Royal Holloway, University of London, UK.
University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Br J Psychol. 2022 Feb;113(1):226-247. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12523. Epub 2021 Jul 23.
Although people can categorize others' sexual orientation (e.g., gay/lesbian vs. straight) from their facial appearance, not everyone defines their sexual orientation categorically. Indeed, many individuals within the same sexual orientation category experience different degrees of own- and other-gender attraction. Moving beyond sexual orientation categories, we found that perceivers' judgments of individuals' sexual attraction correlated with those individuals' self-reported degrees of attraction to women and men. Similar to past work on sexual orientation categories, facial affect cued sexual attraction in men whereas gender typicality cued sexual attraction in women. Moreover, asking participants to categorize the targets as 'not straight' versus 'straight' revealed a linear pattern distinct from the discrete category thresholds typical of other social groups (e.g., race). Facial appearance thus reveals nuances in sexual attraction that support sexual orientation categorizations. These findings refine understanding of social categorization more broadly.
尽管人们可以从面部特征来对他人的性取向(例如,同性恋/异性恋与直人)进行分类,但并不是每个人都将自己的性取向绝对地定义为某一种。事实上,同一性取向类别的许多人对自身和他人的性别吸引力有不同程度的体验。超越性取向类别,我们发现感知者对个体性吸引力的判断与个体自我报告的对女性和男性的吸引力程度相关。与过去关于性取向类别的工作类似,面部表情会暗示男性的性吸引力,而性别典型性则暗示女性的性吸引力。此外,要求参与者将目标归类为“非直人”与“直人”,揭示了一种与其他社会群体(例如种族)典型的离散类别阈值不同的线性模式。因此,面部特征揭示了性吸引力的细微差别,支持了性取向的分类。这些发现更广泛地深化了对社会分类的理解。