• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

设计图书馆员系统评价能力课程建设框架:案例报告。

Designing a framework for curriculum building in systematic review competencies for librarians: a case report.

出版信息

J Med Libr Assoc. 2024 Oct 1;112(4):357-363. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2024.1930. Epub 2024 Oct 7.

DOI:10.5195/jmla.2024.1930
PMID:39429500
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11486078/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Librarians play an important role on systematic review teams because of their expertise in information organization, database searching, and records management. Many systematic review training opportunities exist, but not all are tailored to the needs of librarians. The Medical Library Association, along with a workgroup of experts on systematic reviews and review services, developed a Systematic Review Services Specialization (SRSS) that was launched in 2022. One of the required courses in the specialization was developed by the authors, who set out to build a value-added curriculum that would provide essential searching skills for librarians working in evidence synthesis domains.

CASE PRESENTATION

The authors present a case report on creating a framework for developing a new course in the Medical Library Association's Systematic Review Services Specialization. The objectives of the course were intended to align with six systematic review competencies for librarians developed and published by a group of health science librarians from the University of Michigan in 2017, which include 1) conducting a reference interview, 2) performing preliminary searches, 3) selecting appropriate resources to search, 4) building an extensive, comprehensive, and documented search strategy, 5) peer reviewing search strategies, and 6) reporting search methods. With these objectives in mind, the instructors created four separate modules and an activity.

CONCLUSION

Systematic review skills for librarians are essential to many health science library jobs since librarians are considered important collaborators within systematic review teams. Through eleven cohorts of the course held over 2022-2024, the authors constructed and delivered a comprehensive curriculum.

摘要

背景

由于图书馆员在信息组织、数据库搜索和记录管理方面的专业知识,他们在系统评价团队中发挥着重要作用。有许多系统评价培训机会,但并非所有机会都针对图书馆员的需求量身定制。医学图书馆协会与系统评价和审查服务专家工作组一起,开发了系统评价服务专业(SRSS),该专业于 2022 年推出。该专业的必修课程之一由作者开发,他们旨在构建一个增值课程,为在证据综合领域工作的图书馆员提供必要的搜索技能。

案例介绍

作者介绍了在医学图书馆协会系统评价服务专业中创建一门新课程的案例报告。该课程的目标旨在与密歇根大学一群健康科学图书馆员于 2017 年开发和发布的针对图书馆员的六项系统评价能力保持一致,其中包括 1)进行参考咨询,2)进行初步搜索,3)选择适当的资源进行搜索,4)构建广泛、全面和有文件记录的搜索策略,5)同行评审搜索策略,以及 6)报告搜索方法。考虑到这些目标,讲师创建了四个单独的模块和一个活动。

结论

由于图书馆员被认为是系统评价团队中的重要合作者,因此他们的系统评价技能对于许多健康科学图书馆工作至关重要。通过 2022-2024 年的十一个课程,作者构建并提供了一个全面的课程。

相似文献

1
Designing a framework for curriculum building in systematic review competencies for librarians: a case report.设计图书馆员系统评价能力课程建设框架:案例报告。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2024 Oct 1;112(4):357-363. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2024.1930. Epub 2024 Oct 7.
2
Understanding the foundation: the state of generalist search education in library schools as related to the needs of expert searchers in medical libraries.了解基础:图书馆学院通才搜索教育的现状与医学图书馆专家搜索者需求的相关性。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2005 Jan;93(1):61-8.
3
Roles for librarians in systematic reviews: a scoping review.图书馆员在系统评价中的作用:一项范围综述
J Med Libr Assoc. 2018 Jan;106(1):46-56. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2018.82. Epub 2018 Jan 2.
4
Extending medical librarians' competencies to enhance collection organisation.拓展医学图书馆员的能力以加强馆藏组织。
Health Info Libr J. 2020 Mar;37(1):70-77. doi: 10.1111/hir.12280. Epub 2019 Oct 8.
5
Health Libraries and Information Services in Tanzania: A Strategic Assessment.坦桑尼亚的卫生图书馆和信息服务:战略评估。
Ann Glob Health. 2016 Sep-Oct;82(5):912-921.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.aogh.2016.10.003.
6
Healthcare librarians and learner support: a review of competences and methods.医疗保健图书馆员与学习者支持:能力与方法综述
Health Info Libr J. 2005 Dec;22 Suppl 2:42-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1470-3327.2005.00612.x.
7
Continuing education for systematic reviews: a prospective longitudinal assessment of a workshop for librarians.系统评价继续教育:对图书馆员研讨会的前瞻性纵向评估。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2020 Jan;108(1):36-46. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2020.492. Epub 2020 Jan 1.
8
Humor in library instruction: a narrative review with implications for the health sciences.图书馆教学中的幽默:叙事评论及其对健康科学的影响。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2019 Jul;107(3):304-313. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2019.608. Epub 2019 Jul 1.
9
Medical Information Literacy Q-Bank: A Collaborative and Developing Project.医学信息素养题库:一个合作与发展的项目。
Med Ref Serv Q. 2018 Oct-Dec;37(4):331-340. doi: 10.1080/02763869.2018.1514897.
10
Emerging roles of health information professionals for library and information science curriculum development: a scoping review.健康信息专业人员在图书馆与信息科学课程开发中的新角色:一项范围综述
J Med Libr Assoc. 2018 Oct;106(4):432-444. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2018.354. Epub 2018 Oct 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Searching for studies: A guide to information retrieval for Campbell systematic reviews.搜索研究:坎贝尔系统评价的信息检索指南
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Sep 10;20(3):e1433. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1433. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Librarian involvement in systematic reviews was associated with higher quality of reported search methods: a cross-sectional survey.图书馆员参与系统评价与所报告的检索方法的更高质量相关:一项横断面调查。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2024 Feb;166:111237. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.111237. Epub 2023 Dec 8.
3
The effect of librarian involvement on the quality of systematic reviews in dental medicine.图书管理员参与对牙医学系统评价质量的影响。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 1;16(9):e0256833. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256833. eCollection 2021.
4
PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA statement for reporting literature searches in systematic reviews.PRISMA-S:用于在系统评价中报告文献检索的 PRISMA 声明扩展。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2021 Apr 1;109(2):174-200. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2021.962.
5
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
6
Roles for librarians in systematic reviews: a scoping review.图书馆员在系统评价中的作用:一项范围综述
J Med Libr Assoc. 2018 Jan;106(1):46-56. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2018.82. Epub 2018 Jan 2.
7
A competency framework for librarians involved in systematic reviews.参与系统评价的图书馆员的能力框架。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2017 Jul;105(3):268-275. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2017.189. Epub 2017 Jul 1.
8
Impact of librarians on reporting of the literature searching component of pediatric systematic reviews.图书馆员对儿科系统评价文献检索部分报告的影响。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2016 Oct;104(4):267-277. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.104.4.004.
9
PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement.电子检索策略的PRESS同行评审:2015年指南声明。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jul;75:40-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.01.021. Epub 2016 Mar 19.
10
Use of recommended search strategies in systematic reviews and the impact of librarian involvement: a cross-sectional survey of recent authors.系统评价中推荐检索策略的使用及图书馆员参与的影响:对近期作者的横断面调查
PLoS One. 2015 May 4;10(5):e0125931. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125931. eCollection 2015.