Department of Microbiology and Immunology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell Universitygrid.5386.8, Ithaca, New York, USA.
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
J Virol. 2021 Sep 27;95(20):e0066621. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00666-21. Epub 2021 Jul 21.
Cedar virus (CedV) is a nonpathogenic member of the (HNV) genus of emerging viruses, which includes the deadly Nipah (NiV) and Hendra (HeV) viruses. CedV forms syncytia, a hallmark of henipaviral and paramyxoviral infections and pathogenicity. However, the intrinsic fusogenic capacity of CedV relative to NiV or HeV remains unquantified. HNV entry is mediated by concerted interactions between the attachment (G) and fusion (F) glycoproteins. Upon receptor binding by the HNV G head domain, a fusion-activating G stalk region is exposed and triggers F to undergo a conformational cascade that leads to viral entry or cell-cell fusion. Here, we demonstrate quantitatively that CedV is inherently significantly less fusogenic than NiV at equivalent G and F cell surface expression levels. We then generated and tested six headless CedV G mutants of distinct C-terminal stalk lengths, surprisingly revealing highly hyperfusogenic cell-cell fusion phenotypes 3- to 4-fold greater than wild-type CedV levels. Additionally, similarly to NiV, a headless HeV G mutant yielded a less pronounced hyperfusogenic phenotype compared to wild-type HeV. Further, coimmunoprecipitation and cell-cell fusion assays revealed heterotypic NiV/CedV functional G/F bidentate interactions, as well as evidence of HNV G head domain involvement beyond receptor binding or G stalk exposure. All evidence points to the G head/stalk junction being key to modulating HNV fusogenicity, supporting the notion that head domains play several distinct and central roles in modulating stalk domain fusion promotion. Further, this study exemplifies how CedV may help elucidate important mechanistic underpinnings of HNV entry and pathogenicity. The genus in the family includes the zoonotic Nipah (NiV) and Hendra (HeV) viruses. NiV and HeV infections often cause fatal encephalitis and pneumonia, but no vaccines or therapeutics are currently approved for human use. Upon viral entry, infections yield the formation of multinucleated cells (syncytia). Viral entry and cell-cell fusion are mediated by the attachment (G) and fusion (F) glycoproteins. Cedar virus (CedV), a nonpathogenic henipavirus, may be a useful tool to gain knowledge on henipaviral pathogenicity. Here, using homotypic and heterotypic full-length and headless CedV, NiV, and HeV G/F combinations, we discovered that CedV G/F are significantly less fusogenic than NiV or HeV G/F, and that the G head/stalk junction is key to modulating cell-cell fusion, refining the mechanism of henipaviral membrane fusion events. Our study exemplifies how CedV may be a useful tool to elucidate broader mechanistic understanding for the important henipaviruses.
雪松病毒(CedV)是非致病性亨尼帕病毒属(HNV)新兴病毒的成员,包括致命的尼帕(NiV)和亨德拉(HeV)病毒。CedV 形成合胞体,这是亨尼帕病毒和副粘病毒感染和致病性的标志。然而,CedV 相对于 NiV 或 HeV 的固有融合能力尚未量化。HNV 的进入是由附着(G)和融合(F)糖蛋白的协同相互作用介导的。HNV G 头部结构域与受体结合后,暴露融合激活的 G 柄区,触发 F 发生构象级联反应,导致病毒进入或细胞-细胞融合。在这里,我们定量证明,在等效的 G 和 F 细胞表面表达水平下,CedV 的融合性明显低于 NiV。然后,我们生成并测试了六个具有不同 C 端柄长度的无头 CedV G 突变体,令人惊讶的是,它们表现出的细胞-细胞融合表型比野生型 CedV 高出 3-4 倍。此外,与 NiV 类似,无头 HeV G 突变体与野生型 HeV 相比表现出不太明显的超融合表型。此外,免疫共沉淀和细胞-细胞融合实验表明,NiV/CedV 功能性 G/F 双齿相互作用,以及 HNV G 头部结构域参与受体结合或 G 柄暴露之外的证据。所有证据都表明 G 头部/柄交界处是调节 HNV 融合性的关键,支持这样的观点,即头部结构域在调节柄域融合促进中发挥几个不同且中心的作用。此外,这项研究说明了 CedV 如何帮助阐明亨尼帕病毒进入和致病性的重要机制基础。 该科中的属包括人畜共患的尼帕(NiV)和亨德拉(HeV)病毒。NiV 和 HeV 感染常导致致命性脑炎和肺炎,但目前尚无批准用于人类的疫苗或治疗方法。病毒进入后,会产生多核细胞(合胞体)。病毒进入和细胞-细胞融合由附着(G)和融合(F)糖蛋白介导。雪松病毒(CedV)是非致病性亨尼帕病毒,可能是了解亨尼帕病毒致病性的有用工具。在这里,我们使用同型和异型全长和无头 CedV、NiV 和 HeV G/F 组合,发现 CedV G/F 的融合性明显低于 NiV 或 HeV G/F,并且 G 头部/柄交界处是调节细胞-细胞融合的关键,细化了亨尼帕病毒膜融合事件的机制。我们的研究说明了 CedV 如何成为阐明重要亨尼帕病毒的更广泛机制理解的有用工具。