• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探索烧伤患者的“重返生产力”:烧伤模型系统国家数据库报告。

Exploring "Return to Productivity" Among People Living With Burn Injury: A Burn Model System National Database Report.

机构信息

Division of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.

Regional Burn Center at Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, California, USA.

出版信息

J Burn Care Res. 2021 Nov 24;42(6):1081-1086. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irab139.

DOI:10.1093/jbcr/irab139
PMID:34302467
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9255661/
Abstract

Burn survivors experience barriers to returning to work. For those who do return to work, little is known regarding whether they achieve preinjury productivity (i.e., equivalent or gain in income compared to preinjury income). Identifying patients at risk of not achieving preinjury productivity is important for targeting services that support this population. They extracted occupational and income data through 24 months postinjury from the multicenter, longitudinal Burn Model System National Database. Annual income was reported in six groups: <$25k, $25k-50k, $50k-99k, $100k-149k, $150k-199k, and $>199k. Participants were classified by change in income at each follow-up (i.e., gain, loss, and equivalent). Explanatory variables included demographics, injury characteristics, insurance payer, employment status, and job type. Multilevel, multivariable logistic regression was used to model return to productivity. Four hundred fifty-three participants provided complete income data at discharge and follow-up. Of the 302 participants employed preinjury, 180 (60%) returned to work within 24 months postinjury. Less than half (138) returned to productivity (46% of participants employed preinjury; 77% of those who returned to work). Characteristics associated with return to productivity included older age (median 46.9 vs 45.9 years, OR 1.03, P = .006), Hispanic ethnicity (24% vs 11%, OR 1.80, P = 0.041), burn size >20% TBSA (33.7% vs 33.0%, OR 2.09, P = 0.045), and postinjury employment (54% vs 26%, OR 3.41, P < 0.001). More than half of employed people living with burn injury experienced loss in productivity within 24 months postinjury. Even if they return to work, people living with burn injuries face challenges returning to productivity and may benefit from vocational rehabilitation and/or financial assistance.

摘要

烧伤幸存者在重返工作岗位时会遇到障碍。对于那些确实重返工作岗位的人,对于他们是否能达到受伤前的生产力(即与受伤前的收入相比收入相等或增加)知之甚少。确定有无法达到受伤前生产力风险的患者对于为支持这一人群的服务提供目标非常重要。他们通过烧伤模型系统国家数据库(Burn Model System National Database)从多中心、纵向研究中提取了受伤后 24 个月的职业和收入数据。年收入分为六组报告:<$25k、$25k-50k、$50k-99k、$100k-149k、$150k-199k 和>$199k。参与者根据每次随访时收入的变化进行分类(即增加、减少和相等)。解释变量包括人口统计学特征、损伤特征、保险支付方、就业状况和工作类型。使用多层次多变量逻辑回归模型来模拟恢复生产力。453 名参与者在出院和随访时提供了完整的收入数据。在 302 名受伤前就业的参与者中,有 180 名(60%)在受伤后 24 个月内重返工作岗位。不到一半(138 人)恢复了生产力(受伤前就业人数的 46%;重返工作岗位人数的 77%)。与恢复生产力相关的特征包括年龄较大(中位数 46.9 岁与 45.9 岁,OR 1.03,P =.006)、西班牙裔(24%与 11%,OR 1.80,P = 0.041)、烧伤面积>20%TBSA(33.7%与 33.0%,OR 2.09,P = 0.045)和受伤后就业(54%与 26%,OR 3.41,P <0.001)。超过一半的烧伤后就业的人在受伤后 24 个月内经历了生产力下降。即使他们重返工作岗位,烧伤后就业的人在恢复生产力方面也面临挑战,可能受益于职业康复和/或经济援助。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a655/9255661/839bef31af95/nihms-1820137-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a655/9255661/44b65461e1c3/nihms-1820137-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a655/9255661/08ccc46f480e/nihms-1820137-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a655/9255661/999bd0b6a396/nihms-1820137-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a655/9255661/061e9051081a/nihms-1820137-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a655/9255661/839bef31af95/nihms-1820137-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a655/9255661/44b65461e1c3/nihms-1820137-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a655/9255661/08ccc46f480e/nihms-1820137-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a655/9255661/999bd0b6a396/nihms-1820137-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a655/9255661/061e9051081a/nihms-1820137-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a655/9255661/839bef31af95/nihms-1820137-f0005.jpg

相似文献

1
Exploring "Return to Productivity" Among People Living With Burn Injury: A Burn Model System National Database Report.探索烧伤患者的“重返生产力”:烧伤模型系统国家数据库报告。
J Burn Care Res. 2021 Nov 24;42(6):1081-1086. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irab139.
2
Factors Affecting Employment After Burn Injury in the United States: A Burn Model System National Database Investigation.影响美国烧伤后就业的因素:烧伤模型系统国家数据库调查。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 Jan;101(1S):S71-S85. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2019.09.009. Epub 2019 Oct 15.
3
Return-to-employment for working-aged adults after burn injury: A mixed methods scoping review.烧伤后工作年龄段成年人的重返工作岗位:混合方法范围综述。
Work. 2024;79(2):523-550. doi: 10.3233/WOR-230148.
4
Acute predictors of return to employment after traumatic brain injury: a longitudinal follow-up.创伤性脑损伤后恢复工作的急性预测因素:一项纵向随访研究
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002 May;83(5):635-41. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2002.31605.
5
Return to work after specialised burn care: A two-year prospective follow-up study of the prevalence, predictors and related costs.专科烧伤护理后的重返工作:一项关于患病率、预测因素及相关成本的两年前瞻性随访研究
Injury. 2016 Sep;47(9):1975-82. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.03.031. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
6
Predictive Factors for Returning to Work in Burn Adult Patients That Were Working Before Their Injury.烧伤成人患者伤前有工作,预测其重返工作岗位的因素。
J Burn Care Res. 2021 Mar 4;42(2):294-299. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/iraa140.
7
Association between community distress and return to work after burn injury.烧伤后社区困扰与重返工作岗位之间的关联。
Burns. 2025 Feb;51(1):107294. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2024.107294. Epub 2024 Oct 18.
8
Reasons for Distress Among Burn Survivors at 6, 12, and 24 Months Postdischarge: A Burn Injury Model System Investigation.烧伤幸存者出院后 6、12 和 24 个月时的困扰原因:烧伤康复模型系统研究。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Jul;99(7):1311-1317. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.11.007. Epub 2017 Dec 16.
9
Employment outcomes after burn injury: a comparison of those burned at work and those burned outside of work.烧伤后的就业结果:工作中烧伤者与工作外烧伤者的比较。
J Burn Care Res. 2011 Mar-Apr;32(2):294-301. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e31820aaf56.
10
Impact of Work-Related Burn Injury on Social Reintegration Outcomes: A Life Impact Burn Recovery Evaluation (LIBRE) Study.工作相关烧伤对社会再融入结果的影响:生活影响烧伤恢复评估 (LIBRE) 研究。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 Jan;101(1S):S86-S91. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.10.022. Epub 2017 Nov 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Global, regional and national burden of injuries caused by fire, heat, and hot substances from 1990 to 2021.1990年至2021年全球、区域和国家火灾、高温及热物质所致伤害负担
PLoS One. 2025 May 20;20(5):e0324481. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324481. eCollection 2025.
2
Assessing Return to Work Outcomes for Individuals Affected by Burn Injuries: A Comprehensive Study.评估烧伤患者的重返工作成果:一项综合研究。
Cureus. 2024 Feb 18;16(2):e54410. doi: 10.7759/cureus.54410. eCollection 2024 Feb.
3
A Narrative Review of Outcomes in Burn Rehabilitation Based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health.

本文引用的文献

1
The Impact of Burn Size on Community Participation: A Life Impact Burn Recovery Evaluation (LIBRE) Study.烧伤面积对社区参与的影响:一项生活影响烧伤康复评估(LIBRE)研究。
Ann Surg. 2022 Dec 1;276(6):1056-1062. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004703. Epub 2020 Dec 18.
2
Factors Affecting Employment After Burn Injury in the United States: A Burn Model System National Database Investigation.影响美国烧伤后就业的因素:烧伤模型系统国家数据库调查。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 Jan;101(1S):S71-S85. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2019.09.009. Epub 2019 Oct 15.
3
Postacute Care Setting Is Associated With Employment After Burn Injury.
基于国际功能、残疾和健康分类的烧伤康复结局的叙述性综述。
Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2023 Nov;34(4):867-881. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2023.05.006. Epub 2023 Jun 25.
4
Trajectories of physical health-related quality of life among adults living with burn injuries: A burn model system national database investigation to improve early intervention and rehabilitation service delivery.烧伤成年人身体健康相关生活质量轨迹:改善早期干预和康复服务提供的烧伤模型系统国家数据库研究。
Rehabil Psychol. 2023 Aug;68(3):313-323. doi: 10.1037/rep0000508. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
5
Higher Out-of-pocket Expenses are Associated with Worse Health-related Quality of Life in Burn Survivors: A Northwest Regional Burn Model System Investigation.较高的自付费用与烧伤幸存者的健康相关生活质量较差相关:西北区域烧伤模型系统研究。
J Burn Care Res. 2023 Nov 2;44(6):1349-1354. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irad058.
6
Peer Support Groups: Identifying Disparities to Improve Participation.同伴支持小组:发现差异,提高参与度。
J Burn Care Res. 2022 Sep 1;43(5):1019-1023. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irac086.
急性后期照护机构与烧伤后就业相关。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Nov;100(11):2015-2021. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2019.06.007. Epub 2019 Jul 3.
4
Fatigue Following Burn Injury: A Burn Model System National Database Study.烧伤后疲劳:烧伤模型系统国家数据库研究
J Burn Care Res. 2018 Apr 20;39(3):450-456. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000625.
5
An Intervention Bundle to Facilitate Return to Work for Burn-Injured Workers: Report From a Burn Model System Investigation.促进烧伤工人重返工作岗位的干预组合:烧伤模型系统调查的报告
J Burn Care Res. 2017 Jan/Feb;38(1):e70-e78. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000410.
6
Predictors of functional independence, quality of life, and return to work in patients with burn injuries in mainland China.中国大陆烧伤患者功能独立性、生活质量及重返工作岗位的预测因素。
Burns Trauma. 2016 Nov 4;4:32. doi: 10.1186/s41038-016-0058-4. eCollection 2016.
7
The National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research Burn Model System: Twenty Years of Contributions to Clinical Service and Research.美国国立残疾、独立生活和康复研究所在烧伤模型系统方面:对临床服务和研究的二十年贡献。
J Burn Care Res. 2017 Jan/Feb;38(1):e240-e253. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000361.
8
Return to work after specialised burn care: A two-year prospective follow-up study of the prevalence, predictors and related costs.专科烧伤护理后的重返工作:一项关于患病率、预测因素及相关成本的两年前瞻性随访研究
Injury. 2016 Sep;47(9):1975-82. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.03.031. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
9
Return to work after burn injury: a systematic review.烧伤后重返工作岗位:一项系统综述。
J Burn Care Res. 2012 Jan-Feb;33(1):101-9. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e3182374439.
10
Underemployment in America: measurement and evidence.美国的就业不足:衡量方法与证据
Am J Community Psychol. 2003 Sep;32(1-2):21-31. doi: 10.1023/a:1025686621578.