Tactile Perception and Learning Lab, International School for Advanced Studies (SISSA), Trieste, Italy.
Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United States.
Elife. 2021 Jul 20;10:e66429. doi: 10.7554/eLife.66429.
Recent studies examine the behavioral capacities of rats and mice with and without visual input, and the neuronal mechanisms underlying such capacities. These animals are assumed to be functionally blind under red light, an assumption that might originate in the fact that they are dichromats who possess ultraviolet and green cones, but not red cones. But the inability to see red as a color does not necessarily rule out form vision based on red light absorption. We measured Long-Evans rats' capacity for visual form discrimination under red light of various wavelength bands. Upon viewing a black and white grating, they had to distinguish between two categories of orientation: horizontal and vertical. Psychometric curves plotting judged orientation versus angle demonstrate the conserved visual capacity of rats under red light. Investigations aiming to explore rodent physiological and behavioral functions in the absence of visual input should not assume red-light blindness.
最近的研究检查了有和没有视觉输入的大鼠和小鼠的行为能力,以及这种能力的神经机制。这些动物在红光下被假定为功能性失明,这种假设可能源于这样一个事实,即它们是二色视者,拥有紫外线和绿色视锥细胞,但没有红色视锥细胞。但是,不能将红色视为颜色并不一定排除基于红光吸收的形状视觉。我们测量了长耳大鼠在各种波长的红光下的视觉形状辨别能力。当它们看到黑白光栅时,它们必须在两个方向类别之间进行区分:水平和垂直。绘制判断方向与角度的心理曲线表明,大鼠在红光下具有保守的视觉能力。旨在探索缺乏视觉输入的啮齿动物生理和行为功能的研究不应假设红光失明。