• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

扩散加权成像鉴别胰腺导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤良恶性的诊断性能:一项系统评价和Meta分析

Diagnostic Performance of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for Differentiating Malignant From Benign Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms of the Pancreas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Xu Fan, Liang Yingying, Guo Wei, Liang Zhiping, Li Liqi, Xiong Yuchao, Ye Guoxi, Zeng Xuwen

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital, Medical College, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.

Department of Radiology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2021 Jul 5;11:637681. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.637681. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fonc.2021.637681
PMID:34290974
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8287206/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess the diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in predicting the malignant potential in patients with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) of the pancreas.

METHODS

A systematic search of articles investigating the diagnostic performance of DWI for prediction of malignant potential in IPMNs was conducted from PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science from January 1997 to 10 February 2020. QUADAS-2 tool was used to evaluate the study quality. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), positive likelihood ratios (PLR), negative likelihood ratios (NLR), and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. The summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve was then plotted, and meta-regression was also performed to explore the heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Five articles with 307 patients were included. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of DWI were 0.74 (95% CI: 0.65, 0.82) and 0.94 (95% CI: 0.78, 0.99), in evaluating the malignant potential of IPMNs. The PLR was 13.5 (95% CI: 3.1, 58.7), the NLR was 0.27 (95% CI: 0.20, 0.37), and DOR was 50.0 (95% CI: 11.0, 224.0). The area under the curve (AUC) of SROC curve was 0.84 (95% CI: 0.80, 0.87). The meta-regression showed that the slice thickness of DWI (p = 0.02) and DWI parameter (p= 0.01) were significant factors affecting the heterogeneity.

CONCLUSIONS

DWI is an effective modality for the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant IPMNs. The slice thickness of DWI and DWI parameter were the main factors influencing diagnostic specificity.

摘要

目的

评估弥散加权成像(DWI)在预测胰腺导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤(IPMN)患者恶性潜能方面的诊断准确性。

方法

于1997年1月至2020年2月10日,在PubMed、Embase和Web of Science上系统检索研究DWI对IPMN恶性潜能预测诊断性能的文章。使用QUADAS - 2工具评估研究质量。计算合并敏感度、特异度、诊断比值比(DOR)、阳性似然比(PLR)、阴性似然比(NLR)及其95%置信区间(CI)。随后绘制总结性受试者工作特征(SROC)曲线,并进行Meta回归以探索异质性。

结果

纳入5篇文章共307例患者。在评估IPMN的恶性潜能时,DWI的合并敏感度和特异度分别为0.74(95%CI:0.65,0.82)和0.94(95%CI:0.78,0.99)。PLR为13.5(95%CI:3.1,58.7),NLR为0.27(95%CI:0.20,0.37),DOR为50.0(95%CI:11.0,224.0)。SROC曲线下面积(AUC)为(95%CI:0.80,0.87)。Meta回归显示,DWI的层厚(p = 0.02)和DWI参数(p = 0.01)是影响异质性的显著因素。

结论

DWI是鉴别良性和恶性IPMN的有效方法。DWI的层厚和DWI参数是影响诊断特异性的主要因素。

相似文献

1
Diagnostic Performance of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for Differentiating Malignant From Benign Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms of the Pancreas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.扩散加权成像鉴别胰腺导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤良恶性的诊断性能:一项系统评价和Meta分析
Front Oncol. 2021 Jul 5;11:637681. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.637681. eCollection 2021.
2
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the accuracy of diffusion-weighted MRI in the detection of malignant pulmonary nodules and masses.扩散加权 MRI 检测恶性肺结节和肿块的准确性的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Acad Radiol. 2014 Jan;21(1):21-9. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2013.09.019.
3
Value of diffusion-weighted MRI for differentiating malignant from benign intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas.扩散加权磁共振成像在鉴别胰腺导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤良恶性中的价值。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Nov;203(5):992-1000. doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.11980.
4
Added value of diffusion-weighted imaging to MR cholangiopancreatography with unenhanced mr imaging for predicting malignancy or invasiveness of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas.弥散加权成像对磁共振胰胆管成像联合平扫磁共振成像在预测胰腺导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤的恶性程度或侵袭性方面的价值。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013 Sep;38(3):555-63. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24022. Epub 2013 Feb 6.
5
Diagnostic performance of DWI for differentiating primary central nervous system lymphoma from glioblastoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.DWI 对原发性中枢神经系统淋巴瘤与胶质母细胞瘤鉴别诊断的性能:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Neurol Sci. 2019 May;40(5):947-956. doi: 10.1007/s10072-019-03732-7. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
6
Diagnostic accuracy of DWI in patients with ovarian cancer: A meta-analysis.弥散加权成像在卵巢癌患者中的诊断准确性:一项荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 May;96(19):e6659. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006659.
7
The assessment of pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients with DCE-MRI and DWI: a systematic review and meta-analysis.基于 DCE-MRI 和 DWI 评估肌层浸润性膀胱癌患者新辅助化疗的病理反应:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Br J Radiol. 2023 Oct;96(1150):20230239. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20230239. Epub 2023 Sep 3.
8
Differentiation among Glioblastomas, Primary Cerebral Lymphomas, and Solitary Brain Metastases Using Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Diffusion Tensor Imaging: A PRISMA-Compliant Meta-analysis.基于弥散加权成像和弥散张量成像的脑胶质瘤、原发性脑淋巴瘤和单发脑转移瘤的鉴别诊断:一项符合 PRISMA 声明的荟萃分析。
ACS Chem Neurosci. 2020 Feb 5;11(3):477-483. doi: 10.1021/acschemneuro.9b00698. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
9
Diagnostic Accuracy of the Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Method Used in Association With the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient for Differentiating Between Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma and High-Grade Glioma: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.联合表观扩散系数使用扩散加权成像方法鉴别原发性中枢神经系统淋巴瘤和高级别胶质瘤的诊断准确性:系统评价与Meta分析
Front Neurol. 2022 Jun 24;13:882334. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.882334. eCollection 2022.
10
Serum carcinoembryonic antigen and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 for prediction of malignancy and invasiveness in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas: A meta-analysis.血清癌胚抗原和糖类抗原19-9用于预测胰腺导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤的恶性和侵袭性:一项荟萃分析。
Biomed Rep. 2015 Jan;3(1):43-50. doi: 10.3892/br.2014.376. Epub 2014 Nov 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic value of quantitative DWI and IVIM parameters in differentiating intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.定量扩散加权成像(DWI)和体素内不相干运动(IVIM)参数在鉴别肝内胆管癌和肝细胞癌中的诊断价值:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025 Aug 22. doi: 10.1007/s00261-025-05072-x.
2
Imaging of the Liver and Pancreas: The Added Value of MRI.肝脏和胰腺的影像学检查:磁共振成像的附加价值
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Mar 26;14(7):693. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14070693.
3
Towards a Simplified and Cost-Effective Diagnostic Algorithm for the Surveillance of Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms (IPMNs): Can We Save Contrast for Later?

本文引用的文献

1
The diagnostic role of CT, MRI/MRCP, PET/CT, EUS and DWI in the differentiation of benign and malignant IPMN: A meta-analysis.CT、MRI/MRCP、PET/CT、EUS 和 DWI 在鉴别良恶性胰胆管内乳头状黏液瘤中的诊断作用:一项荟萃分析。
Clin Imaging. 2021 Apr;72:183-193. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.11.018. Epub 2020 Dec 2.
2
Apparent Diffusion Coefficient for Distinguishing Between Malignant and Benign Lesions in the Head and Neck Region: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.表观扩散系数用于鉴别头颈部恶性与良性病变:一项系统评价和Meta分析
Front Oncol. 2020 Jan 8;9:1362. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01362. eCollection 2019.
3
迈向一种简化且具成本效益的导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤(IPMNs)监测诊断算法:我们能否将造影剂留待后续使用?
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Feb 23;16(5):905. doi: 10.3390/cancers16050905.
4
Computed high-b-value high-resolution DWI improves solid lesion detection in IPMN of the pancreas.计算高 b 值高分辨率 DWI 可提高胰腺 IPMN 中实性病变的检出率。
Eur Radiol. 2023 Oct;33(10):6892-6901. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09661-6. Epub 2023 May 3.
Diffusion-weighted image improves detectability of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma concomitant with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm.
扩散加权成像可提高磁共振胰胆管造影对伴发导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤的胰腺导管腺癌的检测能力。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Nov;98(47):e18039. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018039.
4
Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging and 18-Fluorodeoxglucose Positron Emission Tomography With Computed Tomography for Evaluating Malignancy of Branch Duct and Mixed Type Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms of the Pancreas.磁共振扩散加权成像与18氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描联合计算机断层扫描用于评估胰腺分支导管型和混合型导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤的恶性程度
Pancreas. 2019 May/Jun;48(5):e43-e45. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000001316.
5
Added value of apparent diffusion coefficient in distinguishing between serous and mucin-producing pancreatic cystic neoplasms.在鉴别浆液性和黏液性胰腺囊性肿瘤中的表观扩散系数的附加值。
Eur Radiol. 2019 Sep;29(9):4660-4669. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-6010-9. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
6
Meta-analysis of diffusion-weighted imaging in the differential diagnosis of renal lesions.扩散加权成像在肾脏病变鉴别诊断中的荟萃分析。
Clin Imaging. 2018 Nov-Dec;52:264-272. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2018.08.010. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
7
Skewness of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) histogram helps predict the invasive potential of intraductal papillary neoplasms of the bile ducts (IPNBs).表观扩散系数(ADC)直方图的偏度有助于预测胆管内乳头状肿瘤(IPNBs)的侵袭潜能。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019 Jan;44(1):95-103. doi: 10.1007/s00261-018-1716-8.
8
Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging techniques for parotid tumors, a systematic review and meta-analysis.磁共振成像技术对腮腺肿瘤的诊断准确性:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Clin Imaging. 2018 Nov-Dec;52:36-43. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2018.05.026. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
9
Diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted imaging for differentiating benign and malignant gallbladder lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.扩散加权成像鉴别良恶性胆囊病变的诊断性能:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018 Nov;48(5):1375-1388. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26035. Epub 2018 Apr 20.
10
ADC as a useful diagnostic tool for differentiating benign and malignant vertebral bone marrow lesions and compression fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.ADC 作为一种有用的诊断工具,可用于区分良性和恶性椎体骨髓病变和压缩性骨折:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Radiol. 2018 Jul;28(7):2890-2902. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5330-5. Epub 2018 Feb 15.