Coco Danilo, Leanza Silvana
Department of General Surgery, Ospedali Riuniti Marche Nord, Pesaro, Italy.
Department of General Surgery, Carlo Urbani Hospital, Jesi, Ancona, Italy.
Clin Exp Hepatol. 2021 Jun;7(2):125-133. doi: 10.5114/ceh.2021.106521. Epub 2021 May 28.
The liver is considered as one of the most common sites of metastasis and a key determining factor of survival in patients with isolated colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM). For longer survival of patients, surgical resection is the only available option. Especially in CRLM bilobar patients, to achieve R0 resection, maintaining an adequate volume of the future liver remnant (FLR) is the main technical challenge to avoid post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF). As standard procedures in the treatment of patients with severe metastatic liver disease, techniques such as portal vein embolization/portal vein ligation (PVE/PVL) accompanied by two-stage hepatectomy (TSH) have been introduced. These methods, however, have drawbacks depending on the severity of the disease and the capacity of the patient to expand the liver remnant. Eventually, implementation of the novel ALPPS technique ignited excitement among the community of hepatobiliary surgeons because ALPPS challenged the idea of unrespectability and extended the limit of liver surgery and it was reported that FLR hypertrophy of up to 80% was induced in a shorter time than PVL or PVE. Nonetheless, ALPPS techniques caused serious concerns due to the associated high morbidity and mortality levels of up to 40% and 15% respectively, and PHLF and bile leak are critical morbidity- and mortality-related factors. Carefully establishing the associated risk factors of ALPPS has opened up a new dimension in the field of ALPPS technique for improved surgical outcome by carefully choosing patients. The benefit of ALPPS technique is enhanced when performed for young patients with very borderline remnant volume. Adopting ALPPS technical modifications such as middle hepatic vein preservation, surgical management of the hepatoduodenal ligament, the anterior approach and partial ALPPS may lead to the improvement of ALPPS surgical performance. Research findings to validate the translatability of ALPPS' theoretical advantages into real survival benefits are scarce.
肝脏被认为是最常见的转移部位之一,也是孤立性结直肠癌肝转移(CRLM)患者生存的关键决定因素。为了使患者获得更长的生存期,手术切除是唯一可行的选择。特别是在CRLM双叶患者中,为实现R0切除,维持足够的未来肝残余量(FLR)是避免肝切除术后肝衰竭(PHLF)的主要技术挑战。作为治疗严重转移性肝病患者的标准程序,已引入了诸如门静脉栓塞/门静脉结扎(PVE/PVL)并伴有两阶段肝切除术(TSH)等技术。然而,这些方法存在缺点,具体取决于疾病的严重程度和患者肝脏残余量扩大的能力。最终,新型ALPPS技术的应用在肝胆外科医生群体中引起了轰动,因为ALPPS挑战了不可行的观念,扩展了肝脏手术的极限,并且据报道,与PVL或PVE相比,ALPPS能在更短的时间内使FLR肥大高达80%。尽管如此,ALPPS技术因其分别高达40%和15%的高发病率和死亡率而引发了严重关注,并且PHLF和胆漏是与发病率和死亡率相关的关键因素。仔细确定ALPPS的相关危险因素,通过仔细选择患者,在ALPPS技术领域开辟了一个新的维度,以改善手术结果。对于残余量非常临界的年轻患者实施ALPPS技术时,其益处会增强。采用诸如保留肝中静脉、肝十二指肠韧带的手术管理、前入路和部分ALPPS等ALPPS技术改良措施,可能会改善ALPPS的手术效果。关于验证ALPPS理论优势转化为实际生存益处的可转化性的研究结果很少。