Suppr超能文献

公平、技术与残奥会运动分级的伦理问题。

Fairness, technology and the ethics of Paralympic sport classification.

机构信息

KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Swansea University, Swansea, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Sport Sci. 2021 Nov;21(11):1510-1517. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2021.1961022. Epub 2021 Sep 13.

Abstract

Fairness in sport is a widely shared meritocratic norm. Its application is usually restricted to equality of opportunity to compete for victory. Paralympic sports lay down a further challenge in that equality of opportunity must be shaped by considerations of fairness, evidenced by the development of discrete competition categories to construct fair and meaningful contests. In this article, we extend these philosophical ideas to consider how Fair Equality of Opportunity might operate in the context of Paralympic sports classification. We articulate three conceptions of fairness relevant to these sports: (i) background fairness; (ii) procedural fairness; and (iii) stakes fairness. We critically review the International Paralympic Committee's Policy on Sport Equipment in relation to the first two conceptions and argue that greater clarification, theorization and rule modification is required if physical prowess, as opposed to equipment technology, is to be assured as the dominant determinant of Paralympic athletic success.

摘要

公平竞争是一项被广泛认可的精英主义规范。它的应用通常仅限于平等的竞争机会,以争取胜利。残奥会运动提出了进一步的挑战,即平等的竞争机会必须考虑公平因素,这体现在为构建公平和有意义的比赛而制定的离散竞赛类别上。在本文中,我们将这些哲学思想扩展到考虑公平机会平等如何在残奥会运动分类的背景下运作。我们阐述了与这些运动相关的三个公平概念:(i)背景公平;(ii)程序公平;和(iii)利害关系公平。我们批判性地审查了国际残奥委会的运动装备政策,以涉及前两个概念,并认为如果要确保身体能力而不是设备技术成为残奥会运动成功的主要决定因素,就需要进一步澄清、理论化和规则修改。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验