Suppr超能文献

四种饮食质量指数比较,以定义单一餐的健康程度。

Comparisons of Four Diet Quality Indexes to Define Single Meal Healthfulness.

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Davidson College, Davidson, NC.

Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.

出版信息

J Acad Nutr Diet. 2022 Jan;122(1):149-158. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2021.06.010. Epub 2021 Jul 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many dietary indexes exist to evaluate nutrition quality, but few specifically assess the quality of a single meal.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to compare 4 different diet quality indexes in their ability to assess the nutrition quality of single meals.

DESIGN

This was a secondary analysis of data from the PACE (Effects of Physical Activity Calorie Expenditure) food labeling study (2015-2017). Data were collected in business cafeterias in North Carolina and included photos of lunch trays before consumption from an adult population and serving sizes of each food item. Additional nutrient analysis was conducted to compile macro- and micronutrient data for each food item, in addition to servings provided from each food group.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The main outcome was individual meal nutrition quality. Data from the PACE study were used to calculate the scores of the following diet quality indexes: Healthy Eating Index 2015, Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension accordance score, Main Meal Quality Index, and Nutrient Rich Foods Index.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS PERFORMED

To score the meals, algorithms were created in SAS software, version 9.4, to combine individual foods and beverages into meals and calculate scores according to the individual index components. The total scores for each of the indexes were compared using Spearman correlation coefficients.

RESULTS

A total of 8,070 observations or "meals" from 379 participants were scored for this study. The scores for each observation varied by index. The Spearman correlation coefficients between the indexes for the total score for all observations ranged from 0.26 to 0.68. The correlation coefficients did not change equally among the indexes when observations were excluded based on predefined criteria for what constitutes a meal.

CONCLUSIONS

There is wide variability in scores of the 4 diet quality indexes analyzed in this study. In addition, the indexes show weak to moderate correlation, indicating that the appropriateness of the index will depend greatly on the study questions and objectives.

摘要

背景

有许多饮食指数可用于评估营养质量,但很少有专门评估单一餐的质量。

目的

我们旨在比较 4 种不同的饮食质量指数在评估单一餐营养质量方面的能力。

设计

这是对北卡罗来纳州商业自助餐厅中成年人的午餐餐盘在食用前的照片和每种食物份量进行收集的 PACE(体力活动热量消耗的影响)食物标签研究(2015-2017 年)数据的二次分析。此外,还对每种食物进行了额外的营养分析,以编制每个食物组的宏量和微量营养素数据。

主要观察指标

主要观察指标是个体餐的营养质量。PACE 研究的数据用于计算以下饮食质量指数的分数:2015 年健康饮食指数、停止高血压的饮食方法得分、主餐质量指数和富含营养食物指数。

统计分析

为了给餐食评分,我们在 SAS 软件版本 9.4 中创建了算法,将个体食物和饮料组合成餐食,并根据每个指数的组成部分计算分数。使用 Spearman 相关系数比较每个指数的总分。

结果

本研究共对 379 名参与者的 8070 个观察结果或“餐食”进行了评分。每个观察结果的分数因指数而异。对于所有观察结果的总分,指数之间的 Spearman 相关系数范围为 0.26 至 0.68。当根据构成餐食的预定义标准排除观察结果时,指数之间的相关系数不会均等变化。

结论

在本研究中分析的 4 种饮食质量指数的评分存在很大差异。此外,这些指数显示出弱到中度的相关性,表明指数的适当性将在很大程度上取决于研究问题和目标。

相似文献

3
Nutritional interventions for survivors of childhood cancer.儿童癌症幸存者的营养干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 22;2016(8):CD009678. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009678.pub2.

本文引用的文献

5
Evaluation of the Healthy Eating Index-2015.评价 2015 年健康饮食指数。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018 Sep;118(9):1622-1633. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2018.05.019.
7
Update of the Healthy Eating Index: HEI-2015.更新后的健康饮食指数:HEI-2015。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018 Sep;118(9):1591-1602. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2018.05.021.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验