Suppr超能文献

比较使用 15°C、25°C 和 35°C 的膀胱内生理盐水测量危重症患者腹腔内压力的效果。

Comparison of Intra-Abdominal Pressure Measurements in Critically Ill Patients Using Intravesical Normal Saline at 15°C, 25°C, and 35°C.

机构信息

Department of Critical Care Medicine, Sixth Medical Center of People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China (mainland).

Yeehong Business School, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Beijing, China (mainland).

出版信息

Med Sci Monit. 2021 Jul 21;27:e932804. doi: 10.12659/MSM.932804.

Abstract

BACKGROUND The incidence of intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) and abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) in intensive care units is high. Dynamic monitoring of intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) is important to treat patients with these conditions. The World Society of Abdominal Compartment Syndrome revised IAP measurement and treatment guidelines in 2013. IAP is measured by instilling ≤25 mL of sterile saline into the bladder, but there is no requirement for the saline to be at a specific temperature. Many doctors presume that using cold saline will trigger bladder muscle spasms, resulting in measurement error. In the present study, we investigated the effect of body-temperature saline on IAP measurements. MATERIAL AND METHODS A single-center study was conducted in 12 patients with IAH over a 2-year period. IAP was measured via the bladder with instillation of sterile saline at temperatures of 35°C, 25°C, and 15°C. We analyzed the data using R software, version 4.1.0. Paired t tests were used for comparisons between groups. A Spearman rank correlation analysis was performed to compare groups. Analysis results were plotted using the R packages ggplot2, ggpubr, and BlandAltmanLeh. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS There was a significant difference in IAP measurement between the 15°C and 35°C groups (t=-2.55, P=0.027). There was no significant difference between the 25°C and 35°C groups (t=0.73, P=0.48). Bland-Altman analysis showed that IAP was consistent in the 25°C and 35°C groups. CONCLUSIONS Although it is preferable to measure IAP with saline at body temperature (35°C), a temperature >25°C is associated with accurate results. Using saline at <15°C should be avoided.

摘要

背景

在重症监护病房中,腹腔内高压(IAH)和腹腔间隔室综合征(ACS)的发病率很高。动态监测腹腔内压(IAP)对于治疗这些疾病的患者非常重要。世界腹科腔隔综合征学会在 2013 年修订了 IAP 测量和治疗指南。IAP 通过向膀胱中注入≤25 毫升的无菌生理盐水来测量,但对生理盐水的温度没有要求。许多医生认为使用冷生理盐水会引发膀胱肌肉痉挛,导致测量误差。在本研究中,我们研究了体温生理盐水对 IAP 测量的影响。

材料与方法

在 2 年的时间里,我们对 12 名 IAH 患者进行了单中心研究。通过向膀胱中注入无菌生理盐水来测量 IAP,生理盐水的温度分别为 35°C、25°C 和 15°C。我们使用 R 软件(版本 4.1.0)分析数据。使用配对 t 检验比较组间差异。采用 Spearman 秩相关分析比较组间关系。使用 R 包 ggplot2、ggpubr 和 BlandAltmanLeh 对分析结果进行绘图。P<0.05 为统计学显著差异。

结果

15°C 组和 35°C 组之间的 IAP 测量值存在显著差异(t=-2.55,P=0.027)。25°C 组和 35°C 组之间的差异无统计学意义(t=0.73,P=0.48)。Bland-Altman 分析表明,25°C 和 35°C 两组的 IAP 结果一致。

结论

尽管使用体温(35°C)生理盐水测量 IAP 更为理想,但温度>25°C 也可获得准确的结果。应避免使用<15°C 的生理盐水。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ba3/8312347/4ef949603cf6/medscimonit-27-e932804-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验