Suppr超能文献

谁选择“健康”的餐食?工作场所自助餐厅午餐质量分析。

Who chooses "healthy" meals? An analysis of lunchtime meal quality in a workplace cafeteria.

机构信息

Davidson College, PO Box 5000, 209 Ridge Road, Davidson, NC, 28035, USA.

Duke University School of Medicine, 2200 W Main St, Durham, NC, 27705, USA.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2024 Mar 29;24(1):921. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18284-5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The workplace can play an important role in shaping the eating behaviors of U.S. adults. Unfortunately, foods obtained in the workplace tend to be low in nutritional quality. Questions remain about the best way to approach the promotion of healthy food purchases among employees and to what extent health promotion activities should be tailored to the demographic characteristics of the employees. The purpose of this study was to (1) assess the nutritional quality of lunchtime meal purchases by employees in cafeterias of a large organization, (2) examine associations between lunchtime meal quality selection and the demographic characteristics of employees, and (3) determine the healthfulness of foods and beverages offered in the cafeterias of this organization.

METHODS

A cross-sectional analysis was conducted using secondary data from a food labeling study implemented in three worksite cafeterias. Demographic data was collected via surveys and meal data was collected using a photo capture system for 378 participants. The Healthy Eating Index 2015 (HEI-2015) was used to determine meal quality and a total score for the menu of options available in the cafeterias during the study period. Summary statistics were generated, and the analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the HEI-2015 scores between groups.

RESULTS

The mean HEI-2015 total score for the menu items offered (n = 1,229) in the cafeteria during the study period was 63.1 (SD = 1.83). The mean HEI-2015 score for individual lunchtime meal observations (n = 378) was 47.1 (SD = 6.8). In general, HEI-2015 total scores were higher for non-smokers, individuals who self-identified as Asian, had higher physical activity levels, scored higher on numeracy and literacy assessments, and reported higher education levels, incomes, and health status.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall HEI-2015 scores indicate that the menu of options offered in the cafeterias and individual meal selections did not align with the Dietary Guidelines for Americans, and there were significant associations between average lunchtime meal quality scores and several demographic characteristics. These results suggest that healthy eating promotion activities in workplaces may need to be tailored to the demographic characteristics of the employees, and efforts to improve the food environment in the workplace could improve meal quality for all employees.

摘要

背景

工作场所可以在塑造美国成年人的饮食习惯方面发挥重要作用。不幸的是,在工作场所获得的食物往往营养价值较低。关于促进员工购买健康食品的最佳方法以及健康促进活动应该在多大程度上针对员工的人口统计学特征进行调整,仍存在一些问题。本研究的目的是:(1)评估大型组织员工在自助餐厅购买午餐的营养质量;(2)研究午餐质量选择与员工人口统计学特征之间的关系;(3)确定该组织自助餐厅提供的食品和饮料的健康程度。

方法

使用在三个工作场所自助餐厅实施的食品标签研究的二次数据进行横断面分析。通过调查收集人口统计学数据,使用照片拍摄系统收集 378 名参与者的用餐数据。使用 2015 年健康饮食指数(HEI-2015)来确定用餐质量和研究期间自助餐厅菜单中可用选项的总分。生成汇总统计数据,并使用方差分析(ANOVA)比较组间的 HEI-2015 得分。

结果

研究期间自助餐厅提供的菜单项目的平均 HEI-2015 总分(n=1229)为 63.1(SD=1.83)。378 份个人午餐观察的平均 HEI-2015 分数为 47.1(SD=6.8)。一般来说,不吸烟者、自认为是亚洲人的个体、体力活动水平较高、算术和读写能力得分较高、受教育程度、收入和健康状况较高的个体,HEI-2015 总分较高。

结论

总体而言,HEI-2015 总分表明自助餐厅提供的菜单选项和个人用餐选择不符合《美国人膳食指南》,平均午餐质量得分与几个人口统计学特征之间存在显著关联。这些结果表明,工作场所的健康饮食促进活动可能需要根据员工的人口统计学特征进行调整,改善工作场所的食物环境可以提高所有员工的用餐质量。

相似文献

1
Who chooses "healthy" meals? An analysis of lunchtime meal quality in a workplace cafeteria.
BMC Public Health. 2024 Mar 29;24(1):921. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18284-5.
3
Nutritional labelling for healthier food or non-alcoholic drink purchasing and consumption.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 27;2(2):CD009315. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009315.pub2.
4
Comparisons of Four Diet Quality Indexes to Define Single Meal Healthfulness.
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2022 Jan;122(1):149-158. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2021.06.010. Epub 2021 Jul 21.
6
Nutritional interventions for survivors of childhood cancer.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 22;2016(8):CD009678. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009678.pub2.
7
Workplace pedometer interventions for increasing physical activity.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Apr 30(4):CD009209. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009209.pub2.
8
"I Wish They'd Just Let Us Be." Experiences of Indian Autistic Individuals Around Stimming Behaviors at the Workplace.
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Dec 2;6(4):474-484. doi: 10.1089/aut.2022.0096. eCollection 2024 Dec.
9
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.

本文引用的文献

1
Race and Ethnic Categories: A Brief Review of Global Terms and Nomenclature.
Cureus. 2023 Jul 1;15(7):e41253. doi: 10.7759/cureus.41253. eCollection 2023 Jul.
3
Adults Meeting Fruit and Vegetable Intake Recommendations - United States, 2019.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022 Jan 7;71(1):1-9. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7101a1.
4
The effectiveness of nudging: A meta-analysis of choice architecture interventions across behavioral domains.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Jan 4;119(1). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2107346118.
5
Diet Quality in the United States Improved during the Great Recession and Deteriorated During Economic Recovery.
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2022 May;122(5):974-980. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2021.09.019. Epub 2021 Dec 22.
7
Comparisons of Four Diet Quality Indexes to Define Single Meal Healthfulness.
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2022 Jan;122(1):149-158. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2021.06.010. Epub 2021 Jul 21.
8
Social connections and the healthfulness of food choices in an employee population.
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Oct;5(10):1349-1357. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01103-x. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
9
Workplace cafeteria and other multicomponent interventions to promote healthy eating among adults: A systematic review.
Prev Med Rep. 2021 Feb 23;22:101333. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101333. eCollection 2021 Jun.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验