Evaluation of Risk-Assessment Tools for Severe Postpartum Hemorrhage in Women Undergoing Cesarean Delivery.评估行剖宫产术的产妇发生严重产后出血的风险评估工具。
Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Dec;134(6):1308-1316. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003574.
3
Association of Timing of Plasma Transfusion With Adverse Maternal Outcomes in Women With Persistent Postpartum Hemorrhage.血浆输注时机与持续性产后出血妇女不良母婴结局的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Nov 1;2(11):e1915628. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.15628.
4
Comparison of outcome between intrauterine balloon tamponade and uterine artery embolization in the management of persistent postpartum hemorrhage: A propensity score-matched cohort study.宫腔球囊填塞与子宫动脉栓塞治疗产后持续性出血的结局比较:倾向评分匹配队列研究。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019 Nov;98(11):1473-1482. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13679. Epub 2019 Jul 10.
5
Twin pregnancy and risk of postpartum hemorrhage.双胎妊娠与产后出血风险。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 Nov;33(22):3740-3745. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1583736. Epub 2019 Mar 5.
6
Correction: Predicting peripartum blood transfusion in women undergoing cesarean delivery: A risk prediction model.更正:预测剖宫产妇女围产期输血:一种风险预测模型。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 23;14(1):e0211360. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211360. eCollection 2019.
7
A global view of severe maternal morbidity: moving beyond maternal mortality.全球视野下的严重孕产妇发病率:超越孕产妇死亡率。
Reprod Health. 2018 Jun 22;15(Suppl 1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12978-018-0527-2.
8
Structure, Process, and Outcome Data of AWHONN's Postpartum Hemorrhage Quality Improvement Project.美国妇产科护士协会产后出血质量改进项目的结构、过程及结果数据
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2018 Sep;47(5):707-718. doi: 10.1016/j.jogn.2018.05.002. Epub 2018 Jun 23.
9
Placenta percreta is associated with more frequent severe maternal morbidity than placenta accreta.胎盘植入比胎盘粘连更常导致严重的产妇发病率。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Aug;219(2):193.e1-193.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.04.049. Epub 2018 May 5.
10
The effect of tranexamic acid on blood loss and maternal outcome in the treatment of persistent postpartum hemorrhage: A nationwide retrospective cohort study.氨甲环酸治疗持续性产后出血对失血及产妇结局的影响:一项全国性回顾性队列研究
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 6;12(11):e0187555. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187555. eCollection 2017.

产科出血风险评估工具预测复合产妇发病率。

Obstetric hemorrhage risk assessment tool predicts composite maternal morbidity.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Luke's University Health Network, Allentown, PA, USA.

Department of Surgery, George Washington University School of Medicine & Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 19;11(1):14709. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-93413-3.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-021-93413-3
PMID:34282160
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8289851/
Abstract

Obstetric hemorrhage is one of the leading preventable causes of maternal mortality in the United States. Although hemorrhage risk-prediction models exist, there remains a gap in literature describing if these risk-prediction tools can identify composite maternal morbidity. We investigate how well an established obstetric hemorrhage risk-assessment tool predicts composite hemorrhage-associated morbidity. We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of a multicenter database including women admitted to Labor and Delivery from 2016 to 2018, at centers implementing the Association of Women's Health, Obstetric, and Neonatal Nurses risk assessment tool on admission. A composite morbidity score incorporated factors including obstetric hemorrhage (estimated blood loss ≥ 1000 mL), blood transfusion, or ICU admission. Out of 56,903 women, 14,803 (26%) were categorized as low-risk, 26,163 (46%) as medium-risk and 15,937 (28%) as high-risk for obstetric hemorrhage. Composite morbidity occurred at a rate of 2.2%, 8.0% and 11.9% within these groups, respectively. Medium- and high-risk groups had an increased combined risk of composite morbidity (diagnostic OR 4.58; 4.09-5.13) compared to the low-risk group. This established hemorrhage risk-assessment tool predicts clinically-relevant composite morbidity. Future randomized trials in obstetric hemorrhage can incorporate these tools for screening patients at highest risk for composite morbidity.

摘要

产科出血是美国孕产妇死亡的主要可预防原因之一。尽管存在出血风险预测模型,但文献中仍存在空白,描述这些风险预测工具是否可以识别复合产妇发病率。我们研究了一种既定的产科出血风险评估工具在预测复合出血相关发病率方面的表现。我们对 2016 年至 2018 年期间在实施妇女健康、产科和新生儿护士协会风险评估工具的中心接受分娩的多中心数据库进行了回顾性队列分析。复合发病率评分纳入了产科出血(估计失血量≥1000 毫升)、输血或 ICU 入院等因素。在 56903 名女性中,14803 名(26%)被归类为低危,26163 名(46%)为中危,15937 名(28%)为高危。在这些组中,复合发病率的发生率分别为 2.2%、8.0%和 11.9%。中危和高危组的复合发病率综合风险增加(诊断 OR 4.58;4.09-5.13),与低危组相比。这种既定的出血风险评估工具可预测临床相关的复合发病率。未来的产科出血随机试验可以将这些工具纳入用于筛选复合发病率最高的患者。