• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

烧伤成人患者伤前有工作,预测其重返工作岗位的因素。

Predictive Factors for Returning to Work in Burn Adult Patients That Were Working Before Their Injury.

机构信息

Centro Nacional de Investigación y Atención a Quemados (CENIAQ).

Burn Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine Department.

出版信息

J Burn Care Res. 2021 Mar 4;42(2):294-299. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/iraa140.

DOI:10.1093/jbcr/iraa140
PMID:33128060
Abstract

The goal of this study was to identify predictive factors that influence return to work in burn patients treated at the National Center for Burn Care and Research at the National Institute of Rehabilitation (CENIAQ) in México City. This is a retrospective case-control study that included all burn patients of working age (16-91 years old), treated between January 2011 and December 2013. Patients were divided into two groups: unemployed (no work group) and those who returned to work (RTW). The statistical analysis was performed by a logistic regression univariate and multivariate analysis. A total of 210 subjects were included in the study. The mean age was 38 ± 15 years and 66.7% of them were male. One hundred sixty-five patients (79.6%) were able to return to work after treatment. Through univariate analysis it was found that the predictive factors for not returning to work after injury were: education lower than elementary school (OR: 3.59; CI 95%: 1.79-7.32); history of epilepsy prior to burn injury (OR: 10.18; CI 95%: 1.9-54.43); total burned surface area (TBSA) ≥20% (OR: 2.87; CI 95%: 1.46-5.64); third-degree burns (OR: 2.64; CI 95%: 1.32-5.29); hospital stay ≥20 days (OR: 2.8; CI 95%: 1.47-5.68); length of stay in the burn intensive care unit (OR: 2.5; CI 95%: 1.25-4.97); secondary infection (OR: 2.24; CI 95%: 1.15-4.38); amputations (one or more regardless of amputation level; OR: 8; CI 95%: 2.52-25.30); burn of the upper extremity (shoulder; OR: 2.21; CI 95%: 0.97-5.03); thigh (OR: 2.41; CI 95%: 1.32-5.14); and knee (OR: 2.81; CI 95%: 1.21-6.55). Some of these factors have never been reported by other authors.

摘要

本研究旨在确定影响在墨西哥城国家康复研究所国家烧伤中心(CENIAQ)接受治疗的烧伤患者重返工作岗位的预测因素。这是一项回顾性病例对照研究,纳入了所有年龄在 16-91 岁之间、2011 年 1 月至 2013 年 12 月期间接受治疗的在职烧伤患者。患者分为两组:失业(无工作组)和重返工作(RTW)。统计分析采用单因素和多因素 logistic 回归分析。共有 210 例患者纳入本研究。平均年龄为 38±15 岁,其中 66.7%为男性。165 例患者(79.6%)在治疗后能够重返工作岗位。通过单因素分析,发现受伤后无法重返工作岗位的预测因素包括:受教育程度低于小学(OR:3.59;95%CI:1.79-7.32);烧伤前有癫痫病史(OR:10.18;95%CI:1.9-54.43);总烧伤面积(TBSA)≥20%(OR:2.87;95%CI:1.46-5.64);三度烧伤(OR:2.64;95%CI:1.32-5.29);住院时间≥20 天(OR:2.8;CI 95%:1.47-5.68);烧伤重症监护病房住院时间(OR:2.5;CI 95%:1.25-4.97);继发感染(OR:2.24;CI 95%:1.15-4.38);截肢(无论截肢水平如何,一个或多个;OR:8;CI 95%:2.52-25.30);上肢烧伤(肩部;OR:2.21;CI 95%:0.97-5.03);大腿(OR:2.41;CI 95%:1.32-5.14);和膝盖(OR:2.81;CI 95%:1.21-6.55)。其中一些因素以前从未被其他作者报道过。

相似文献

1
Predictive Factors for Returning to Work in Burn Adult Patients That Were Working Before Their Injury.烧伤成人患者伤前有工作,预测其重返工作岗位的因素。
J Burn Care Res. 2021 Mar 4;42(2):294-299. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/iraa140.
2
Employment outcomes after burn injury: a comparison of those burned at work and those burned outside of work.烧伤后的就业结果:工作中烧伤者与工作外烧伤者的比较。
J Burn Care Res. 2011 Mar-Apr;32(2):294-301. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e31820aaf56.
3
Return to work after specialised burn care: A two-year prospective follow-up study of the prevalence, predictors and related costs.专科烧伤护理后的重返工作:一项关于患病率、预测因素及相关成本的两年前瞻性随访研究
Injury. 2016 Sep;47(9):1975-82. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.03.031. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
4
The impact of discharge contracture on return to work after burn injury: A Burn Model System investigation.烧伤后重返工作对出院挛缩的影响:烧伤模型系统研究。
Burns. 2020 May;46(3):539-545. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2020.02.001. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
5
Exploring "Return to Productivity" Among People Living With Burn Injury: A Burn Model System National Database Report.探索烧伤患者的“重返生产力”:烧伤模型系统国家数据库报告。
J Burn Care Res. 2021 Nov 24;42(6):1081-1086. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irab139.
6
Factors Affecting Employment After Burn Injury in the United States: A Burn Model System National Database Investigation.影响美国烧伤后就业的因素:烧伤模型系统国家数据库调查。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 Jan;101(1S):S71-S85. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2019.09.009. Epub 2019 Oct 15.
7
Return to work six months after burn: a prospective study at the Helsinki Burn Center.烧伤后六个月重返工作岗位:赫尔辛基烧伤中心的一项前瞻性研究。
Burns. 2015 Sep;41(6):1152-60. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2015.06.010. Epub 2015 Jul 16.
8
Barriers impacting employment after burn injury.烧伤后影响就业的障碍。
J Burn Care Res. 2009 Mar-Apr;30(2):294-300. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e318198a2c2.
9
[Epidemiological characteristics and outcome analysis of 266 patients with inhalation injuries combined with total burn area less than 30% total body surface area].266例吸入性损伤合并烧伤总面积小于30%体表面积患者的流行病学特征及预后分析
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2021 Apr 20;37(4):340-349. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20200229-00106.
10
Long term mortality in critically ill burn survivors.重症烧伤幸存者的长期死亡率。
Burns. 2017 Sep;43(6):1155-1162. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2017.05.010. Epub 2017 Jun 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Life Satisfaction After Burn Injury-A Comprehensive Review.烧伤后生活满意度——一项综合综述
Eur Burn J. 2024 Nov 20;5(4):418-428. doi: 10.3390/ebj5040037.
2
Peer Support Groups: Identifying Disparities to Improve Participation.同伴支持小组:发现差异,提高参与度。
J Burn Care Res. 2022 Sep 1;43(5):1019-1023. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irac086.
3
Life after Burn, Part I: Health-Related Quality of Life, Employment and Life Satisfaction.烧伤后的生活,第一部分:健康相关生活质量、就业和生活满意度。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Apr 27;58(5):599. doi: 10.3390/medicina58050599.