• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

原发性乳腺导管癌和肺腺癌患者的生存分析:来自 SEER 的一项基于人群的研究。

Survival analysis of patients with primary breast duct carcinoma and lung adenocarcinoma: a population-based study from SEER.

机构信息

Center of Stomatology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.

Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 20;11(1):14790. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-94357-4.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-021-94357-4
PMID:34285322
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8292419/
Abstract

The appeal to enroll patients with primary breast and lung cancer in clinical trials is increasing, but survival of these two primary cancers remains to be elucidated. This study analyzed the prognosis of primary breast duct carcinoma with subsequent lung adenocarcinoma (BCLA) and primary breast duct carcinoma with prior lung adenocarcinoma (LABC). Cohorts of 3,515 patients with BCLA and 654 patients with LABC were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Patients were classified into simultaneous two primary cancer (sTPC), metachronous two primary cancer (mTPC1), or mTPC2 groups when the interval times between breast and lung cancer were within 6 months, between 7 and 60 months, or over 60 months, respectively. The propensity score matching program (PSM) was applied to determine the survival of BCLA/LABC relative to single breast/lung cancer. Cox proportional hazard regression model and competing risk modes were performed to identify confounders associated with all-cause and cancer-specific death, respectively. Survival of patients with LABC/BCLA relative to single breast/lung cancer was accessed via median survival time. The survival of patients with BCLA/LABC was generally poor compared with the survival of those with single breast cancer. The PSM-estimated HR in the sTPC group with BCLA and in the mTPC1 and mTPC2 groups with LABC were 0.75 (95% CI 0.62-0.90), 0.52 (95% CI 0.27-0.98), and 0.36 (95% CI 0.20-0.65), respectively, whereas the SHRs were 0.80 (95% CI 0.66-0.97), 0.68 (95% CI 0.34-1.34), and 0.46 (95% CI 0.27-0.80), respectively, compared with those in the single lung cancer group. By contrast, the survival rates of the remaining patients did not differ. The median survival times since secondary malignancy were 42, 23, and 20 months in the sTPC, mTPC1, and mTPC2 groups with BCLA, respectively, and 18, 60, and 180 months in those with LABC, respectively. For patients with BCLA, the adjusted Cox regression suggested incidences of all-cause deaths in mTPC1group were statically higher than those in sTPC group, whereas the incidences of all-cause and cancer-specific death in the mTPC1 and mTPC2 groups were statistically lower than those in the sTPC group. The prognosis of patients with breast cancer and subsequent lung cancer of over 18 months was not significantly different than that of single lung cancer, which supported the profound appeal to increase the involvement of these two primary cancers in potential beneficial clinical trials. For patients with lung cancer and prior breast cancer of within 6 months and subsequent breast cancer of over 18 months, prognosis was improved relative to single lung cancer. Therefore, additional attention is needed to eliminate the potential bias may when these patients are recruited in the clinical trials.

摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6f2/8292419/81196aad758e/41598_2021_94357_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6f2/8292419/0ebb4de9aad5/41598_2021_94357_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6f2/8292419/b4346d2e18b7/41598_2021_94357_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6f2/8292419/e5106b21e8f2/41598_2021_94357_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6f2/8292419/74950bae2855/41598_2021_94357_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6f2/8292419/81196aad758e/41598_2021_94357_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6f2/8292419/0ebb4de9aad5/41598_2021_94357_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6f2/8292419/b4346d2e18b7/41598_2021_94357_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6f2/8292419/e5106b21e8f2/41598_2021_94357_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6f2/8292419/74950bae2855/41598_2021_94357_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6f2/8292419/81196aad758e/41598_2021_94357_Fig5_HTML.jpg

越来越多的原发性乳腺癌和肺癌患者被招募到临床试验中,但这两种原发性癌症的存活率仍有待阐明。本研究分析了随后发生肺腺癌(BCLA)的原发性乳腺癌和先前发生肺腺癌(LABC)的原发性乳腺癌的预后。从监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库中确定了 3515 例 BCLA 和 654 例 LABC 患者的队列。当乳腺癌和肺癌之间的间隔时间在 6 个月内、7 至 60 个月内和 60 个月以上时,患者分别被归类为同时性双原发性癌(sTPC)、异时性双原发性癌(mTPC1)或 mTPC2 组。应用倾向评分匹配程序(PSM)确定 BCLA/LABC 相对于单发性乳腺癌/肺癌的生存率。Cox 比例风险回归模型和竞争风险模型分别用于确定与全因和癌症特异性死亡相关的混杂因素。通过中位生存时间评估 LABC/BCLA 患者相对于单发性乳腺癌/肺癌的生存情况。与单发性乳腺癌相比,BCLA/LABC 患者的总体生存情况较差。BCLA 中 sTPC 组和 LABC 中 mTPC1 和 mTPC2 组的 PSM 估计 HR 分别为 0.75(95%CI 0.62-0.90)、0.52(95%CI 0.27-0.98)和 0.36(95%CI 0.20-0.65),而 LABC 中 SHR 分别为 0.80(95%CI 0.66-0.97)、0.68(95%CI 0.34-1.34)和 0.46(95%CI 0.27-0.80),与单发性肺癌组相比。相比之下,其余患者的生存率没有差异。BCLA 中 sTPC、mTPC1 和 mTPC2 组继发性恶性肿瘤后的中位生存时间分别为 42、23 和 20 个月,LABC 组分别为 18、60 和 180 个月。对于 BCLA 患者,调整后的 Cox 回归表明,mTPC1 组的全因死亡率发生率高于 sTPC 组,而 mTPC1 和 mTPC2 组的全因和癌症特异性死亡率发生率均低于 sTPC 组。乳腺癌和随后的肺癌超过 18 个月的患者的预后与单发性肺癌无显著差异,这支持了强烈呼吁将这两种原发性癌症纳入潜在有益的临床试验。对于肺癌和 6 个月内的既往乳腺癌以及随后的 18 个月以上的乳腺癌患者,预后相对单发性肺癌有所改善。因此,在招募这些患者参加临床试验时,需要额外关注以消除潜在的偏倚。

相似文献

1
Survival analysis of patients with primary breast duct carcinoma and lung adenocarcinoma: a population-based study from SEER.原发性乳腺导管癌和肺腺癌患者的生存分析:来自 SEER 的一项基于人群的研究。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 20;11(1):14790. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-94357-4.
2
Prognosis of male lung cancer patients with urinary cancer: a study from a national population-based analysis.男性肺癌患者合并膀胱癌的预后:一项全国性基于人群的分析研究。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 6;13(1):283. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-27566-8.
3
Effects of Marital Status on Prognosis in Women with Infiltrating Ductal Carcinoma of the Breast: A Real-World 1: 1 Propensity-Matched Study.婚姻状况对浸润性乳腺癌女性预后的影响:一项真实世界的 1:1 倾向匹配研究。
Med Sci Monit. 2020 Jun 25;26:e923630. doi: 10.12659/MSM.923630.
4
Population-Based Analysis of Breast Cancer Incidence and Survival Outcomes in Women Diagnosed with Lobular Carcinoma In Situ.基于人群的乳腺癌发病率和生存结局分析:诊断为乳腺小叶原位癌的女性。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Sep;24(9):2509-2517. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-5867-6. Epub 2017 Apr 28.
5
Enhanced Survival with Lymphadenectomy in Early-Stage Metachronous Second Primary Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis.淋巴结清扫术提高早期异时性第二原发性肺癌患者的生存率:一项回顾性分析。
Oncol Res Treat. 2024;47(5):198-205. doi: 10.1159/000538259. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
6
Increased risk of breast cancer-specific mortality among cancer survivors who developed breast cancer as a second malignancy.在因第二种恶性肿瘤而患有乳腺癌的癌症幸存者中,乳腺癌特异性死亡风险增加。
BMC Cancer. 2021 May 3;21(1):491. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08132-9.
7
Prior cancer does not adversely affect survival in locally advanced lung cancer: A national SEER-medicare analysis.既往癌症对局部晚期肺癌患者的生存率无不利影响:一项基于美国国家癌症数据库(SEER)和医疗保险数据的分析
Lung Cancer. 2016 Aug;98:106-113. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2016.05.029. Epub 2016 May 31.
8
Clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcomes in breast carcinosarcoma: A SEER population-based study.乳腺癌肉瘤的临床病理特征和生存结局:一项基于 SEER 人群的研究。
Breast. 2020 Feb;49:157-164. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2019.11.008. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
9
Risk and survival of chronic myeloid leukemia after breast cancer: A population-based study.乳腺癌后慢性髓系白血病的风险和生存:一项基于人群的研究。
Curr Probl Cancer. 2019 Jun;43(3):213-221. doi: 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2018.08.005. Epub 2018 Sep 3.
10
Marital status independently predicts non-small cell lung cancer survival: a propensity-adjusted SEER database analysis.婚姻状况独立预测非小细胞肺癌的生存:倾向调整后的 SEER 数据库分析。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2020 Jan;146(1):67-74. doi: 10.1007/s00432-019-03084-x. Epub 2019 Nov 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Prognosis of male lung cancer patients with urinary cancer: a study from a national population-based analysis.男性肺癌患者合并膀胱癌的预后:一项全国性基于人群的分析研究。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 6;13(1):283. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-27566-8.
2
[Risk Factors and Pathogenic Mechanism for Secondary Primary Lung Cancer 
in Breast Cancer Patients: A Review].[乳腺癌患者继发原发性肺癌的危险因素及发病机制:综述]
Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi. 2022 Oct 20;25(10):750-755. doi: 10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2022.101.46. Epub 2022 Sep 28.

本文引用的文献

1
A pan-cancer proteomic perspective on The Cancer Genome Atlas.基于癌症基因组图谱的泛癌蛋白质组学视角。
Nat Commun. 2014 May 29;5:3887. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4887.
2
Multiple neoplasms, single primaries, and patient survival.多种肿瘤,单一原发灶,与患者生存
Cancer Manag Res. 2014 Mar 5;6:119-34. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S57378. eCollection 2014.
3
[The significance of the child].[儿童的重要性]
Prof Inferm. 1983 Jan-Mar;36(1):38-43.
4
[Precautions in the use of trichlormetaphos-3].[三氯甲磷-3使用中的注意事项]
Veterinariia. 1967 Jun;44(6):95-7.
5
Studies on the nature and managment of psoriasis.银屑病的本质与治疗研究
Calif Med. 1971 Jun;114(6):1-10.
6
[The role of the temporal lobe cortico-limbic structures in regulating respiration in man].[颞叶皮质-边缘系统结构在调节人类呼吸中的作用]
Fiziol Zh SSSR Im I M Sechenova. 1969 Apr;55(4):480-5.
7
[Tuberculous rheumatism. (Apropos of 2 cases)].[结核性风湿症。(关于2例)]
Rhumatologie. 1966 Apr;18(4):139-42.
8
[Limits of the schizophrenia concept and limits of the significance of psychiatric diagnosis].[精神分裂症概念的局限性与精神科诊断意义的局限性]
Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1971 Oct 16;101(41):1457-64.
9
Resting and postexercise apexcardiogram correlated with maximal tredmill stress test in normal subjects.正常受试者静息和运动后心尖搏动图与最大跑步机压力测试相关。
Circulation. 1971 Sep;44(3):397-402. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.44.3.397.
10
AAHA '72.美国心脏协会,1972年
Mod Vet Pract. 1972 Jun;53(6):21-4.