Suppr超能文献

乳腺癌护理质量指标:系统评价。

Quality indicators for breast cancer care: A systematic review.

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Complexo Hospitalario de Ourense, Ourense, Spain; Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Granada, Granada, Spain; Department of General Surgery, Hospital de Verín, Ourense, Spain.

Department of General Surgery, Complexo Hospitalario de Ourense, Ourense, Spain.

出版信息

Breast. 2021 Oct;59:221-231. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2021.06.013. Epub 2021 Jul 2.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated breast cancer (BC) care quality indicators (QIs) in clinical pathways and integrated health care processes.

METHODS

Following protocol registration (Prospero n: CRD42021228867), relevant documents were identified, without language restrictions, through a systematic search of bibliographic databases (EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, MEDLINE), health care valuable representatives and the World Wide Web in April 2021. Data concerning QIs, measurement tools and compliance standards were extracted from European and North American sources in duplicate with 98% reviewer agreement.

RESULTS

There were 89 QIs found from 22 selected documents (QI per document mean 13.5 with standard deviation 11.9). The Belgian (38 QIs) and the EUSOMA (European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists) (34 QIs) documents were the ones that best reported the QIs. No identical QI was identified in all the documents analysed. There were 67/89 QIs covering processes (75.3%) and 11/89 (12.4%) for each structure and outcomes QIs. There were 21/89 QIs for diagnosis (30.3%), 43/89 for treatment (48.3%), and 19/89 for staging, counselling, follow-up and rehabilitation (21.4%). Of 67 process QIs and 11 outcome QIs, 20/78 (26%) did not report a minimum standard of care. Shared decision making was only included as a QI in the Italian document.

CONCLUSION

More than half of countries have not established a national clinical pathway or integrated breast cancer care process to achieve the excellence of BC care. There was heterogeneity in QIs for the evaluation of BC care quality. Over two-thirds of the clinical pathways and integrated health care processes did not provide a minimum auditable standard of care for compliance, leaving open the definition of best practice. There is a need for harmonisation of BC care QIs.

摘要

目的

我们评估了临床路径和综合医疗流程中的乳腺癌(BC)护理质量指标(QI)。

方法

按照方案注册(Prospero 编号:CRD42021228867),于 2021 年 4 月通过系统检索文献数据库(EMBASE、Scopus、Web of Science、MEDLINE)、医疗保健有价值的代表和万维网,不限制语言,确定了相关文件。从欧洲和北美的来源中提取了与 QI、测量工具和合规标准相关的数据,由 2 名审核员进行了重复审核,审核员间的一致性为 98%。

结果

从 22 篇选定的文献中找到了 89 个 QI(每篇文献的平均 QI 为 13.5,标准差为 11.9)。比利时(38 个 QI)和欧洲乳腺肿瘤专家学会(EUSOMA)(34 个 QI)的文献最好地报告了 QI。在所有分析的文献中,没有发现完全相同的 QI。67/89 个 QI 涵盖了流程(75.3%),11/89 个 QI 分别涵盖了结构和结果(12.4%)。21/89 个 QI 用于诊断(30.3%),43/89 个 QI 用于治疗(48.3%),19/89 个 QI 用于分期、咨询、随访和康复(21.4%)。在 67 个流程 QI 和 11 个结果 QI 中,20/78(26%)未报告最低护理标准。意大利的文献仅将共同决策作为一个 QI 纳入。

结论

超过一半的国家尚未建立国家临床路径或综合乳腺癌护理流程,以实现乳腺癌护理的卓越。评估乳腺癌护理质量的 QI 存在异质性。超过三分之二的临床路径和综合医疗流程没有为合规提供可审核的最低护理标准,从而为最佳实践的定义留下了空间。有必要协调乳腺癌护理 QI。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7747/8322135/6de75d5c846e/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验