Uden Daniel R, Hellman Michelle L, Angeler David G, Allen Craig R
Ecol Appl. 2014;24(7):1569-82. doi: 10.1890/13-1755.1.
Ecological reserves provide important wildlife habitat in many landscapes, and the functional connectivity of reserves and other suitable habitat patches is crucial for the persistence and resilience of spatially structured populations. To maintain or increase connectivity at spatial scales larger than individual patches, conservation actions may focus on creating and maintaining reserves and/or influencing management on non-reserves. Using a graph-theoretic approach, we assessed the functional connectivity and spatial distribution of wetlands in the Rainwater Basin of Nebraska, USA, an intensively cultivated agricultural matrix, at four assumed, but ecologically realistic, anuran dispersal distances. We compared connectivity in the current landscape to the historical landscape and putative future landscapes, and evaluated the importance of individual and aggregated reserve and non-reserve wetlands for maintaining connectivity. Connectivity was greatest in the historical landscape, where wetlands were also the most densely distributed. The construction of irrigation reuse pits for water storage has maintained connectivity in the current landscape by replacing destroyed wetlands, but these pits likely provide suboptimal habitat. Also, because there are fewer total wetlands (i.e., wetlands and irrigation reuse pits) in the current landscape than the historical landscape, and because the distribution of current wetlands is less clustered than that of historical wetlands, larger and longer dispersing, sometimes nonnative species may be favored over smaller, shorter dispersing species of conservation concern. Because of their relatively low number, wetland reserves do not affect connectivity as greatly as non-reserve wetlands or irrigation reuse pits; however, they likely provide the highest quality anuran habitat. To improve future levels of resilience in this wetland habitat network, management could focus on continuing to improve the conservation status of non-reserve wetlands, restoring wetlands at spatial scales that promote movements of shorter dispersing species, and further scrutinizing irrigation reuse pit removal by considering effects on functional connectivity for anurans, an emblematic and threatened group of organisms. However, broader conservation plans will need to give consideration to other wetland-dependent species, incorporate invasive species management, and address additional challenges arising from global change in social-ecological systems like the Rainwater Basin.
生态保护区在许多景观中提供了重要的野生动物栖息地,保护区与其他适宜栖息地斑块的功能连通性对于空间结构化种群的持久性和恢复力至关重要。为了在大于单个斑块的空间尺度上维持或增强连通性,保护行动可能侧重于创建和维护保护区以及/或者影响非保护区的管理。我们采用图论方法,在美国内布拉斯加州雨水盆地的湿地功能连通性和空间分布进行了评估,该地区是一个集约化耕种的农业区域,设定了四个假定但符合生态现实的无尾两栖类扩散距离。我们将当前景观中的连通性与历史景观和假定的未来景观进行了比较,并评估了单个和聚集的保护区及非保护区湿地对于维持连通性的重要性。连通性在历史景观中最强,那里的湿地分布也最为密集。通过建造用于蓄水的灌溉回用坑来替代被破坏的湿地,从而在当前景观中维持了连通性,但这些坑可能提供的是次优栖息地。此外,由于当前景观中湿地(即湿地和灌溉回用坑)的总数比历史景观中少,且当前湿地的分布不如历史湿地那样聚集,所以体型较大、扩散距离更长(有时是外来物种)的物种可能比受保护的体型较小、扩散距离较短的物种更具优势。由于湿地保护区数量相对较少,其对连通性的影响不如非保护区湿地或灌溉回用坑大;然而,它们可能提供了质量最高的无尾两栖类栖息地。为了提高这个湿地栖息地网络未来的恢复力水平,管理工作可以侧重于继续改善非保护区湿地的保护状况,在促进扩散距离较短物种移动的空间尺度上恢复湿地,并通过考虑对无尾两栖类(一类具有代表性且受到威胁的生物群体)功能连通性的影响,进一步仔细审查灌溉回用坑的移除。然而,更广泛的保护计划将需要考虑其他依赖湿地的物种,纳入入侵物种管理,并应对像雨水盆地这样的社会 - 生态系统中全球变化带来的其他挑战。