Department of Health, Aging and Society, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Glob Public Health. 2022 Aug;17(8):1479-1491. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2021.1931402. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
The COVID-19 pandemic, where the need-resource gap has necessitated decision makers in some contexts to ration access to life-saving interventions, has demonstrated the critical need for systematic and fair priority setting and resource allocation mechanisms. Disease outbreaks are becoming increasingly common and priority setting lessons from previous disease outbreaks could be better harnessed to inform decision making and planning for future disease outbreaks. The purpose of this paper is to discuss how priority setting and resource allocation could, ideally, be integrated into the WHO pandemic planning and preparedness framework and used to inform the COVID-19 pandemic recovery plans and plans for future outbreaks. Priority setting and resource allocation during disease outbreaks tend to evoke a process similar to the 'rule of rescue'. This results in inefficient and unfair resource allocation, negative effects on health and non-health programs and increased health inequities. Integrating priority setting and resource allocation activities throughout the four phases of the WHO emergency preparedness framework could ensure that priority setting during health emergencies is systematic, evidence informed and fair.
新冠疫情期间,由于资源需求缺口,一些情况下的决策者需要对获取救生干预措施进行配给,这突显了建立系统和公平的优先排序和资源分配机制的重要性。疾病爆发越来越常见,从以前的疾病爆发中吸取的优先排序经验教训,可以更好地用于为未来的疾病爆发提供决策和规划信息。本文旨在讨论如何将优先排序和资源分配理想地纳入世卫组织大流行规划和准备框架,并用于为新冠疫情恢复计划和未来爆发的计划提供信息。疾病爆发期间的优先排序和资源分配往往会引发类似于“救援规则”的过程。这导致资源分配效率低下且不公平,对卫生和非卫生计划产生负面影响,并加剧健康不平等。将优先排序和资源分配活动纳入世卫组织应急准备框架的四个阶段,可以确保在卫生紧急情况下的优先排序是系统的、基于证据的和公平的。