• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

威胁和应对评估在 COVID-19 大流行期间采用预防行为的保护动机中的作用。

Role of Threat and Coping Appraisal in Protection Motivation for Adoption of Preventive Behavior During COVID-19 Pandemic.

机构信息

Department of Community Medicine, College of Medicine and Sagore Dutta Hospital, Kolkata, India.

COVID Patient Admission Cell, Swasthya Bhawan, Kolkata, India.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2021 Jul 5;9:678566. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.678566. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2021.678566
PMID:34291027
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8287502/
Abstract

With more than 100 million cases and over 2 million deaths globally, the COVID-19 pandemic continues to remain a major threat. Identifying the behavioral factors influencing preventive behaviors for COVID-19 are crucial in devising public health policies to promote essential strategies to combat the pandemic in an efficient manner. The current study was therefore conducted to estimate the prevalence of COVID-19 preventive behaviors and measure their association with behavioral constructs like threat perception, response efficacy, and self-efficacy, as per socio-demographic background. A region-stratified online survey focusing on the constructs of protection motivation theory, for example, threat and coping appraisal for preventive health practices against COVID-19, was carried out among adult users of social media in India. Generalized linear models with cluster-adjusted-robust standard errors were used to analyze the responses and model the preventive practices among the study population. Analysis of a total 2,646 responses revealed that proper perceptions regarding cause, symptoms, and transmission of COVID-19 were prevalent in the majority of the respondents. The majority of the participants reported frequent use of face masks (93.20%), followed by frequent washing of hands with soap and water (84.90%). The majority of the respondents affirmed that, though not frequently but sometimes, they avoid touching the face with unclean hands. Frequently covering mouth with the crook of the elbow while sneezing and coughing, and maintaining physical distance when outside was noted among 74.14 and 83.84%, respectively. The proportion of participants frequently using sanitizers to clean hands and those infrequently practicing the same were comparable. Self-efficacy for preventive practices and threat-appraisal of COVID-19 illness were identified as important determinants of the selected COVID-19 preventive behaviors, independently. The analysis confirmed that practices of the behaviors were mostly synergistic to each other. Current findings highlight that formulation of precise risk communication strategies to improve perceptions regarding threat appraisal and self-efficacy could facilitate desirable practices, which are also effective in the prevention of airborne infections and, hence, may contribute toward broader policy directions. The evidence urges the implementation of precision-driven risk communication and diffusion of these practices to attain behavioral herd immunity.

摘要

全球有超过 1 亿例病例和超过 200 万人死亡,COVID-19 大流行仍然是一个主要威胁。确定影响 COVID-19 预防行为的行为因素对于制定公共卫生政策以有效促进对抗大流行的基本策略至关重要。因此,本研究旨在估计 COVID-19 预防行为的流行率,并根据社会人口背景衡量其与行为结构的关联,例如威胁感知、应对效能和自我效能。一项针对印度社交媒体成年用户的区域分层在线调查,重点关注保护动机理论的结构,例如针对 COVID-19 的预防保健实践的威胁和应对评估。使用广义线性模型和聚类调整稳健标准误差来分析反应并对研究人群中的预防实践进行建模。对总共 2646 份回应的分析表明,大多数受访者对 COVID-19 的原因、症状和传播有正确的认识。大多数参与者报告经常使用口罩(93.20%),其次是经常用肥皂和水洗手(84.90%)。大多数受访者肯定,虽然不是经常,但有时他们会避免用不干净的手触摸脸部。打喷嚏和咳嗽时经常用肘部弯曲处捂住嘴,外出时保持身体距离,分别为 74.14%和 83.84%。经常使用消毒剂清洁双手的参与者比例与不经常使用消毒剂的参与者比例相当。预防实践的自我效能和 COVID-19 疾病的威胁评估被确定为选定 COVID-19 预防行为的重要决定因素,彼此独立。分析证实,这些行为的实践大多是协同作用的。目前的研究结果表明,制定精确的风险沟通策略以提高对威胁评估和自我效能的认识,可以促进理想的实践,这些实践在预防空气传播感染方面也很有效,因此可能有助于更广泛的政策方向。这一证据促使实施精准驱动的风险沟通和这些实践的传播,以实现行为群体免疫。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4679/8287502/e33606b19b0e/fpubh-09-678566-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4679/8287502/af87a85e5bff/fpubh-09-678566-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4679/8287502/e33606b19b0e/fpubh-09-678566-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4679/8287502/af87a85e5bff/fpubh-09-678566-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4679/8287502/e33606b19b0e/fpubh-09-678566-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Role of Threat and Coping Appraisal in Protection Motivation for Adoption of Preventive Behavior During COVID-19 Pandemic.威胁和应对评估在 COVID-19 大流行期间采用预防行为的保护动机中的作用。
Front Public Health. 2021 Jul 5;9:678566. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.678566. eCollection 2021.
2
Modeling prevention behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic using Bayesian belief networks and protection motivation theory.使用贝叶斯信念网络和保护动机理论对 COVID-19 大流行期间的预防行为进行建模。
Risk Anal. 2024 Sep;44(9):2198-2223. doi: 10.1111/risa.14287. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
3
Preventive Behaviors Towards Covid-19 Pandemic Among Healthcare Providers in Saudi Arabia Using the Protection Motivation Theory.运用保护动机理论探讨沙特阿拉伯医疗保健人员针对新冠疫情的预防行为
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021 Feb 17;14:685-694. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S289837. eCollection 2021.
4
Impact of Online Information on Self-Isolation Intention During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-Sectional Study.新冠疫情期间在线信息对自我隔离意愿的影响:横断面研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 6;22(5):e19128. doi: 10.2196/19128.
5
Threat, Coping, and Social Distance Adherence During COVID-19: Cross-Continental Comparison Using an Online Cross-Sectional Survey.新冠疫情期间的威胁、应对措施及社交距离遵守情况:基于在线横断面调查的跨大陆比较
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 18;22(11):e23019. doi: 10.2196/23019.
6
Differences in the Protection Motivation Theory Constructs between People with Various Latent Classes of Motivation for Vaccination and Preventive Behaviors against COVID-19 in Taiwan.台湾不同疫苗接种和 COVID-19 预防行为潜在动机类别人群的保护动机理论结构差异。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 1;18(13):7042. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18137042.
7
A short, animated video to improve good COVID-19 hygiene practices: a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.一个用于改善良好 COVID-19 卫生习惯的简短动画视频:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Jun 3;21(1):469. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04449-1.
8
Protection Motivation During COVID-19: A Cross-Sectional Study of Family Health, Media, and Economic Influences.新冠疫情期间的保护动机:家庭健康、媒体和经济影响的横断面研究。
Health Educ Behav. 2021 Aug;48(4):434-445. doi: 10.1177/10901981211000318. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
9
Predictors of COVID-19 Preventive Perceptions and Behaviors Among Millennials: Two Cross-sectional Survey Studies.千禧一代对 COVID-19 的预防认知和行为的预测因素:两项横断面调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Aug 12;23(8):e30612. doi: 10.2196/30612.
10
Community knowledge, attitude and practices to SARS-CoV-2 disease 2019 (COVID-19): A cross-sectional study in Woldia town, Northeast Ethiopia.社区对2019年严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2型疾病(COVID-19)的认知、态度和行为:埃塞俄比亚东北部沃尔迪亚镇的一项横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 20;16(4):e0250465. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250465. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Family protection motivation and economic vulnerability: a network analysis of public influenza risk perception, education and mitigation strategies in China.家庭保护动机与经济脆弱性:中国公众流感风险认知、教育及缓解策略的网络分析
Front Public Health. 2025 Aug 8;13:1633541. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1633541. eCollection 2025.
2
COVID-19-Related Experiences and the Psychological Wellbeing of Adolescent Girls in Uganda: A Cross-sectional Study.乌干达少女与新冠疫情相关的经历及心理健康:一项横断面研究
Glob Soc Welf. 2024 Dec;11(4):371-379. doi: 10.1007/s40609-024-00350-w. Epub 2024 Aug 31.
3
Exploring the determinants of online health service usage intentions under the threat of air pollution.

本文引用的文献

1
The COVID-19 Misinfodemic: Moving Beyond Fact-Checking.新冠疫情错误信息泛滥:超越事实核查。
Health Educ Behav. 2021 Feb;48(1):9-13. doi: 10.1177/1090198120980675. Epub 2020 Dec 16.
2
Some at Risk for COVID-19 Are Reluctant to Take Precautions, but Others Are Not: A Case From Rural in Southern Iran.一些有感染 COVID-19 风险的人不愿意采取预防措施,但其他人则并非如此:伊朗南部农村地区的一个案例。
Front Public Health. 2020 Nov 16;8:562300. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.562300. eCollection 2020.
3
The relationship between government trust and preventive behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic in China: Exploring the roles of knowledge and negative emotion.
探究空气污染威胁下在线健康服务使用意愿的决定因素。
Front Public Health. 2024 Oct 2;12:1447733. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1447733. eCollection 2024.
4
Effects of health-related dispositions on citizens' appraisals toward the COVID-19 pandemic and protective behavior.健康相关倾向对公民对 COVID-19 大流行的评估和保护行为的影响。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 5;19(9):e0305995. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305995. eCollection 2024.
5
Longitudinal relationship between pre-exposure prophylaxis motivation and change in adherence among men who have sex with men in Western China.中国西部男男性行为者中,暴露前预防用药动机与坚持服药行为变化的纵向关系。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Sep 2;24(1):1271. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18729-x.
6
Psychological and psychosocial determinants of COVID-related handwashing behaviours: A systematic review.新冠疫情相关洗手行为的心理和社会心理决定因素:一项系统综述
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jul 15;20(3):e1421. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1421. eCollection 2024 Sep.
7
Home-Isolation Care in Newly COVID-19-Positive Elderly Patients: A Caregiver-Centric Explanatory Framework.新冠阳性老年患者的居家隔离护理:以照顾者为中心的解释框架。
Int J Public Health. 2023 Jul 19;68:1606060. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2023.1606060. eCollection 2023.
8
Anxiety, Stress Perception, and Coping Strategies among Students with COVID-19 Exposure.接触过新冠病毒的学生的焦虑、压力认知及应对策略
J Clin Med. 2023 Jun 30;12(13):4404. doi: 10.3390/jcm12134404.
9
Cognitive and Emotional Motivation to Explain Infection-Prevention Behaviors with Social Support as a Mediator During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study in Korea.以社会支持为中介解释新冠疫情期间感染预防行为的认知和情感动机:韩国一项全国性横断面研究
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2023 Apr 18;17:1063-1073. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S404310. eCollection 2023.
10
Effects of Cognitive Appraisals on Perceived Self-Efficacy and Distress during the COVID-19 Lockdown: An Empirical Analysis Based on Structural Equation Modeling.认知评价对 COVID-19 封锁期间感知自我效能和困扰的影响:基于结构方程模型的实证分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 28;20(7):5294. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20075294.
中国 COVID-19 大流行期间政府信任与预防行为之间的关系:探讨知识和负性情绪的作用。
Prev Med. 2020 Dec;141:106288. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106288. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
4
Fear control and danger control amid COVID-19 dental crisis: Application of the Extended Parallel Process Model.COVID-19 牙科危机中的恐惧控制和危险控制:扩展平行过程模型的应用。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 13;15(8):e0237490. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237490. eCollection 2020.
5
COVID-19 Pandemic among Latinx Farmworker and Nonfarmworker Families in North Carolina: Knowledge, Risk Perceptions, and Preventive Behaviors.北卡罗来纳州拉丁裔农场工人和非农场工人家庭中的 COVID-19 大流行:知识、风险认知和预防行为。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 10;17(16):5786. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17165786.
6
Using an integrated social cognition model to predict COVID-19 preventive behaviours.利用综合社会认知模型预测 COVID-19 预防行为。
Br J Health Psychol. 2020 Nov;25(4):981-1005. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12465. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
7
Withdrawn: How perceived threat of Covid-19 causes turnover intention among Pakistani nurses: A moderation and mediation analysis.撤回:Covid-19 的感知威胁如何导致巴基斯坦护士的离职意愿:调节和中介分析。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2021 Feb;30(1):350. doi: 10.1111/inm.12775. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
8
Factors affecting perceived effectiveness of COVID-19 prevention measures among Filipinos during Enhanced Community Quarantine in Luzon, Philippines: Integrating Protection Motivation Theory and extended Theory of Planned Behavior.菲律宾吕宋岛强化社区隔离期间菲律宾人对 COVID-19 预防措施感知有效性的影响因素:整合保护动机理论和扩展计划行为理论。
Int J Infect Dis. 2020 Oct;99:312-323. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.07.074. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
9
Motivations for Social Distancing and App Use as Complementary Measures to Combat the COVID-19 Pandemic: Quantitative Survey Study.将社交距离和应用程序使用作为对抗新冠疫情补充措施的动机:定量调查研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 27;22(8):e21613. doi: 10.2196/21613.
10
Chinese Public's Engagement in Preventive and Intervening Health Behaviors During the Early Breakout of COVID-19: Cross-Sectional Study.新冠疫情早期中国公众对预防性和干预性健康行为的参与情况:横断面研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 21;22(8):e19995. doi: 10.2196/19995.