Suppr超能文献

酮康唑与灰黄霉素治疗足癣的比较。

Comparison of ketoconazole and griseofulvin in the treatment of tinea pedis.

作者信息

Roberts D T, Cox N H, Gentles J C, Babu K K

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Western Infirmary, Glasgow, U.K.

出版信息

J Med Vet Mycol. 1987 Oct;25(5):347-50. doi: 10.1080/02681218780000421.

Abstract

Twenty-nine patients with mycologically proven tinea pedis were randomly allocated to oral treatment with either ketoconazole 200 mg daily or griseofulvin 1 g daily for a period of up to 8 weeks. Mycological cure rate at 4 weeks was 33% for ketoconazole and 29% for griseofulvin, and at 8 weeks was 53% and 57% respectively. The efficacy of both drugs in the treatment of interdigital tinea pedis is similar, and is considerably lower than that found with topical imidazole preparations where cure rates of over 70% are generally expected.

摘要

29例经真菌学证实的足癣患者被随机分配接受口服治疗,一组每日服用200毫克酮康唑,另一组每日服用1克灰黄霉素,疗程最长8周。酮康唑组4周时的真菌学治愈率为33%,灰黄霉素组为29%;8周时,酮康唑组和灰黄霉素组的治愈率分别为53%和57%。两种药物治疗趾间足癣的疗效相似,且显著低于局部用咪唑类制剂,后者通常预期治愈率超过70%。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验