Suppr超能文献

医学图书馆员在系统评价中定位临床试验的知识和实践。

Medical librarians' knowledge and practices in locating clinical trials for systematic reviews.

出版信息

J Med Libr Assoc. 2021 Apr 1;109(2):295-300. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2021.1144.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

In regard to locating clinical trials for a systematic review, limited information is available about how librarians locate clinical trials in biomedical databases, including (1) how much information researchers provide librarians to assist with the development of a comprehensive search strategy, (2) which tools librarians turn to for information about study design methodology, and (3) librarians' confidence levels in their knowledge of study design methodology. A survey was developed to explore these aspects of how a medical librarian locates clinical trials when facilitating systematic reviews for researchers.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, a 21-question survey was sent to medical librarians via several email listservs during April 2020. Respondents were limited to librarians who make the decisions on search terms for systematic reviews.

RESULTS

Responses (n=120) indicated that librarians were often asked to search for various types of clinical trials. However, there was not a consistent method for creating search strategies that locate diverse types of clinical trials. Multiple methods were used for search strategy development, with hedges being the most popular method. In general, these librarians considered themselves to be confident in locating trials. Different resources were used to inform study types, including textbooks, articles, library guides and websites.

DISCUSSION

Medical librarians indicated that while they felt confident in their searching skills, they did not have a definitive source of information about the various types of clinical trials, and their responses demonstrated a clear need and desire for more information on study design methodology.

摘要

目的

在针对系统评价寻找临床试验时,关于图书馆员如何在生物医学数据库中查找临床试验的信息有限,包括(1)研究人员提供给图书馆员多少信息以协助制定全面的搜索策略,(2)图书馆员求助于哪些工具来获取有关研究设计方法学的信息,以及(3)图书馆员对其研究设计方法学知识的信心水平。这项调查旨在探索医学图书馆员在为研究人员促进系统评价时寻找临床试验的方法。

方法

在这项横断面研究中,于 2020 年 4 月通过多个电子邮件列表向医学图书馆员发送了一份包含 21 个问题的调查。受访者仅限于负责为系统评价制定搜索词的图书馆员。

结果

回应(n=120)表明,图书馆员经常被要求搜索各种类型的临床试验。然而,制定定位各种类型临床试验的搜索策略的方法并不一致。多种方法用于搜索策略的制定,其中 hedges 是最常用的方法。总的来说,这些图书馆员认为自己在定位试验方面有信心。不同的资源被用于告知研究类型,包括教科书、文章、图书馆指南和网站。

讨论

医学图书馆员表示,虽然他们对自己的搜索技能有信心,但他们没有关于各种类型临床试验的明确信息来源,他们的回应清楚地表明他们对研究设计方法学有更多信息的需求和渴望。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2779/8270353/55b63ffbb50c/jmla-109-2-295-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验