Suppr超能文献

认知刺激对痴呆症的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Effectiveness of cognitive stimulation for dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield.

Department of Psychology, Centre for Dementia Studies.

出版信息

Psychol Bull. 2021 May;147(5):455-476. doi: 10.1037/bul0000325. Epub 2021 May 24.

Abstract

Cognitive stimulation (CS) is a nonpharmacological intervention often involving group activities and social interaction used to treat cognitive declines in people with dementia. This preregistered systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effectiveness of CS in producing benefits on cognition (primary outcome) and quality of life, activities of daily living, and psychological symptoms (secondary outcomes) across 44 randomized-controlled trials comprising 45 comparisons including 2,444 participants. A medium-sized effect (g = .49) on global cognition was found immediately after the intervention and was supported by decisive Bayesian evidence. Clinical relevance is defined as a reduction of 3 to 4 points on the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale Cognitive subscale; the average attenuation of cognitive decline observed was 2.41 points (after removing 1 outlier). Therefore, the observed decline was of borderline clinical relevance. CS was also found to significantly improve memory, activities of daily living, depressive symptoms, and dementia ratings; most of these effects were supported by substantial and strong Bayesian evidence. No significant effects were found for global cognition at 1 to 10 months follow-up assessment for language, quality of life, anxiety, and behavior symptoms. However, evidence for the absence of these effects was ambiguous. A review of study bias highlighted that most studies lacked active, double-blinded controls, potentially leading to an overestimation of the effect, and making it difficult to conclusively attribute the observed improvements to the CS intervention. Hence, although effects are promising, the methodological issues highlight there is still a need for better controlled studies that provide more compelling evidence. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

认知刺激(CS)是一种非药物干预措施,通常涉及小组活动和社交互动,用于治疗痴呆症患者的认知能力下降。这项预先注册的系统评价和荟萃分析评估了 CS 在认知(主要结果)和生活质量、日常生活活动和心理症状(次要结果)方面产生益处的效果,该研究纳入了 44 项随机对照试验,包括 45 项比较,涉及 2444 名参与者。研究发现,干预后立即出现中等效应(g =.49),且有决定性的贝叶斯证据支持。临床相关性定义为阿尔茨海默病评估量表认知子量表减少 3 到 4 分;观察到的认知衰退平均衰减 2.41 分(去除 1 个异常值后)。因此,观察到的衰退具有边缘临床相关性。CS 还被发现显著改善了记忆、日常生活活动、抑郁症状和痴呆评定;这些效应中的大多数都得到了实质性和强有力的贝叶斯证据的支持。在 1 至 10 个月的随访评估中,没有发现认知、语言、生活质量、焦虑和行为症状的显著效果。然而,这些效应不存在的证据并不明确。对研究偏倚的审查强调,大多数研究缺乏积极的、双盲对照,这可能导致对效应的高估,并且难以将观察到的改善归因于 CS 干预。因此,尽管效果很有前景,但方法学问题突出表明,仍需要更好的对照研究,以提供更有说服力的证据。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2021 APA,保留所有权利)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验