Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia (Drs Ymer, McKay, Wong, Grima, and Ponsford); Monash Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Melbourne, Australia (Drs Ymer, McKay, Wong, Frencham, Grima, Nguyen, and Ponsford and Ms Tran); Department of Psychology, Epworth Rehabilitation, Melbourne, Australia (Drs Ymer, McKay, and Nguyen); and School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia (Dr Wong).
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2022;37(3):E220-E230. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000705. Epub 2021 Jul 26.
To identify factors associated with treatment response to cognitive behavioral therapy for sleep disturbance and fatigue (CBT-SF) after acquired brain injury (ABI).
Community dwelling.
Thirty participants with a traumatic brain injury or stroke randomized to receive CBT-SF in a parent randomized controlled trial.
Participants took part in a parallel-groups, parent randomized controlled trial with blinded outcome assessment, comparing an 8-week CBT-SF program with an attentionally equivalent health education control. They were assessed at baseline, post-treatment, 2 months post-treatment, and 4 months post-treatment. The study was completed either face-to-face or via telehealth (videoconferencing). Following this trial, a secondary analysis of variables associated with treatment response to CBT-SF was conducted, including: demographic variables; injury-related variables; neuropsychological characteristics; pretreatment sleep disturbance, fatigue, depression, anxiety and pain; and mode of treatment delivery (face-to-face or telehealth).
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS).
Greater treatment response to CBT-SF at 4-month follow-up was associated with higher baseline sleep and fatigue symptoms. Reductions in fatigue on the FSS were also related to injury mechanism, where those with a traumatic brain injury had a more rapid and short-lasting improvement in fatigue, compared with those with stroke, who had a delayed but longer-term reduction in fatigue. Mode of treatment delivery did not significantly impact CBT-SF outcomes.
Our findings highlight potential differences between fatigue trajectories in traumatic brain injury and stroke, and also provide preliminary support for the equivalence of face-to-face and telehealth delivery of CBT-SF in individuals with ABI.
确定与脑损伤后认知行为治疗睡眠障碍和疲劳(CBT-SF)治疗反应相关的因素。
社区居住。
30 名创伤性脑损伤或中风患者,随机分为接受认知行为治疗睡眠障碍和疲劳(CBT-SF)的父母随机对照试验。
参与者参加了一项平行组、父母随机对照试验,采用盲法结局评估,比较了 8 周的 CBT-SF 方案与注意力等效的健康教育对照。他们在基线、治疗后、治疗后 2 个月和治疗后 4 个月进行评估。研究是通过面对面或远程医疗(视频会议)完成的。在这项试验之后,对与 CBT-SF 治疗反应相关的变量进行了二次分析,包括:人口统计学变量;与损伤相关的变量;神经心理学特征;治疗前的睡眠障碍、疲劳、抑郁、焦虑和疼痛;以及治疗方式(面对面或远程医疗)。
匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)和疲劳严重程度量表(FSS)。
在 4 个月的随访中,CBT-SF 的治疗反应更好,与基线睡眠和疲劳症状更高有关。FSS 上的疲劳减少也与损伤机制有关,与中风相比,创伤性脑损伤患者的疲劳改善更快、更短暂,而中风患者的疲劳改善则更慢、持续时间更长。治疗方式并未显著影响 CBT-SF 的结果。
我们的研究结果强调了创伤性脑损伤和中风之间疲劳轨迹的潜在差异,并初步支持了在脑损伤患者中面对面和远程医疗提供 CBT-SF 的等效性。