Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, University Mohammed V, Rabat, Morocco.
Optics and Photonics Center, Moroccan Foundation for Advanced Science and Innovation and Research, University Mohammed VI Polytechnic, Rabat, Morocco.
Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 23;11(1):15093. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-94143-2.
Optical sensors based on surface plasmon resonance (SPR) in the attenuated total reflection (ATR) configuration in layered media have attracted considerable attention over the past decades owing to their ability of label free sensing in biomolecular interaction analysis, and highly sensitive detection of changes in refractive index and thickness, i.e. the optical thickness, of thin film adsorbates (thin film sensing). Furthermore, SPR is highly sensitive to the refractive index of the medium adjacent to the bare metal, and it allows for bulk sensing as well. When deposited at the metal/air interface, an adsorbed layer disturbs the highly localized, i.e. bound, wave at this interface and changes the plasmon resonance to allow for sensing in angular or wavelength interrogation and intensity measurement modes. A high degree of sensitivity is required for precise and efficient sensing, especially for biomolecular interaction analysis for early stage diagnostics; and besides conventional SPR (CSPR), several other configurations have been developed in recent years targeting sensitivity, including long-range SPR (LRSPR) and waveguide-coupled SPR (WGSPR) observed in MIM structures, referred here to by MIM modes, resulting from the coupling of SPRs at I/M interfaces, and Fano-type resonances occurring from broad and sharp modes coupling in layered structures. In our previous research, we demonstrated that MIM is better than CSPR for bulk sensing, and in this paper, we show that CSPR is better than MIM for thin film sensing for thicknesses of the sensing layer (SL) larger than 10 nm. We discuss and compare the sensitivity of CSPR and MIM for thin film sensing by using both experiments and theoretical calculations based on rigorous electromagnetic (EM) theory. We discuss in detail MIM modes coupling and anti-crossing, and we show that when a thin film adsorbate, i.e. a SL), is deposited on top of the outermost-layer of an optimized MIM structure, it modifies the characteristics of the coupled modes of the structure, and it reduces the electric field, both inside the SL and at the SL/air interface, and as a result, it decreases the sensitivity of the MIM versus the CSPR sensor. Our work is of critical importance to plasmonic mode coupling using MIM configurations, as well as to optical bio- and chemical-sensing.
基于分层介质中表面等离子体共振(SPR)的光传感器在衰减全反射(ATR)配置中,由于其在生物分子相互作用分析中无标记传感的能力以及对薄膜吸附物(薄膜传感)折射率和厚度即光学厚度变化的高灵敏度检测,在过去几十年中引起了相当大的关注。此外,SPR 对与裸露金属相邻的介质的折射率非常敏感,并且允许进行体相传感。当沉积在金属/空气界面时,吸附层会干扰该界面处高度局域的即束缚波,并改变等离子体共振,从而允许在角度或波长询问和强度测量模式下进行传感。为了实现精确和高效的传感,需要高度的灵敏度,特别是对于用于早期诊断的生物分子相互作用分析;除了传统的 SPR(CSPR)之外,近年来还开发了几种其他配置来提高灵敏度,包括在 MIM 结构中观察到的长程 SPR(LRSPR)和波导耦合 SPR(WGSPR),这里称为 MIM 模式,这是由于 I/M 界面处 SPR 的耦合产生的,以及在分层结构中宽和锐模式耦合产生的 Fano 型共振。在我们之前的研究中,我们证明了 MIM 对于体相传感优于 CSPR,在本文中,我们表明对于厚度大于 10nm 的薄膜传感,CSPR 优于 MIM。我们通过实验和基于严格电磁(EM)理论的理论计算讨论和比较了 CSPR 和 MIM 对于薄膜传感的灵敏度。我们详细讨论了 MIM 模式的耦合和反交叉,并且表明当薄膜吸附物即 SL)沉积在优化的 MIM 结构的最外层之上时,它会改变结构的耦合模式的特性,并减小 SL 内部和 SL/空气界面处的电场,结果降低了 MIM 相对于 CSPR 传感器的灵敏度。我们的工作对于使用 MIM 配置的等离子体模式耦合以及光学生物和化学传感都具有重要意义。