Huang Wentao, Aune Dagfinn, Ferrari Gerson, Zhang Lei, Lan Yutao, Nie Jing, Chen Xiong, Xu Dali, Wang Yafeng, Rezende Leandro F M
School of Nursing, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Jul 13;13:555-565. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S308220. eCollection 2021.
To examine the association of psychological distress with all-cause, cardiovascular disease (CVD) and cancer mortality in US adults, and verified whether the associations differed between participants with and without diabetes.
A total of 485,864 adults (446,288 without diabetes and 39,576 with diabetes) who participated in the National Health Interview Survey from 1997 to 2013 were linked to the National Death Index through December 31, 2015. Psychological distress was measured by the Kessler 6 distress scale (K6). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were performed to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for the association between psychological distress and mortality.
We ascertained 11,746 deaths (mean follow-up, 7. 7 years) among people with diabetes and 51,636 deaths (9.9 years) among those without diabetes. Psychological distress was associated with higher all-cause, CVD, and cancer mortality. Compared to non-diabetic adults without psychological distress, HRs (95% CI) were 1.07 (1.04 to 1.09) for mild, 1.26 (1.22 to 1.30) for moderate and 1.46 (1.38 to 1.55) for severe psychological distress. Compared to the same reference group, in diabetic participants the HRs were 1.39 (1.33 to 1.44) for no psychological distress, 1.59 (1.53 to 1.66) for mild, 1.90 (1.80 to 2.00) for moderate and 1.98 (1.82 to 2.17) for severe psychological distress. Similar associations were also observed for CVD and cancer mortality but with non-statistically significant interaction.
Psychological distress was associated with higher mortality, particularly in participants with diabetes. Strategies to ameliorate psychological distress may be important to reduce mortality in this population.
研究美国成年人心理困扰与全因死亡率、心血管疾病(CVD)死亡率和癌症死亡率之间的关联,并验证这些关联在有糖尿病和无糖尿病参与者之间是否存在差异。
1997年至2013年参加美国国家健康访谈调查的485864名成年人(446288名无糖尿病者和39576名有糖尿病者)与截至2015年12月31日的国家死亡指数进行了关联。心理困扰通过凯斯勒6项心理困扰量表(K6)进行测量。采用多变量Cox比例风险回归模型来估计心理困扰与死亡率之间关联的风险比(HR)和95%置信区间(95%CI)。
我们确定糖尿病患者中有11746人死亡(平均随访7.7年),无糖尿病患者中有51636人死亡(9.9年)。心理困扰与较高的全因死亡率、CVD死亡率和癌症死亡率相关。与无心理困扰的非糖尿病成年人相比,轻度心理困扰的HR(95%CI)为1.07(1.04至1.09),中度为1.26(1.22至1.30),重度为1.46(1.38至1.55)。与相同的参照组相比,在糖尿病参与者中,无心理困扰的HR为1.39(1.33至1.44),轻度为1.59(1.53至1.66),中度为1.90(1.80至2.00),重度为1.98(1.82至2.17)。在CVD死亡率和癌症死亡率方面也观察到类似的关联,但交互作用无统计学意义。
心理困扰与较高的死亡率相关,尤其是在糖尿病患者中。改善心理困扰的策略对于降低该人群的死亡率可能很重要。