Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Department of Human Movement Sciences, Amsterdam Movement Sciences and Institute Brain and Behavior Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Optom Vis Sci. 2021 Jul 1;98(7):854-863. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001735.
Paralympic judo currently requires all athletes to compete against each other in one class irrespective of their level of vision impairment (VI). Recent evidence suggests that multiple classes are required to enhance fairness, yet it remains unclear how many classes are necessary and what vision tests should be used to define those classes.
The aim of this study was to quantify the relationship between vision and performance in judo for individuals with VI. The results were expected to inform the development of evidence-based criteria to structure Paralympic judo competition.
The visual function of 53 elite VI judokas was assessed using a test battery that included tests of visual acuity (VA), contrast sensitivity, light sensitivity, depth perception, motion perception, visual search, and central visual field. Performance was assessed by measuring the ratio of fights won across all competitions the participants took part in in the 2 years before and after vision testing. Pearson correlation coefficients and decision tree analyses were used to determine the relationship between vision and performance. Partial correlations were also conducted to determine the unique ability of each measure of visual function to predict judo performance.
Visual acuity was the best predictor of judo performance and remained the only visual function related to performance when controlling for correlations between VA and other visual functions. Decision tree analyses suggested to split athletes into two groups for more legitimate competition, using a cutoff point around 2.6 logMAR. Within each of the two resulting subgroups, no correlations remained between any of the visual functions and performance.
The results of this study suggest that VI judo competition should be split into separate categories for partially sighted and functionally blind athletes. The inclusion of visual functions in addition to VA does not improve the ability to predict performance in VI judo.
目前,残奥会柔道比赛要求所有运动员无论视力损伤程度如何,都在同一级别进行比赛。最近的证据表明,需要多个级别来提高公平性,但仍不清楚需要多少个级别,以及应该使用哪些视力测试来定义这些级别。
本研究旨在量化视力损伤的个体在柔道中的视力和表现之间的关系。研究结果有望为制定基于证据的残奥会柔道比赛结构标准提供信息。
使用包括视力(VA)、对比敏感度、光敏感度、深度感知、运动感知、视觉搜索和中央视野测试在内的测试组合,评估了 53 名精英 VI 柔道运动员的视觉功能。通过测量参与者在视力测试前后 2 年参加的所有比赛中获胜的比赛比例来评估表现。使用 Pearson 相关系数和决策树分析来确定视力和表现之间的关系。还进行了偏相关分析,以确定每种视觉功能对预测柔道表现的独特能力。
VA 是柔道表现的最佳预测指标,并且在控制 VA 与其他视觉功能之间的相关性后,仍然是唯一与表现相关的视觉功能。决策树分析表明,使用 2.6 logMAR 左右的截断点,将运动员分为两组进行更合法的比赛。在两个由此产生的子组中的每一个中,任何视觉功能与表现之间都没有相关性。
本研究的结果表明,残奥会柔道比赛应分为视力障碍和功能失明运动员的单独类别。除了 VA 之外,还包括视觉功能并不能提高预测 VI 柔道表现的能力。