• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改良培根术与双吻合器术治疗直肠癌的对比分析

Comparative analysis of modified Bacon operation and double stapler operation in the treatment of rectal cancer.

作者信息

Yang Jianyong, Tian Lijun, Niu Liyun, Zhai Chunbao

机构信息

Department of Colorectal & Anal Surgery, Shanxi Provincial People's Hospital Taiyuan, Shanxi, China.

出版信息

Am J Transl Res. 2021 Jun 15;13(6):7235-7241. eCollection 2021.

PMID:34306487
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8290663/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy of modified Bacon operation and double stapler operation in treating lower rectal cancer.

METHODS

A total of 73 patients with lower rectal cancer admitted to the general surgery department of our hospital from March 2016 to March 2017 were selected for the study. According to different operation methods, the patients were divided into an observation group and a control group. Modified Bacon operation was used in the observation group (39 cases), while double stapler operation was adopted for the control group (34 cases). The intraoperative and postoperative conditions and 3-year survival rates were observed.

RESULTS

The bleeding volume and anal exhaust time in the observation group were better than those in the control group, the difference being statistically significant (<0.05). No significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of the operation time, abdominal drainage volume, anal extubation time, or the number of lymph node dissection (>0.05). The anal function of the two groups was evaluated one month and six months after operation respectively, and no significant difference was found between the function of the two groups (>0.05). There was no significant difference in postoperative complications, local recurrence, and distant metastasis between the two groups (>0.05). The 3-year survival rate was 89.74% in the observation group and 91.18% in the control group. Our analysis found no significant difference in the cumulative survival rates between the two groups (>0.05).

CONCLUSION

Modified Bacon operation and double stapler operation are effective treatment for lower rectal cancer, and the survival benefit of patients is obvious. The methods are worthy of clinical promotion.

摘要

目的

探讨改良培根术与双吻合器术治疗低位直肠癌的疗效。

方法

选取2016年3月至2017年3月我院普通外科收治的73例低位直肠癌患者进行研究。根据手术方式不同,将患者分为观察组和对照组。观察组39例采用改良培根术,对照组34例采用双吻合器术。观察术中及术后情况及3年生存率。

结果

观察组术中出血量及肛门排气时间优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(<0.05)。两组手术时间、腹腔引流量、拔管时间及淋巴结清扫数目比较,差异无统计学意义(>0.05)。分别于术后1个月和6个月对两组肛门功能进行评估,两组功能比较差异无统计学意义(>0.05)。两组术后并发症、局部复发及远处转移情况比较,差异无统计学意义(>0.05)。观察组3年生存率为89.74%,对照组为91.18%。分析发现两组累积生存率差异无统计学意义(>0.05)。

结论

改良培根术与双吻合器术治疗低位直肠癌疗效确切,患者生存获益明显,值得临床推广。

相似文献

1
Comparative analysis of modified Bacon operation and double stapler operation in the treatment of rectal cancer.改良培根术与双吻合器术治疗直肠癌的对比分析
Am J Transl Res. 2021 Jun 15;13(6):7235-7241. eCollection 2021.
2
Application of laparoscopic modified Bacon operation in patients with low rectal cancer and analysis of the changes in anal function: A retrospective single-center study.腹腔镜改良Bacon手术在低位直肠癌患者中的应用及肛门功能变化分析:一项单中心回顾性研究。
Front Oncol. 2023 Jan 31;13:1087642. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1087642. eCollection 2023.
3
[Analysis on the technical characteristics and clinical efficacy of robotic-assisted intersphincteric resection for patients with low rectal cancer].[机器人辅助低位直肠癌括约肌间切除术的技术特点及临床疗效分析]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Dec 25;22(12):1137-1143. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0274.2019.12.008.
4
Laparoscopic Double Discoid Resection With a Circular Stapler for Bowel Endometriosis.使用圆形吻合器行腹腔镜双盘状切除术治疗肠道子宫内膜异位症
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015 Sep-Oct;22(6):929-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.04.021. Epub 2015 Apr 29.
5
Comparison of efficacy between natural orifice specimen extraction without abdominal incision and conventional laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of sigmoid colon cancer and upper rectal cancer.经自然腔道标本取出术(NOTES)与传统腹腔镜手术治疗乙状结肠癌和上段直肠癌的疗效比较
J BUON. 2019 Sep-Oct;24(5):1817-1823.
6
[Efficacy analysis of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy combined with total pelvic exenteration in the treatment of primary T4b rectal cancer].新辅助放化疗联合全盆腔脏器切除术治疗原发性T4b期直肠癌的疗效分析
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Jan 25;22(1):59-65.
7
[Accurate low ligation of inferior mesenteric artery and root lymph node dissection according to different vascular typing in laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer].腹腔镜直肠癌根治术中根据不同血管分型准确低位结扎肠系膜下动脉及根部淋巴结清扫术
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Jan 25;21(1):46-52.
8
[Effect of preservation of left colic artery on postoperative anastomotic leakage of patients with rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy].[保留左结肠动脉对新辅助治疗后直肠癌患者术后吻合口漏的影响]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Jun 25;22(6):566-572. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0274.2019.06.010.
9
[Comparison on efficacy between fascia-oriented versus vascular-oriented lateral lymph node dissection in patients with rectal cancer].[直肠癌患者筋膜导向与血管导向外侧淋巴结清扫术疗效比较]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Jul 25;24(7):611-618. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.441530-20210131-00046.
10
[Short-term clinical efficacy of robotic radical resection for high rectal cancer with transvaginal specimen extraction].经阴道标本取出的机器人辅助直肠癌根治术治疗高位直肠癌的短期临床疗效
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Dec 25;22(12):1124-1130. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0274.2019.12.006.

引用本文的文献

1
A new way to remedy anastomotic leakage after TaTME: A case report.经肛全直肠系膜切除术(TaTME)后吻合口漏的一种新的补救方法:病例报告
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2025 Jul;132:111047. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2025.111047. Epub 2025 Mar 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of short-term outcome between diverting colostomy and colonic stent as a bridge to surgery for left colonic malignant obstruction.左半结肠恶性梗阻手术前转流性结肠造口术与结肠支架作为过渡治疗的短期疗效比较
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Apr;99(14):e19557. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019557.
2
Presenting symptoms of cancer and stage at diagnosis: evidence from a cross-sectional, population-based study.诊断时癌症的表现症状和分期:一项基于人群的横断面研究证据。
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Jan;21(1):73-79. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30595-9. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
3
A Multicenter Study Evaluating Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery for Rectal Cancer.多中心研究评价直肠癌经自然腔道取标本手术。
J Surg Res. 2019 Nov;243:236-241. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.05.034. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
4
Uni-center, patient-blinded, randomized, 12-month, parallel group, noninferiority study to compare outcomes of 3-row vs 2-row circular staplers for colorectal anastomosis formation after low anterior resection for rectal cancer.单中心、患者盲法、随机、12个月、平行组、非劣效性研究,比较直肠癌低位前切除术后使用三排与两排圆形吻合器进行结直肠吻合形成的结果。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jun;98(24):e15978. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015978.
5
Surgical complications after different therapeutic approaches for locally advanced rectal cancer.局部晚期直肠癌不同治疗方法后的手术并发症。
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2019 May 15;11(5):393-403. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v11.i5.393.
6
Can rectal washout reduce anastomotic recurrence after anterior resection for rectal cancer? A review of the literature.直肠冲洗能否降低直肠癌前切除术后的吻合口复发率?文献综述。
Surg Today. 2020 Jul;50(7):644-649. doi: 10.1007/s00595-019-01825-6. Epub 2019 May 27.
7
Comparison of safety of loop ileostomy and loop transverse colostomy for low-lying rectal cancer patients undergoing anterior resection: A retrospective, single institute, propensity score-matched study.低位直肠癌患者前切除术回肠袢式造口术与横结肠袢式造口术安全性的比较:一项回顾性、单机构、倾向评分匹配研究。
J BUON. 2019 Jan-Feb;24(1):123-129.
8
Correction to: Long-term results of intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer in Japan.对《日本低位直肠癌括约肌间切除术的长期结果》的更正
Surg Today. 2019 Apr;49(4):286-287. doi: 10.1007/s00595-019-1767-7.
9
Awareness and management of low anterior resection syndrome: A Dutch national survey among colorectal surgeons and specialized nurses.低前切除综合征的认知和管理:荷兰结直肠外科医生和专科护士的全国性调查。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019 Feb;45(2):174-179. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.11.001. Epub 2018 Nov 10.
10
Clinical Etiology of Hypermetabolic Pelvic Lesions in Postoperative Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Patients With Rectal and Sigmoid Cancer.直肠癌和乙状结肠癌患者术后正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描中高代谢盆腔病变的临床病因
Ann Coloproctol. 2018 Apr;34(2):78-82. doi: 10.3393/ac.2017.09.21. Epub 2018 Apr 30.