相似文献
1
Evaluation of extraction-free RT-qPCR methods for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics.
Arch Virol. 2021 Oct;166(10):2825-2828. doi: 10.1007/s00705-021-05165-0. Epub 2021 Jul 24.
2
Highly sensitive extraction-free saliva-based molecular assay for rapid diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2.
J Clin Microbiol. 2024 Jun 12;62(6):e0060024. doi: 10.1128/jcm.00600-24. Epub 2024 May 24.
3
Extraction-free protocol combining proteinase K and heat inactivation for detection of SARS-CoV-2 by RT-qPCR.
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 26;16(2):e0247792. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247792. eCollection 2021.
4
Comparative effects of viral-transport-medium heat inactivation upon downstream SARS-CoV-2 detection in patient samples.
J Med Microbiol. 2021 Mar;70(3). doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.001301. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
5
Comparison of Throat Washings, Nasopharyngeal Swabs and Oropharyngeal Swabs for Detection of SARS-CoV-2.
Viruses. 2021 Apr 10;13(4):653. doi: 10.3390/v13040653.
6
Evaluation of an Automated High-Throughput Liquid-Based RNA Extraction Platform on Pooled Nasopharyngeal or Saliva Specimens for SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR.
Viruses. 2021 Apr 2;13(4):615. doi: 10.3390/v13040615.
7
Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 indirect and direct RT-qPCR detection methods.
Virol J. 2021 May 17;18(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12985-021-01574-4.
8
Accuracy of a RT-qPCR SARS-CoV-2 detection assay without prior RNA extraction.
J Virol Methods. 2021 Jan;287:113969. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2020.113969. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
9
Robust Saliva-Based RNA Extraction-Free One-Step Nucleic Acid Amplification Test for Mass SARS-CoV-2 Monitoring.
Molecules. 2021 Oct 31;26(21):6617. doi: 10.3390/molecules26216617.
10
Over 90% of clinical swabs used for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics contain sufficient nucleic acid concentrations.
J Med Virol. 2021 May;93(5):2848-2856. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26706. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
引用本文的文献
1
Direct real-time RT-PCR for the detection of dengue virus from patient serum in Lao PDR.
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 18;20(8):e0330459. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330459. eCollection 2025.
2
Comparative Bioinformatic Analysis Reveals Conserved Regions in SARS-CoV-2 Genome for RAPID Pandemic Response.
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 May 25;25(11):5764. doi: 10.3390/ijms25115764.
3
The Diagnostic Performance of Various Clinical Specimens for the Detection of COVID-19: A Meta-Analysis of RT-PCR Studies.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Sep 26;13(19):3057. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13193057.
4
Long follow-up of BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine in healthcare workers (2020-2022): A retrospective longitudinal SARS-CoV-2 serological surveillance.
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2023 Aug;19(2):2258632. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2258632. Epub 2023 Sep 19.
5
SARS-CoV2 in public spaces in West London, UK during COVID-19 pandemic.
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2023 May;10(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2022-001574.
6
Evaluation of STANDARD M10 SARS-CoV-2 assay as a diagnostic tool for SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal or oropharyngeal swab samples.
J Clin Virol Plus. 2023 Feb;3(1):100129. doi: 10.1016/j.jcvp.2022.100129. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
7
High Diagnostic Accuracy of a Novel Lateral Flow Assay for the Point-of-Care Detection of SARS-CoV-2.
Biomedicines. 2022 Jun 30;10(7):1558. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10071558.
8
Efficacy of the Sentinox Spray in Reducing Viral Load in Mild COVID-19 and Its Virucidal Activity against Other Respiratory Viruses: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial and an In Vitro Study.
Viruses. 2022 May 12;14(5):1033. doi: 10.3390/v14051033.
9
Clinical Evaluation of Nasopharyngeal, Oropharyngeal, Nasal Swabs, and Saliva for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 by Direct RT-PCR.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Apr 27;12(5):1091. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12051091.
10
Comparative Diagnostic Accuracy of the STANDARD M10 Assay for the Molecular Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 in the Point-of-Care and Critical Care Settings.
J Clin Med. 2022 Apr 27;11(9):2465. doi: 10.3390/jcm11092465.
本文引用的文献
1
Multiplexed and Extraction-Free Amplification for Simplified SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR Tests.
Anal Chem. 2021 Mar 9;93(9):4160-4165. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c03918. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
2
Evaluation of three extraction-free SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR assays: A feasible alternative approach with low technical requirements.
J Virol Methods. 2021 May;291:114086. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2021.114086. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
3
The effect of heat-treatment on SARS-CoV-2 viability and detection.
J Virol Methods. 2021 Apr;290:114087. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2021.114087. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
4
Extraction-Free Methods for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 by Reverse Transcription-PCR: a Comparison with the Cepheid Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 Assay across Two Medical Centers.
J Clin Microbiol. 2021 Jan 21;59(2). doi: 10.1128/JCM.02643-20.
5
Direct RT-qPCR detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA from patient nasopharyngeal swabs without an RNA extraction step.
PLoS Biol. 2020 Oct 2;18(10):e3000896. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000896. eCollection 2020 Oct.
6
Massive and rapid COVID-19 testing is feasible by extraction-free SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR.
Nat Commun. 2020 Sep 23;11(1):4812. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18611-5.
7
Systematic review with meta-analysis of the accuracy of diagnostic tests for COVID-19.
Am J Infect Control. 2021 Jan;49(1):21-29. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2020.07.011. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
8
Review of Burden, Clinical Definitions, and Management of COVID-19 Cases.
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020 Aug;103(2):625-638. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.20-0564. Epub 2020 Jul 1.
9
Heat inactivation decreases the qualitative real-time RT-PCR detection rates of clinical samples with high cycle threshold values in COVID-19.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2020 Sep;98(1):115109. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2020.115109. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
10
A Review of Current Interventions for COVID-19 Prevention.
Arch Med Res. 2020 Jul;51(5):363-374. doi: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2020.04.020. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
Zotero 插件