Center of Stomatology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 20;11(1):14790. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-94357-4.
The appeal to enroll patients with primary breast and lung cancer in clinical trials is increasing, but survival of these two primary cancers remains to be elucidated. This study analyzed the prognosis of primary breast duct carcinoma with subsequent lung adenocarcinoma (BCLA) and primary breast duct carcinoma with prior lung adenocarcinoma (LABC). Cohorts of 3,515 patients with BCLA and 654 patients with LABC were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Patients were classified into simultaneous two primary cancer (sTPC), metachronous two primary cancer (mTPC1), or mTPC2 groups when the interval times between breast and lung cancer were within 6 months, between 7 and 60 months, or over 60 months, respectively. The propensity score matching program (PSM) was applied to determine the survival of BCLA/LABC relative to single breast/lung cancer. Cox proportional hazard regression model and competing risk modes were performed to identify confounders associated with all-cause and cancer-specific death, respectively. Survival of patients with LABC/BCLA relative to single breast/lung cancer was accessed via median survival time. The survival of patients with BCLA/LABC was generally poor compared with the survival of those with single breast cancer. The PSM-estimated HR in the sTPC group with BCLA and in the mTPC1 and mTPC2 groups with LABC were 0.75 (95% CI 0.62-0.90), 0.52 (95% CI 0.27-0.98), and 0.36 (95% CI 0.20-0.65), respectively, whereas the SHRs were 0.80 (95% CI 0.66-0.97), 0.68 (95% CI 0.34-1.34), and 0.46 (95% CI 0.27-0.80), respectively, compared with those in the single lung cancer group. By contrast, the survival rates of the remaining patients did not differ. The median survival times since secondary malignancy were 42, 23, and 20 months in the sTPC, mTPC1, and mTPC2 groups with BCLA, respectively, and 18, 60, and 180 months in those with LABC, respectively. For patients with BCLA, the adjusted Cox regression suggested incidences of all-cause deaths in mTPC1group were statically higher than those in sTPC group, whereas the incidences of all-cause and cancer-specific death in the mTPC1 and mTPC2 groups were statistically lower than those in the sTPC group. The prognosis of patients with breast cancer and subsequent lung cancer of over 18 months was not significantly different than that of single lung cancer, which supported the profound appeal to increase the involvement of these two primary cancers in potential beneficial clinical trials. For patients with lung cancer and prior breast cancer of within 6 months and subsequent breast cancer of over 18 months, prognosis was improved relative to single lung cancer. Therefore, additional attention is needed to eliminate the potential bias may when these patients are recruited in the clinical trials.
越来越多的原发性乳腺癌和肺癌患者被招募到临床试验中,但这两种原发性癌症的存活率仍有待阐明。本研究分析了随后发生肺腺癌(BCLA)的原发性乳腺癌和先前发生肺腺癌(LABC)的原发性乳腺癌的预后。从监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库中确定了 3515 例 BCLA 和 654 例 LABC 患者的队列。当乳腺癌和肺癌之间的间隔时间在 6 个月内、7 至 60 个月内和 60 个月以上时,患者分别被归类为同时性双原发性癌(sTPC)、异时性双原发性癌(mTPC1)或 mTPC2 组。应用倾向评分匹配程序(PSM)确定 BCLA/LABC 相对于单发性乳腺癌/肺癌的生存率。Cox 比例风险回归模型和竞争风险模型分别用于确定与全因和癌症特异性死亡相关的混杂因素。通过中位生存时间评估 LABC/BCLA 患者相对于单发性乳腺癌/肺癌的生存情况。与单发性乳腺癌相比,BCLA/LABC 患者的总体生存情况较差。BCLA 中 sTPC 组和 LABC 中 mTPC1 和 mTPC2 组的 PSM 估计 HR 分别为 0.75(95%CI 0.62-0.90)、0.52(95%CI 0.27-0.98)和 0.36(95%CI 0.20-0.65),而 LABC 中 SHR 分别为 0.80(95%CI 0.66-0.97)、0.68(95%CI 0.34-1.34)和 0.46(95%CI 0.27-0.80),与单发性肺癌组相比。相比之下,其余患者的生存率没有差异。BCLA 中 sTPC、mTPC1 和 mTPC2 组继发性恶性肿瘤后的中位生存时间分别为 42、23 和 20 个月,LABC 组分别为 18、60 和 180 个月。对于 BCLA 患者,调整后的 Cox 回归表明,mTPC1 组的全因死亡率发生率高于 sTPC 组,而 mTPC1 和 mTPC2 组的全因和癌症特异性死亡率发生率均低于 sTPC 组。乳腺癌和随后的肺癌超过 18 个月的患者的预后与单发性肺癌无显著差异,这支持了强烈呼吁将这两种原发性癌症纳入潜在有益的临床试验。对于肺癌和 6 个月内的既往乳腺癌以及随后的 18 个月以上的乳腺癌患者,预后相对单发性肺癌有所改善。因此,在招募这些患者参加临床试验时,需要额外关注以消除潜在的偏倚。