Harvard Medical School.
Brigham and Women's Hospital.
Workplace Health Saf. 2021 Nov;69(11):525-539. doi: 10.1177/21650799211020961. Epub 2021 Jul 20.
Shift work is associated with long-term health risks. Workplace-based health interventions hold promise for improving or maintaining the health of shift workers; yet, the impact of workplace-based interventions on shift worker sleep duration has not been assessed. We conducted a systematic review of workplace interventions on shift worker sleep.
We conducted searches in PubMed, Web of Knowledge, EMBASE, Scopus, and PsycINFO ( = 6,868 records) of all studies published through May 15, 2019. Eligibility criteria included the following: (a) individuals aged ≥18 years; (b) a workplace-based employee intervention; (c) an employee population comprised predominantly of shift workers (>50%); and (d) sleep duration as a study outcome.
Twenty workplace interventions met eligibility criteria. Mean intervention duration was 125 ( = 187) days and mean sample size was 116 employees ( = 256) with a mean age of 36.4 years ( = 6.5). Interventions most commonly focused on light exposure (25%) or shift timing (25%), followed by sleep hygiene (20%). Most interventions were conducted in the health care and social assistance sector (60%). Study quality on average was 64% ( = 7%). A majority of the studies found that a workplace-based health intervention was associated with a desirable increase in 24-hour total sleep duration (55%). The overall average increase in daily employee sleep duration achieved by interventions ranged for RCT studies from 0.34 to 0.99 hours and for non-RCT studies from 0.02 to 1.15 hours.
CONCLUSIONS/APPLICATIONS TO PRACTICE: More than half of the employee health interventions, especially yoga or mindfulness interventions, resulted in a desirable increase in sleep duration. Workplaces hold promise as an avenue? for delivering programs and policies that aim to improve sleep duration among shift workers.
轮班工作与长期健康风险相关。基于工作场所的健康干预措施有望改善或维持轮班工人的健康;然而,基于工作场所的干预措施对轮班工人睡眠时长的影响尚未得到评估。我们对轮班工人睡眠的基于工作场所的干预措施进行了系统评价。
我们在 2019 年 5 月 15 日之前对 PubMed、Web of Knowledge、EMBASE、Scopus 和 PsycINFO 中的所有研究进行了检索(共检索到 6868 条记录)。纳入标准包括:(a)年龄≥18 岁的个体;(b)基于工作场所的员工干预;(c)员工人群主要由轮班工人组成(>50%);(d)睡眠时长为研究结果。
有 20 项基于工作场所的干预措施符合纳入标准。平均干预时间为 125(=187)天,平均样本量为 116 名员工(=256),平均年龄为 36.4 岁(=6.5)。干预措施最常关注光照(25%)或轮班时间(25%),其次是睡眠卫生(20%)。大多数干预措施都在医疗保健和社会援助部门进行(60%)。研究质量平均为 64%(=7%)。大多数研究发现,基于工作场所的健康干预与 24 小时总睡眠时间的理想增加有关(55%)。干预措施使员工每日睡眠时间平均增加幅度,对于 RCT 研究为 0.34 至 0.99 小时,对于非 RCT 研究为 0.02 至 1.15 小时。
结论/对实践的应用:超过一半的员工健康干预措施,尤其是瑜伽或正念干预措施,导致睡眠时间的理想增加。工作场所作为一个途径,有希望实施旨在改善轮班工人睡眠时长的方案和政策。