Fox Mary T, Sidani Souraya, Butler Jeffrey I, Skinner Mark W, Macdonald Marilyn, Durocher Evelyne, Hunter Kathleen F, Wagg Adrian, Weeks Lori E, MacLeod Ann, Dahlke Sherry
School of Nursing, Faculty of Health, York University Centre for Aging Research and Education, York University, HNES suite 343, 4700 Keele St, Toronto, Ontario, M3J 1P3, Canada.
School of Nursing, Faculty of Community Services, Ryerson University, 350 Victoria Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5B 2K3, Canada.
Implement Sci Commun. 2021 Jul 22;2(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s43058-021-00179-w.
Transitional care involves time-limited interventions focusing on the continuity of care from hospital to home, to optimize patient functioning and management. Providing interventions, as part of transitional care, that optimize the functioning of older people with dementia is critical due to the small window of opportunity in which they can return to their baseline levels of functioning. Yet prior research on transitional care has not included interventions focused on functioning and did not target older people with dementia in rural communities, limiting the applicability of transitional care to this population. Accordingly, the goal of this study is to align hospital-to-home transitional care with the function-related needs of older people with dementia and their family-caregivers in rural communities.
In this multimethod study, two phases of activities are planned in rural Ontario and Nova Scotia. In phase I, a purposive sample of 15-20 people with dementia and 15-20 family-caregivers in each province will rate the acceptability of six evidence-based interventions and participate in semi-structured interviews to explore the interventions' acceptability and, where relevant, how to improve their acceptability. Acceptable interventions will be further examined in phase II, in which a purposive sample of healthcare providers, stratified by employment location (hospital vs. homecare) and role (clinician vs. decision-maker), will (1) rate the acceptability of the interventions and (2) participate in semi-structured focus group discussions on the facilitators and barriers to delivering the interventions, and suggestions to enable their incorporation into rural transitional care. Two to three focus groups per stratum (8-10 healthcare providers per focus group) will be held for a total of 8-12 focus groups per province. Data analysis will involve qualitative content analysis of interview and focus group discussions and descriptive statistics of intervention acceptability ratings.
Findings will (1) include a set of acceptable interventions for rural transitional care that promote older patients' functioning and family-caregivers' ability to support patients' functioning, (2) identify resources needed to incorporate the interventions into rural transitional care, and (3) provide high-quality evidence to inform new transitional care practices and policies and guide future research.
过渡性护理涉及有时间限制的干预措施,重点是从医院到家庭的护理连续性,以优化患者的功能和管理。作为过渡性护理的一部分,提供能够优化老年痴呆症患者功能的干预措施至关重要,因为他们恢复到基线功能水平的机会窗口很小。然而,先前关于过渡性护理的研究并未包括侧重于功能的干预措施,也未针对农村社区的老年痴呆症患者,这限制了过渡性护理对此类人群的适用性。因此,本研究的目标是使医院到家的过渡性护理与农村社区老年痴呆症患者及其家庭照顾者与功能相关的需求相匹配。
在这项多方法研究中,计划在安大略省农村地区和新斯科舍省开展两个阶段的活动。在第一阶段,每个省份将选取15至20名痴呆症患者和15至20名家庭照顾者作为有目的的样本,对六种循证干预措施的可接受性进行评分,并参与半结构化访谈,以探讨干预措施的可接受性以及在相关情况下如何提高其可接受性。在第二阶段将进一步研究可接受的干预措施,在该阶段,将选取按就业地点(医院与家庭护理)和角色(临床医生与决策者)分层的有目的的医疗保健提供者样本,(1)对干预措施的可接受性进行评分,(2)参与关于实施干预措施的促进因素和障碍以及将其纳入农村过渡性护理的建议的半结构化焦点小组讨论。每个阶层将举行两到三个焦点小组(每个焦点小组8至10名医疗保健提供者),每个省份总共将举行8至12个焦点小组。数据分析将包括对访谈和焦点小组讨论的定性内容分析以及干预措施可接受性评分的描述性统计。
研究结果将(1)包括一套适用于农村过渡性护理的可接受干预措施,这些措施可促进老年患者的功能以及家庭照顾者支持患者功能的能力,(2)确定将干预措施纳入农村过渡性护理所需的资源,(3)提供高质量的证据,为新的过渡性护理实践和政策提供信息并指导未来的研究。