Wang Xiaodan, Li Xinhai, Ren Xiaotong, Jackson Micha V, Fuller Richard A, Melville David S, Amano Tatsuya, Ma Zhijun
Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, National Observations and Research Station for Wetland Ecosystems of the Yangtze Estuary, Institute of Eco-Chongming, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Key Laboratory of Animal Ecology and Conservation Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China.
Conserv Biol. 2022 Apr;36(2):e13808. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13808. Epub 2021 Jul 27.
Anthropogenic impacts have reduced natural areas but increased the area of anthropogenic landscapes. There is debate about whether anthropogenic landscapes (e.g., farmlands, orchards, and fish ponds) provide alternatives to natural habitat and under what circumstances. We considered whether anthropogenic landscapes can mitigate population declines for waterbirds. We collected data on population trends and biological traits of 1203 populations of 579 species across the planet. Using Bayesian generalized linear mixed models, we tested whether the ability of a species to use an anthropogenic landscape can predict population trends of waterbird globally and of species of conservation concern. Anthropogenic landscapes benefited population maintenance of common but not less-common species. Conversely, the use of anthropogenic landscapes was associated with population declines for threatened species. Our findings delineate some limitations to the ability of anthropogenic landscapes to mitigate population declines, suggesting that the maintenance of global waterbird populations depends on protecting remaining natural areas and improving the habitat quality in anthropogenic landscapes. Article impact statement: Protecting natural areas and improving the quality of anthropogenic landscapes as habitat are both needed to achieve effective conservation.
人为影响减少了自然区域,但增加了人为景观的面积。关于人为景观(如农田、果园和鱼塘)是否能替代自然栖息地以及在何种情况下能替代,存在争议。我们研究了人为景观是否能缓解水鸟数量的下降。我们收集了全球579种1203个种群的数量趋势和生物学特征数据。使用贝叶斯广义线性混合模型,我们测试了一个物种利用人为景观的能力是否能预测全球水鸟以及受保护关注物种的数量趋势。人为景观有利于常见物种而非不那么常见物种的种群维持。相反,对于受威胁物种,利用人为景观与种群数量下降有关。我们的研究结果划定了人为景观缓解种群数量下降能力的一些局限性,表明全球水鸟种群的维持依赖于保护剩余的自然区域以及改善人为景观中的栖息地质量。文章影响声明:实现有效保护既需要保护自然区域,也需要改善作为栖息地的人为景观质量。